Test: what is wrong with this article?

[daneblazer]

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/23645045/nfl-win-total-projections-all-32-teams-2018

Well Maybe several things, but whats the most glaring thing wrong?

Winner gets 25 points

[cincinnatikid513]

guy picked over on 29 of the 32 teams which seems impossible to be correct

[daneblazer]

Correct. It’s like he got to the end of the article and said oh shit i Better have some teams go under


Makes you wonder about the Amount of thought “experts” put in these things

[cincinnatikid513]

Correct. It’s like he got to the end of the article and said oh shit i Better have some teams go under

Makes you wonder about the Amount of thought “experts” put in these things

espn has to save some money they are paying the getup crew 14.5 million dollar salary

[jjgold]

no time for trivia bs

[cincinnatikid513]

no time for trivia bs

wheres your potm video, do your job sammy should win

[darrell74]

Their decimal points for wins is phuckin retarded
9.9 wins for Phily. The 4 letter network can be so dumb, sometimes.

[BigdaddyQH]

Their decimal points for wins is phuckin retarded
9.9 wins for Phily. The 4 letter network can be so dumb, sometimes.

The four letter network IS so dumb MOST of the time.

[cincinnatikid513]

when will espn get smart and have a gambling show go over the lines for the day maybe they could even get 70's porn star loshak to host

[dlowilly]

guy picked over on 29 of the 32 teams which seems impossible to be correct

Depends on the odds

If the pass line in craps paid +105 and the don't pass line paid +105 you win more in the long run betting both even though one has to lose every time

I doubt they got +ev odds every bet here I'm just saying it isn't necessarily wrong

[SharpAngles]

The most glaring wrong in this whole deal is that daneblazer reads articles on espn.com

[cincinnatikid513]

Depends on the odds

If the pass line in craps paid +105 and the don't pass line paid +105 you win more in the long run betting both even though one has to lose every time

I doubt they got +ev odds every bet here I'm just saying it isn't necessarily wrong

there is no way 29 of 32 teams can all go over win prediction not every team can have a winning record or close to it

[daneblazer]

The most glaring wrong in this whole deal is that daneblazer reads articles on espn.com

This was actually sent to me from our old friend Lowly Oaftard

[dlowilly]

there is no way 29 of 32 teams can all go over win prediction not every team can have a winning record or close to it

And there is no way the pass line and the don't pass line can both win, but if the odds are right you should bet both of them

If odds on every over offered was 5% +ev you should bet all 32

[daneblazer]

I think if everyone just goes one game over and the under teams don’t win a single games, that’s 255 wins. Not sure where they’re all coming from

[Harry N. Lloyd]

That was a lot of work, Dane. What is this, a scavenger hunt?

[BigdaddyQH]

Depends on the odds

If the pass line in craps paid +105 and the don't pass line paid +105 you win more in the long run betting both even though one has to lose every time

I doubt they got +ev odds every bet here I'm just saying it isn't necessarily wrong

That is why they have the "Bar 12". To break up the odds. I think that someone just failed to pay attention to what they were doing, a trait not new to ESPN.

[dlowilly]

That is why they have the "Bar 12". To break up the odds. I think that someone just failed to pay attention to what they were doing, a trait not new to ESPN.

No that +105 is including the bar 12

Yes on rare occasion you would roll a 12 coming out and your don't pas would go on to lose but that doesn't wipe out the edge of +105 odds in the long run

If there are multiple +ev bets you want to get money on all of them even if they compete with eachother. Another example would be if roulette numbers paid 40 to 1. You wouldn't want to bet just one number even though only one number can hit and a zero makes them all lose.