I recently filed a complaint against islandcasino.com and wondered what the public thought?
I deposited $500+$51 fees by Western Union with islandcasino.com. I received a 50% cash bonus with the following terms:
50% initial bonus. When playing in the sportsbook clients will be required to wager 7 times, when playing in the casino and/or sportsbook clients will be required to wager 30 times their initial deposit + bonus + fees BEFORE
requesting a payout.
I feel that the terms are ambiguous. I inferred that players had a choice to
either meet the rollover requirements either 7 times in the sportsbook or 30
times in a combination of sportsbook and casino. The way islandcasino interprets
the statement is that even if you meet the 7 times rollover in the sportsbook
alone but you play even one once in the casino then you must meet the 30 times
rollover even though you had more than 7 times the rollover in the sportsbook
alone.
Currently i am a couple hundred dollars away from meeting the 7 times rollover
with sports wagers alone, but i did play quite a bit of blackjack. I am told
that i must rollover my DEPOSIT($500), FEES($51), and BONUS($250) 30 times before i can get a payout. I feel this is unfair to theoretically make a person who makes 7 times the D.F.B. in sports wagers, but plays in the casino to meet a 30 times rollover requirement. How does playing in casino give a player so much of an advantage that he or she should have to wager an additional 23 times his or her D.F.B.? I could see how only playing in the casino only would warrant a 30 times rollover, but if you can meet a requirement for sportbook only wagers,
then how does playing in the casino make you have to wager 23 times more?
This interpretation by them seems upsurd.
Islandcasino.com has the house edge in casino games so by me playing in the
casino in addition to meeting the 7 times sports wagers give them more of a
theoretical advantage than if i just met the 7 times sports wagers rollover
with no casino play.
I deposited $500+$51 fees by Western Union with islandcasino.com. I received a 50% cash bonus with the following terms:
50% initial bonus. When playing in the sportsbook clients will be required to wager 7 times, when playing in the casino and/or sportsbook clients will be required to wager 30 times their initial deposit + bonus + fees BEFORE
requesting a payout.
I feel that the terms are ambiguous. I inferred that players had a choice to
either meet the rollover requirements either 7 times in the sportsbook or 30
times in a combination of sportsbook and casino. The way islandcasino interprets
the statement is that even if you meet the 7 times rollover in the sportsbook
alone but you play even one once in the casino then you must meet the 30 times
rollover even though you had more than 7 times the rollover in the sportsbook
alone.
Currently i am a couple hundred dollars away from meeting the 7 times rollover
with sports wagers alone, but i did play quite a bit of blackjack. I am told
that i must rollover my DEPOSIT($500), FEES($51), and BONUS($250) 30 times before i can get a payout. I feel this is unfair to theoretically make a person who makes 7 times the D.F.B. in sports wagers, but plays in the casino to meet a 30 times rollover requirement. How does playing in casino give a player so much of an advantage that he or she should have to wager an additional 23 times his or her D.F.B.? I could see how only playing in the casino only would warrant a 30 times rollover, but if you can meet a requirement for sportbook only wagers,
then how does playing in the casino make you have to wager 23 times more?
This interpretation by them seems upsurd.
Islandcasino.com has the house edge in casino games so by me playing in the
casino in addition to meeting the 7 times sports wagers give them more of a
theoretical advantage than if i just met the 7 times sports wagers rollover
with no casino play.