Michigan State got screwed by the committee

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flipacoin9698
    SBR Sharp
    • 03-10-19
    • 266

    #1
    Michigan State got screwed by the committee
    I had them penciled in at #1 seed with a win today... maybe a high #2. Sagarin rankings have them solid #4 in the country... today's big win not yet computed into that.

    They get the region with Duke. Committed says they are the #7 overall seed... so why are they in the region with Duke the #1 overall seed? WTF?
  • Cuse0323
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 12-09-09
    • 30169

    #2
    Could have swapped them with Michigan.
    Comment
    • pavyracer
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 04-12-07
      • 82808

      #3
      Committe is crooked. They should go to drawing teams like they do in soccer for World Cup and Champions League.
      Comment
      • flipacoin9698
        SBR Sharp
        • 03-10-19
        • 266

        #4
        Originally posted by pavyracer
        Committe is crooked. They should go to drawing teams like they do in soccer for World Cup and Champions League.
        I read an article years ago that makes perfect sense... it was more specific for selecting the football final four but the logic applies. The choices should be made by professional oddsmakers based on who would be favored in each matchup. Makes perfect sense to me.
        Comment
        • thetrinity
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 01-25-11
          • 22430

          #5
          Waste of a Sunday afternoon the Cincy Houston game and that one.
          Comment
          • ThaTopMoron
            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
            • 04-30-10
            • 27020

            #6
            Mich State was knocked out early last year correct?

            bet them first round at halftime if they fail to cover 1st half...

            Virginia will make sure to MURDER whoever they play first game

            no way you go 0-2 with those plays if state gives you the chance to bet them 2h
            Comment
            • thetrinity
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 01-25-11
              • 22430

              #7
              I would lean to Michigan St and Virginia to cover personally. Bradley was 5th in a down Missouri valley. They don't belong anywhere near this tournament. Virginia well obvious reasons
              Comment
              • StackinGreen
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 10-09-10
                • 12140

                #8
                Calling all memories back to Iowa State top 2 seed back in 2000 (Tinsley, Fizer) and get put in MSU #1 regional, then play at the Palace and Sparty needed fake calls to beat them. State has been luckier than any other team; I don't feel bad.
                Comment
                • DOM_Toretto
                  Restricted User
                  • 01-28-13
                  • 9035

                  #9
                  Also ridiculous that MSU has to play early on Thursday. Gives them the least rest of all 68 teams.

                  MSU - the team with the most Quad 1 wins, the most wins against tourney teams, and the only power 5 to sweep their regular season & tourney championships - gets seeded in the #1 overall bracket and the quickest turnaround of all.
                  Comment
                  • thomorino
                    Restricted User
                    • 06-01-17
                    • 45842

                    #10
                    Michigan State was a better team than Michigan but their resume wasn't as good, their losses were bad, losing twice to Indiana. Its not just about how good a team is - its also the resume, Michigan State is better than Michigan, but their resume isn't as good.
                    Comment
                    • flipacoin9698
                      SBR Sharp
                      • 03-10-19
                      • 266

                      #11
                      Originally posted by thomorino
                      Michigan State was a better team than Michigan but their resume wasn't as good, their losses were bad, losing twice to Indiana. Its not just about how good a team is - its also the resume, Michigan State is better than Michigan, but their resume isn't as good.
                      That does not hold water. Yes they lost 2x to Indiana... but you are ignoring all of their big wins, most in the country. Those losses were without HALF of their offense out injured. At the end of the day, MSU got screwed with their seeding. No way in hell they should be treated like the overall 8th seed in the Duke bracket. And Duke got screwed too... no way they should have to face MSU to get to the dance. Wolves get preferential treatment as usual. So Izzo will have to come up with a plan to beat K... something he has rarely been able to do in the past. It seems easy to me... you get Zion in foul trouble... it is that simply. Duke is a #15 team without him.
                      Comment
                      • JIBBBY
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 12-10-09
                        • 83686

                        #12
                        Crap intentional foul not called late in the game today.. Could have been the difference between a win and a loss.. Looked rigged to me.. Refs are bone heads or paid off.
                        Comment
                        • 19th Hole
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 03-22-09
                          • 18951

                          #13
                          Yep. Michigan was fouled right after crossing the half-court line.
                          WTF was Blue doing throwing up a running 3 with time on the clock?
                          Terrible decision. They had over 13 seconds on the clock and bring the ball
                          up-court and shoot it helter-skelter.

                          Izzo doesn't Fizzo.
                          I got Sparty live at +380.
                          Comment
                          • Cuse0323
                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                            • 12-09-09
                            • 30169

                            #14
                            Originally posted by 19th Hole
                            Yep. Michigan was fouled right after crossing the half-court line.
                            WTF was Blue doing throwing up a running 3 with time on the clock?
                            Terrible decision. They had over 13 seconds on the clock and bring the ball
                            up-court and shoot it helter-skelter.

