Does he not care bout these tourneys? Is father time catching up too him? He justLost to Coric whos pretty good but nowhere near feds level and he almost lost in the early part of this tourny too.Hoping he just trying to figure it out after taking off the clay season and just rusty.
-
-
Coric played great
If you watch tennis Fed has been taken deep in many matches lately
Getting older and slowerComment -
oldyComment -
Fed is winding it down
Grand Slams are all that matter (sans French)
The 1000 tourneys are a goodwill gesture and nothing more
All about training and saving what limited bullets he has left for Wimbledon and USOpenComment -
Fed wants to win every match he plays even exhibitions it is why he is greatest ever
He got beat by a better player todayComment -
Comment -
Nino correct
Idiots think players do not try in any event but majors
Lol all best players ever dominated every eventComment -
Its going to be difficult for Fed to win back-to-back tourneys in consecutive weeks again. He got outplayed in almost all extended rallies today. Sign of fatigue. He showed signs of it with an early exit in Miami this year.Comment -
Fed stunk this entire week. He was needing to win 7 games a set vs some Challenger level mugs. Should have lost to Paire. I'd be surprised if Roger wins Wimbledon. The favorite should be Cilic or Kygrios (if he has his head on straight). Best servers should run thru grass easy.Comment -
i remember nadal lost before the french open and wasn't looking that great, then he steam rolled everyone in paris, don't count out the fed on grass he only has 8 wimbledonsComment -
Fading Federer after his layoff was gold. He was far from convincing. It started with Misha Zverev winning the first set.
Maybe Fedex playing with the brakes on. Can't risk getting injured at this age with Wimbledon around the corner.
Coric finaly got the outright ml job done though...proving he can mentally handle a W over Fedex on his record...but in the past 2 weeks that could have easily been Gunneswaran lol.Comment -
Roger lost one match since he’s been back LOL a lot of amateurs hereComment -
I won with Coric ml but I started with Zverev ml. Ending up break-even on this betting plan. Fukking Paire missed two matchpoints! Had him at +2500 live after being down a set!Comment -
whats wrong with you? he just won the other tourny and he made it all the way to the final. get some knowledge. thats not easy to do.Comment -
Wait for +250 odds to win Wimbledon and bet biggggComment -
He has been going very deep in a lot of games which is not a good sign I don’t think he’ll win Wimbleton
Comment -
He’s fine.Comment -
Dealing with that extra Mirka weight wearing him downComment -
Guy basically took off 3 months and still doesn't look that sharp. I'm sure Wimbledon is top priority for him but I'm certainly fading him throughout where it makes sense. I don't see him winning it.Comment -
I've been saying for years that the top players only care about the slams because that's where u rack up cash and trophies. Rafa lost to thiem in Rome on clay and people worried but I told them he'd run everyone off the clay in France and he did.
So I'll say it again. The top players only care about the slams.Comment -
this was literaly the dumbest threat starter i have ever seen. guy skips clay seasons comes into grass winning a tourny and making a final. and the guy asks whats wrong with him
doesent get any more pathetic than that.
Comment -
Didn’t he lose in the first round in a grass event leading up to Wimbledon last year? I wouldn’t worry about Federer. If you’re fading him because he’s overpriced then that’s one thing but I wouldn’t fade him based on some notion that he’s not in form. He’s 36 so he could just not have it on any given day but I still think he takes home another Wimbledon title.Comment -
dude is 2 mos from being 37 years old and dude's are questioning him losing in some no name grass tourney that deep down inside he does not give two fukks about. if today's match was wimbledon against that same guy coric, fed wins in 3 max 4 sets lmaoComment -
The guy is 37 and just took 3 months off and wins his first tourney back then loses in a final a week later. So basically he came back ice cold from competition and reeled off 8 or 9 wins in a row.
The court he kept playing on was beat to shit and there were 2 injury retirements due to slips and falls on it on it the previous 2 or 3 days (Bautista-agut and drawing a blank on the other one maybe Fucsovics). It was almost unplayable conditions IMO after 2 people busted ass like they did.
If you think Federer is going 110% in a 500ATP event on a poorly conditioned court you're a moron.
Clueless jerkoffs talking tennis who watch it 4 times a year.
There's only 2 people I'd give a very minuscule chance of beating him- Cilic or Zverev. When I say minuscule I mean almost no chance like a LLoyd Christmas-Mary Swanson chance from Dumb & Dumber.
Kyrgios can never make it deep enough in best of 5's or I'd say he could.
He'll win a couple matches then eventually see a fan eating an ice cream cone improperly during a changeover and go on tilt and give up.
Feds will win Wimbledon and probably easily.
You can probably find a prop somewhere of him losing under 1 1/2 or 2 sets for the tournament and get some good plus money on it.
I don't even think he lost one last year in it.Comment -
Betting on 37 yr olds in tennis is quite foolish. The only exception to this rule is Serena and she’s half man at least so she doesn’t count.Comment -
He’s won 2 tourneys in the last year. He’s lost as a big favorite many times other times.
Lost to Del Potro twice.
Lost to Zverev
Lost to Goffin
Lost to Haas
Lost to Donskoy
Lost to Kokkinakis.
Lost to Coric
Lost to Anderson.
If you want a sure bet, that’s Rafa on clay. Nothing else in tennis at the moment.
Roger has had some terrible losses since he turned 35. The gutless coward doesn’t even play clay because he knows he has no chance.Comment -
Joker wins this,then Joker or fed wins us openComment
