Pouille OVER 12.5 Games is +$$$$???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • funnyb25
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 07-09-09
    • 39663

    #1
    Pouille OVER 12.5 Games is +$$$$???
    This seems too easy. I mean, he can get swept 6-4 6-4 7-5 and the bet is a winner. He wins a set it's pretty much a winner. Is this really THAT big of a demolishing in the making to where he won't even be competitive?? 12.5 games for Pouille seems really low to me....
  • MiDNiTe
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 11-11-13
    • 7684

    #2
    If u think pouille wins that much games isn't over 30.5 or 31.5 better?
    Comment
    • cincinnatikid513
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 11-23-17
      • 45360

      #3
      ohh boy
      Comment
      • nuxx??
        SBR Sharp
        • 06-06-17
        • 473

        #4
        People don't listen. Overvaluing poullies win against below medicre Raonic when he's playing against a GOAT.. Yikes.
        Comment
        • horja1
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 01-13-11
          • 5646

          #5
          Originally posted by nuxx??
          People don't listen. Overvaluing poullies win against below medicre Raonic when he's playing against a GOAT.. Yikes.
          You got it wrong. He is not playing against Federer.
          Comment
          • nuxx??
            SBR Sharp
            • 06-06-17
            • 473

            #6
            Originally posted by horja1
            You got it wrong. He is not playing against Federer.
            If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.
            Comment
            • DavidGoliath5003
              SBR MVP
              • 03-20-18
              • 4100

              #7
              Originally posted by nuxx??
              If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.
              My thoughts as well
              Comment
              • badgerguy
                SBR MVP
                • 03-21-13
                • 2281

                #8
                Those were two of the most pathetic grand slam semi final matches ever. Holy shit.
                Comment
                • cincinnatikid513
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 11-23-17
                  • 45360

                  #9
                  Originally posted by badgerguy
                  Those were two of the most pathetic grand slam semi final matches ever. Holy shit.
                  feel bad for the people who paid good money to watch those
                  Comment
                  • JaimeMiro
                    SBR MVP
                    • 03-14-17
                    • 2515

                    #10
                    Originally posted by horja1
                    You got it wrong. He is not playing against Federer.
                    Only reason Federer is a goat, is cause of grass. Nah, seriously, the goat argument doesn't hold water when you've got 3 players that have lights out dominated this era. I wouldn't even give Fed the edge because of the # of Slams...
                    Nadal, Djoko at their best just didn't have competition. Name one time someone beat Nadal on his favorite slam in a final?
                    Comment
                    • DavidGoliath5003
                      SBR MVP
                      • 03-20-18
                      • 4100

                      #11
                      I guess per years in Nadal would be the Goat, then Djokovic followed by Federer. Federers style is easy on the body which makes him in the running to be the goat... hes naturally talented
                      Comment
                      • JaimeMiro
                        SBR MVP
                        • 03-14-17
                        • 2515

                        #12
                        True, we've been blessed. Which is why things like goat get lost in translation; they're all goats in their own right. For all we know, Fed and Nadal would've retired in 2014/2015 and yet here we are...
                        Comment
                        • MalikHusam
                          SBR MVP
                          • 09-07-16
                          • 2701

                          #13
                          Originally posted by nuxx??
                          If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.
                          yes but if you ask djokovic federer and nadal to pick the greatest player in the past 15 years among all ATP players

                          can't pick yourself

                          both nadal and djokovic pick federer, no questions about it
                          Comment
                          • jjgold
                            SBR Aristocracy
                            • 07-20-05
                            • 388179

                            #14
                            Originally posted by MalikHusam
                            yes but if you ask djokovic federer and nadal to pick the greatest player in the past 15 years among all ATP players

                            can't pick yourself

                            both nadal and djokovic pick federer, no questions about it
                            lol they do that out of respect

                            Nadal and Joker better big match players
                            Comment
                            • MalikHusam
                              SBR MVP
                              • 09-07-16
                              • 2701

                              #15
                              Originally posted by jjgold
                              lol they do that out of respect

                              Nadal and Joker better big match players
                              bullcrap


                              you realize how much older he is?
                              Comment
                              • funnyb25
                                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                • 07-09-09
                                • 39663

                                #16
                                Tremendous work guys!
                                Comment
                                • DavidGoliath5003
                                  SBR MVP
                                  • 03-20-18
                                  • 4100

                                  #17
                                  After thinking about it more Federer has to be the Goat.. do you really see djokovic in the Top 3 6 years from now? Or Nadal in the top 3 4 years from now. I forget how old roger is sometimes. I think we all do
                                  Comment
                                  • bruceBRUCEbruce
                                    SBR MVP
                                    • 06-20-09
                                    • 2560

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by nuxx??
                                    If Federer didn't play in an era without competition (2004-2008), he wouldn't have half the career he's had.
                                    half the reason why there was no "competition" is because Feds was so dominant in that era
                                    he won majors against agassi, rafa, roddick, and djokovic during that time
                                    Comment
                                    • nuxx??
                                      SBR Sharp
                                      • 06-06-17
                                      • 473

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by bruceBRUCEbruce
                                      half the reason why there was no "competition" is because Feds was so dominant in that era
                                      he won majors against agassi, rafa, roddick, and djokovic during that time
                                      Against 34 year old Agassi who hasnt aged as well as Fed is aging? Nadal who was not a threat on any non clay court and who needed couple of years to adjust? Djokovic who was a fukking teenager at the age of 19? Get the fukk out. I can't belive you actually put roddick in the same sentence with the big 3.

