Why was there no PAT at the end of Bowling Green vs Toledo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UncleG
    SBR Rookie
    • 06-28-17
    • 2

    #1
    Why was there no PAT at the end of Bowling Green vs Toledo
    BG scored a TD as time expired, shouldnt there have been an untimed PAT attempt?
  • Kermit
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 09-27-10
    • 32555

    #2
    It's a goofy NCAA rule. It wouldn't have affected the outcome of the game.
    Comment
    • funnyb25
      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
      • 07-09-09
      • 39663

      #3
      According to the NCAA’s rules, if a touchdown is scored as time expires, the period can be extended for a try except if it happens in the fourth period and the points would not affect the outcome of the game.
      If you’re really into rules and the NCAA’s definition these are the rules:
      RULE 3, SECTION 2 ARTICLE 3.C
      Extension of Periods

      ARTICLE 3. a. A period shall be extended for an untimed down if one or more of the following occurs during a down in which time expires (A.R. 3-2-3-I-VIII):

      c. If a touchdown is scored during a down in which time expires, the period is extended for the try (Exception: Rule 8-3-2-a).
      RULE 8 SECTION 3 ARTICLE 2.A.
      Opportunity to Score
      ARTICLE 2. A try is an opportunity for either team to score one or two points while the game clock is stopped after a touchdown. It is a special interval in the game which, for purposes of penalty enforcement only, includes both a down and the “ready’’ period that precedes it.
      a. The ball shall be put in play by the team that scored a six-point touchdown. If a touchdown is scored during a down in which time in the fourth period expires, the try shall not be attempted unless the point(s) would affect the outcome of the game.
      Comment
      • PeterJohnson
        Restricted User
        • 10-10-17
        • 908

        #4
        So this is where you feel the need to make a post? drawing the line here i see
        Comment
        • SportsMushroom
          SBR MVP
          • 09-28-10
          • 4177

          #5
          it was a conspiracy so that all the people that had bet the under 103.5 -100000000 could cash in
          Comment
          • xKMACKx
            SBR MVP
            • 11-16-08
            • 1274

            #6
            it's the same rule in the NFL, for instance OT, if it the XP doesn't impact the outcome they don't kick it.
            Comment
            • xKMACKx
              SBR MVP
              • 11-16-08
              • 1274

              #7
              Originally posted by SportsMushroom
              it was a conspiracy so that all the people that had bet the under 103.5 -100000000 could cash in
              Comment
              • Foxx
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 05-25-11
                • 5832

                #8
                Remember the crazy finish to the Redskins/Chiefs game? KC got the the fluke defensive TD at the end of the 4th with no time left. Everyone was celebrating the win and people were running onto the field, but they made the offense come out on the field to at least snap the ball for the PAT.
                Comment
                • KVB
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 05-29-14
                  • 74817

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SportsMushroom
                  it was a conspiracy so that all the people that had bet the under 103.5 -100000000 could cash in
                  Comment
                  • mrpapageorgio
                    SBR MVP
                    • 09-07-17
                    • 2974

                    #10
                    So I guess they don't consider covering the spread/point total as affecting the outcome of the game?
                    Comment
                    Search
                    Collapse
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...