This seems too easy. I mean, he can get swept 6-4 6-4 7-5 and the bet is a winner. He wins a set it's pretty much a winner. Is this really THAT big of a demolishing in the making to where he won't even be competitive?? 12.5 games for Pouille seems really low to me....
Pouille OVER 12.5 Games is +$$$$???
Collapse
X
-
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#1Pouille OVER 12.5 Games is +$$$$???Tags: None -
MiDNiTeSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-11-13
- 7684
#2If u think pouille wins that much games isn't over 30.5 or 31.5 better?Comment -
cincinnatikid513SBR Aristocracy
- 11-23-17
- 45360
#3ohh boyComment -
nuxx??SBR Sharp
- 06-06-17
- 473
#4People don't listen. Overvaluing poullies win against below medicre Raonic when he's playing against a GOAT.. Yikes.Comment -
horja1SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-13-11
- 5646
#5Originally posted by nuxx??People don't listen. Overvaluing poullies win against below medicre Raonic when he's playing against a GOAT.. Yikes.Comment -
nuxx??SBR Sharp
- 06-06-17
- 473
#6Originally posted by horja1You got it wrong. He is not playing against Federer.Comment -
DavidGoliath5003SBR MVP
- 03-20-18
- 4100
#7Originally posted by nuxx??If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.Comment -
badgerguySBR MVP
- 03-21-13
- 2281
#8Those were two of the most pathetic grand slam semi final matches ever. Holy shit.Comment -
cincinnatikid513SBR Aristocracy
- 11-23-17
- 45360
#9Originally posted by badgerguyThose were two of the most pathetic grand slam semi final matches ever. Holy shit.Comment -
JaimeMiroSBR MVP
- 03-14-17
- 2515
#10Originally posted by horja1You got it wrong. He is not playing against Federer.. Nah, seriously, the goat argument doesn't hold water when you've got 3 players that have lights out dominated this era. I wouldn't even give Fed the edge because of the # of Slams...
Nadal, Djoko at their best just didn't have competition. Name one time someone beat Nadal on his favorite slam in a final?Comment -
DavidGoliath5003SBR MVP
- 03-20-18
- 4100
#11I guess per years in Nadal would be the Goat, then Djokovic followed by Federer. Federers style is easy on the body which makes him in the running to be the goat... hes naturally talentedComment -
JaimeMiroSBR MVP
- 03-14-17
- 2515
#12True, we've been blessed. Which is why things like goat get lost in translation; they're all goats in their own right. For all we know, Fed and Nadal would've retired in 2014/2015 and yet here we are...Comment -
MalikHusamSBR MVP
- 09-07-16
- 2701
#13Originally posted by nuxx??If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.
can't pick yourself
both nadal and djokovic pick federer, no questions about itComment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388179
#14Originally posted by MalikHusamyes but if you ask djokovic federer and nadal to pick the greatest player in the past 15 years among all ATP players
can't pick yourself
both nadal and djokovic pick federer, no questions about it
Nadal and Joker better big match playersComment -
MalikHusamSBR MVP
- 09-07-16
- 2701
#15Originally posted by jjgoldlol they do that out of respect
Nadal and Joker better big match players
you realize how much older he is?Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#16Tremendous work guys!Comment -
DavidGoliath5003SBR MVP
- 03-20-18
- 4100
#17After thinking about it more Federer has to be the Goat.. do you really see djokovic in the Top 3 6 years from now? Or Nadal in the top 3 4 years from now. I forget how old roger is sometimes. I think we all doComment -
bruceBRUCEbruceSBR MVP
- 06-20-09
- 2560
#18Originally posted by nuxx??If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.
he won majors against agassi, rafa, roddick, and djokovic during that timeComment -
nuxx??SBR Sharp
- 06-06-17
- 473
#19Originally posted by bruceBRUCEbrucehalf the reason why there was no "competition" is because Feds was so dominant in that era
he won majors against agassi, rafa, roddick, and djokovic during that time
Saying roddick was a competition is like saying Nishikori/Berdych/Tsonga/Cilic are competition to big 3. No they aren't, they're 2 tiers below them.
How can you consider someone a GOAT after winning two slams in 7 years period (2010-2016) is beyond me.Comment -
DavidGoliath5003SBR MVP
- 03-20-18
- 4100
#20Originally posted by nuxx??Against 34 year old Agassi who hasnt aged as well as Fed is aging? Nadal who was not a threat on any non clay court and who needed couple of years to adjust? Djokovic who was a fukking teenager at the age of 19? Get the fukk out. I can't belive you actually put roddick in the same sentence with the big 3.
Saying roddick was a competition is like saying Nishikori/Berdych/Tsonga/Cilic are competition to big 3. No they aren't, they're 2 tiers below them.
How can you consider someone a GOAT after winning two slams in 7 years period (2010-2016) is beyond me.Comment -
horja1SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-13-11
- 5646
#21Originally posted by nuxx??Against 34 year old Agassi who hasnt aged as well as Fed is aging? Nadal who was not a threat on any non clay court and who needed couple of years to adjust? Djokovic who was a fukking teenager at the age of 19? Get the fukk out. I can't belive you actually put roddick in the same sentence with the big 3.
Saying roddick was a competition is like saying Nishikori/Berdych/Tsonga/Cilic are competition to big 3. No they aren't, they're 2 tiers below them.
How can you consider someone a GOAT after winning two slams in 7 years period (2010-2016) is beyond me.Comment -
nuxx??SBR Sharp
- 06-06-17
- 473
#22Originally posted by horja1Love how age is an argument against Federer, who won 2 GSs at 36 and 1 at 37.
Just stop.Comment -
horja1SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-13-11
- 5646
#23Originally posted by nuxx??When both Nadal and Djokovic were dealing with an injury, what a coincidence. Don't you see the pattern here?
Just stop.Comment -
JaimeMiroSBR MVP
- 03-14-17
- 2515
#24Think the ATP is proving the goat argument to be stupid, sure most want a narrative that someone was better than the rest. No way I'm taking prime Fed over Nadal. Prime Djoko over Nadal? Close - wouldn't pick and would enjoy 5hrs of sheer brilliance. Nadal is 32/33 and has 3 less slams than Fed. Imagine if he's able to win tomorrow, the French open and somehow, also the US Open. What then?!Comment -
MiDNiTeSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-11-13
- 7684
#25Originally posted by JaimeMiroThink the ATP is proving the goat argument huto be stupid, sure most want a narrative that someone was better than the rest. No way I'm taking prime Fed over Nadal. Prime Djoko over Nadal? Close - wouldn't pick and would enjoy 5hrs of sheer brilliance. Nadal is 32/33 and has 3 less slams than Fed. Imagine if he's able to win tomorrow, the French open and somehow, also the US Open. What then?!Comment -
cincinnatikid513SBR Aristocracy
- 11-23-17
- 45360
#26i believe nadal would of passed fed by now if he didnt train so hard and go all out, if he would of trained like fed whos barely ever hurt, nadal would of passed fed easily, but nadal only knows 1 way 100 pct effort thats why his body is breaking down all the time and fed moves across the court like a gazelleComment -
MiDNiTeSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-11-13
- 7684
#27How many times joker or Rafa stop each other one day when the big 3 is gone some guy is going to win all the slamsComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code