                                      Saying roddick was a competition is like saying Nishikori/Berdych/Tsonga/Cilic are competition to big 3. No they aren't, they're 2 tiers below them.

                                      How can you consider someone a GOAT after winning two slams in 7 years period (2010-2016) is beyond me.
                                      Comment
                                      • DavidGoliath5003
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 03-20-18
                                        • 4100

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by nuxx??
                                        Against 34 year old Agassi who hasnt aged as well as Fed is aging? Nadal who was not a threat on any non clay court and who needed couple of years to adjust? Djokovic who was a fukking teenager at the age of 19? Get the fukk out. I can't belive you actually put roddick in the same sentence with the big 3.

                                        Saying roddick was a competition is like saying Nishikori/Berdych/Tsonga/Cilic are competition to big 3. No they aren't, they're 2 tiers below them.

                                        How can you consider someone a GOAT after winning two slams in 7 years period (2010-2016) is beyond me.
                                        Yeah i didnt realize how many federer won prior to the big guys
                                        Comment
                                        • horja1
                                          SBR Hall of Famer
                                          • 01-13-11
                                          • 5646

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by nuxx??
                                          Against 34 year old Agassi who hasnt aged as well as Fed is aging? Nadal who was not a threat on any non clay court and who needed couple of years to adjust? Djokovic who was a fukking teenager at the age of 19? Get the fukk out. I can't belive you actually put roddick in the same sentence with the big 3.

                                          Saying roddick was a competition is like saying Nishikori/Berdych/Tsonga/Cilic are competition to big 3. No they aren't, they're 2 tiers below them.

                                          How can you consider someone a GOAT after winning two slams in 7 years period (2010-2016) is beyond me.
                                          Love how age is an argument against Federer, who won 2 GSs at 36 and 1 at 37.
                                          Comment
                                          • nuxx??
                                            SBR Sharp
                                            • 06-06-17
                                            • 473

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by horja1
                                            Love how age is an argument against Federer, who won 2 GSs at 36 and 1 at 37.
                                            When both Nadal and Djokovic were dealing with an injury, what a coincidence. Don't you see the pattern here?
                                            Just stop.
                                            Comment
                                            • horja1
                                              SBR Hall of Famer
                                              • 01-13-11
                                              • 5646

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by nuxx??
                                              When both Nadal and Djokovic were dealing with an injury, what a coincidence. Don't you see the pattern here?
                                              Just stop.
                                              You should at least check your facts: 2017 AO was won 3-2 against Nadal who was very fit during the final.
                                              Comment
                                              • JaimeMiro
                                                SBR MVP
                                                • 03-14-17
                                                • 2515

                                                #24
                                                Think the ATP is proving the goat argument to be stupid, sure most want a narrative that someone was better than the rest. No way I'm taking prime Fed over Nadal. Prime Djoko over Nadal? Close - wouldn't pick and would enjoy 5hrs of sheer brilliance. Nadal is 32/33 and has 3 less slams than Fed. Imagine if he's able to win tomorrow, the French open and somehow, also the US Open. What then?!
                                                Comment
                                                • MiDNiTe
                                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                                  • 11-11-13
                                                  • 7684

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by JaimeMiro
                                                  Think the ATP is proving the goat argument huto be stupid, sure most want a narrative that someone was better than the rest. No way I'm taking prime Fed over Nadal. Prime Djoko over Nadal? Close - wouldn't pick and would enjoy 5hrs of sheer brilliance. Nadal is 32/33 and has 3 less slams than Fed. Imagine if he's able to win tomorrow, the French open and somehow, also the US Open. What then?!
                                                  This match is huge for each of their dynasties
                                                  Comment
                                                  • cincinnatikid513
                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                    • 11-23-17
                                                    • 45360

                                                    #26
                                                    i believe nadal would of passed fed by now if he didnt train so hard and go all out, if he would of trained like fed whos barely ever hurt, nadal would of passed fed easily, but nadal only knows 1 way 100 pct effort thats why his body is breaking down all the time and fed moves across the court like a gazelle
                                                    Comment
                                                    • MiDNiTe
                                                      SBR Hall of Famer
                                                      • 11-11-13
                                                      • 7684

                                                      #27
                                                      How many times joker or Rafa stop each other one day when the big 3 is gone some guy is going to win all the slams
                                                      Comment
                                                      Search
                                                      Collapse
                                                      SBR Contests
                                                      Collapse
                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                      Collapse
                                                      Working...