                            Izzo doesn't Fizzo.
                            I got Sparty live at +380.
                            Trying to draw the shooting foul since he was intentionally fouled. Terrible year for referees. I’m sure we’ll have some ultimate fck ups in the tourney as well.
                            Comment
                            • Itsamazing777
                              SBR Posting Legend
                              • 11-14-12
                              • 12602

                              #15
                              They eant the izzo k matchup. Look at tbe other regions. Same thing. Nc kentcuky.
                              Comment
                              • LT Profits
                                SBR Aristocracy
                                • 10-27-06
                                • 90963

                                #16
                                I disagree, I think the committee did the best job I have ever seen this year with no notable snubs and the four one-seeds matching mine. The addition of using NET rating seems like nice solution. I have no problem with Michigan State seeding, UNC, Tennssee and Kentucky all had better NETs and looks like Ky, Tenn, MSU is national 5-6-7 in that order with Michigan at 8.

                                Any quibbles seem pretty minor so kudos to the committee.
                                Comment
                                • jjgold
                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                  • 07-20-05
                                  • 388179

                                  #17
                                  Virg did not belong a number 1 seed but it does not matter

                                  If your good you win there are no homecourts

                                  If you look at seedings it has no correlation to a teams success
                                  Comment
                                  • RM Logic
                                    SBR Wise Guy
                                    • 12-09-13
                                    • 847

                                    #18
                                    Maybe they are tired of Izzo whining and crying all game long to the officials. He is beyond embarrassing. Despite being a good coach he is a jerk . Wish a ref had the balls to toss his midget ass out of the game once. Maybe he would realize how pathetic he looks.
                                    Comment
                                    • DOM_Toretto
                                      Restricted User
                                      • 01-28-13
                                      • 9035

                                      #19
                                      A
                                      Originally posted by LT Profits
                                      I disagree, I think the committee did the best job I have ever seen this year with no notable snubs and the four one-seeds matching mine. The addition of using NET rating seems like nice solution. I have no problem with Michigan State seeding, UNC, Tennssee and Kentucky all had better NETs and looks like Ky, Tenn, MSU is national 5-6-7 in that order with Michigan at 8.

                                      Any quibbles seem pretty minor so kudos to the committee.
                                      Can’t have it both ways. They used NET , you claim?

                                      Look at the bubble teams and their NET rankings then

                                      NC State (33) OUT
                                      Clemsin (35) OUT
                                      Texas (38) OUT
                                      Furman (41) OUT
                                      Belmont (47) IN
                                      Lipscomb (49) OUT
                                      TCU (52) OUT
                                      Indiana (54) OUT
                                      Temple (56) IN
                                      Alabama (59) OUT
                                      UNC-G (60) OUT
                                      Arizona State (63) IN
                                      St. John’s (73) IN
                                      Comment
                                      • thetrinity
                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                        • 01-25-11
                                        • 22430

                                        #20
                                        They don't go straight by net. Essentially putting Michigan St 8 and Michigan 5 is terrible since they went 3-0 against them. They both should be 2 seeds though, that part is ok
                                        Comment
                                        • RudyRuetigger
                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                          • 08-24-10
                                          • 65084

                                          #21
                                          I don't like the big 10 in anything, but I agree bro

                                          Michigan St was screwed here
                                          Comment
                                          • LT Profits
                                            SBR Aristocracy
                                            • 10-27-06
                                            • 90963

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by DOM_Toretto
                                            A

                                            Can’t have it both ways. They used NET , you claim?

                                            Look at the bubble teams and their NET rankings then

                                            NC State (33) OUT
                                            Clemsin (35) OUT
                                            Texas (38) OUT
                                            Furman (41) OUT
                                            Belmont (47) IN
                                            Lipscomb (49) OUT
                                            TCU (52) OUT
                                            Indiana (54) OUT
                                            Temple (56) IN
                                            Alabama (59) OUT
                                            UNC-G (60) OUT
                                            Arizona State (63) IN
                                            St. John’s (73) IN
                                            I said they "used" NET, I did not say it was a stand-alone factor. Think of it as a nice tiebreaker when teams are very close, which I think was the case for for the four two-seeds. Seems the two losses to Indiana ended up being huge for Sparty.
                                            Comment
                                            • LT Profits
                                              SBR Aristocracy
                                              • 10-27-06
                                              • 90963

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by thetrinity
                                              They don't go straight by net. Essentially putting Michigan St 8 and Michigan 5 is terrible since they went 3-0 against them. They both should be 2 seeds though, that part is ok
                                              Was probably Michigan State 7, Michigan 8 with Ky/Tenn 5-6. Don't go off of region to try and figure out 5-8, only the one-seeds are ranked nationally, after that there are more factors involved than just straight seeding. Yes the four two-seeds are predetermined (just as all seed numbers are), but once that is determined, placement is more complicated. In other words, the committee ranks every team and the four 2-seeds are obviously the teams ranked 5-8 nationally. BUT the 5 is not automatically placed in the 4 region, the 6 not automatically placed in 3-region, etc...
                                              Comment
                                              • DOM_Toretto
                                                Restricted User
                                                • 01-28-13
                                                • 9035

                                                #24
                                                Just doesn’t seem like much common sense was used. Besides the Duke factor, MSU is slated to play a team they already played in the 2nd round - both the 7 or 10 seed. That’s dumb. Both MSU & Michigan played Sunday and have to play Thursday on short rest. That’s dumb.
                                                Comment
                                                SBR Contests
                                                Collapse
                                                Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                Collapse
                                                Working...