Hi,
I am a tennis better and my brain is currently testing 48 different Tennis-Bet-Strategies with virtual money to find one that produces $$$ in the long run.

I am tracking all strategies with an excel bettracker which is even with copy and paste really a pain in the a** to fill it all out.
But hey, fom nothing comes nothing right?
Heres my question to experienced bettors:
How many games are needed to see if a strategy makes a longterm profit and to restart it with real money?
I personally thought about 1.000 games to close it if its produces a negative profit or reopen a strategy with real money if its produces profit after 1.000 games.
Is this to less or to much? Could one see a tendecy if 100 games are evaluated? Or is this way too early to see in which directon a strategy leans?
I would really appreciate any help on this topic.
greetings,
Noriodie

I am a tennis better and my brain is currently testing 48 different Tennis-Bet-Strategies with virtual money to find one that produces $$$ in the long run.


I am tracking all strategies with an excel bettracker which is even with copy and paste really a pain in the a** to fill it all out.

But hey, fom nothing comes nothing right?

Heres my question to experienced bettors:
How many games are needed to see if a strategy makes a longterm profit and to restart it with real money?
I personally thought about 1.000 games to close it if its produces a negative profit or reopen a strategy with real money if its produces profit after 1.000 games.

Is this to less or to much? Could one see a tendecy if 100 games are evaluated? Or is this way too early to see in which directon a strategy leans?
I would really appreciate any help on this topic.

greetings,
Noriodie

