Trump Fires 50 Missiles Into Syria tonight

[indio]

Only took the Zionists 2 months to put Trump under their thumb. So much for draining the swamp. Just another Jewish and Saudi puppet. Thought Trump might have a little backbone with all the anti-NATO rhetoric and calling regime changes and our invasions of Iraq and Libya disasters during the campaign. Knew we might be in trouble when Zionist stooge Tillerson was made Secretary of State. We knew Hillary was an internationalist, and most of the neo-con GOP was too, but Trump seemed like something different, something new. So much for that, turns out he's just a wet noodle.

If only we had attacked Israel this quickly when they attacked us 50 years ago when they were in a war with Syria and tried yet another false flag to drag us into their wars as mercenaries.

[indio]

The only people mad are Russia, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, Rand Paul, d2bets, jtoler, and thor.

And all the Syrian Christians and Shia that Assad protects from Wahhabi Sunni barbarians that have been killing innocent people there, all while being funded and armed by Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the CIA so they can install a friendly puppet they can control. Sad that people like you are so stupid and cheerlead while Jewish and Saudi funded Al-Qaida rebels slaughter and kill Christians.

Anyone who's dumb enough to think Assad would gas his own people, when it's an obvious ruse, should be put on a sterilization list. It's amazing, the build up with Haley making speeches at the UN was just like when Colin Powell did the same thing before we attacked and invaded Iraq on a similar false intelligence disinformation campaign. How'd that turn out? I thought Trump said that was mistake during the campaign? Guess he just talked a good game to get elected by people sick and tired of neo-con Republicans and bolshevik internationalist Democrats.

Don't kid yourself boy, there are a LOT of people not happy with Trump caving to international Jewry. People have had it with these 2 faced Zionist snakes running propaganda narratives with their phony "intelligence" reports that end up getting a lot of people killed so they can play musical chairs with every arab leader in the region to fit their own interests.

[Cuse0323]

And all the Syrian Christians and Shia that Assad protects from Wahhabi Sunni barbarians that have been killing innocent people there, all while being funded and armed by Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the CIA so they can install a friendly puppet they can control. Sad that people like you are so stupid and cheerlead while Jewish and Saudi funded Al-Qaida rebels slaughter and kill Christians.

Anyone who's dumb enough to think Assad would gas his own people, when it's an obvious ruse, should be put on a sterilization list. It's amazing, the build up with Haley making speeches at the UN was just like when Colin Powell did the same thing before we attacked and invaded Iraq on a similar false intelligence disinformation campaign. How'd that turn out? I thought Trump said that was mistake during the campaign? Guess he just talked a good game to get elected by people sick and tired of neo-con Republicans and bolshevik internationalist Democrats.

Don't kid yourself boy, there are a LOT of people not happy with Trump caving to international Jewry. People have had it with these 2 faced Zionist snakes running propaganda narratives with their phony "intelligence" reports that end up getting a lot of people killed so they can play musical chairs with every arab leader in the region to fit their own interests.

I'm far from cheerleading. It's a difficult situation. I think you're a bit on the extreme side of it. You know, with the whole Zionist propaganda. I'm not big into trusting politicians, but have no problem with this. It was a minimal attack on an airbase. I'm sure plenty more are mad. That was just my shortlist, as this is a gambling forum.

This isn't WWIII, or even a war. The war is in Syria between all the factions based there, or nearby. We will see what happens. What does Trump have to gain to be just another puppet? He chose the route of least aggression, besides doing nothing. I guess I'm dumb enough to think Assad gassed his own people.

No worries on sterilization. The women don't like me enough to reproduce anyway, so you can rest easy.

I'd rather not argue, as we both have the same foreign intelligence as one another. I don't think this should be forecasted as another Iraq though. That's for sure.

[Kermit]

Anyone who's dumb enough to think Assad would gas his own people, when it's an obvious ruse, should be put on a sterilization list.

You know, it's not much of a stretch considering they just used chemical weapons only a few years ago that killed over 1,000 people.

[Russian Rocket]

You know, it's not much of a stretch considering they just used chemical weapons only a few years ago that killed over 1,000 people.

Kermit ask yourself why Assad, who's forces are on major offense right now, with plenty of fire power support from the Russians, out of nowhere for the first time in 4 years needed to use chemical agent against a small group of civilian people?

Then when you answer that question, ask yourself, how in the world without any boots on the ground, it only took US a day to determine, without shadow of a doubt, that it was in fact him who used those chemical weapons?

...and not only determine that, but also quickly send 59 missiles to an empty airfield and kill about dozen, mostly civilian people in the villages nearby?

I wanna know how the fukk do you guys put these things together in your heads?

[Cuse0323]

So, who did it?

Everyone seems to have intelligence on the situation as they sit on the computer. I don't see why Assad would, but who did then?

[Russian Rocket]

So, who did it?

Everyone seems to have intelligence on the situation as they sit on the computer. I don't see why Assad would, but who did then?

It's been said already for many years that ISIS and terrorist groups alike over there have access to chemical weapons.

Sarin is odorless and colorless agent, that can be released by a bomb and you wouldn't even know that it's there.

Russians said that Syrian forces hit a chemical factory near by - no one bothered to check on that.

You guys kill hundreds and hundreds of innocent people and it takes you MONTHS to admit that you actually did it (by mistake of course).

And here we have a fkng 24 hour turnaround in investigation and punishment, without any investigators on the ground.

Doesn't it sound silly to you?

[Cuse0323]

Who had the planes to drop the Sarin gas? Or where did the planes come from? Who was supposed to clear out the chemical weapons?

We surely aren't innocent in the past. But, I doubt that ISIS was dropping gas. They need to steal trucks to kill a few people. It was a minor strike reacting to an atrocity. I think the US intel knows who did it better than us.

False flag, though. Sure thing. Syria is committing genocide, and we bomb an airbase. One is not like the other.

[Russian Rocket]

Who had the planes to drop the Sarin gas? Or where did the planes come from? Who was supposed to clear out the chemical weapons?

We surely aren't innocent in the past. But, I doubt that ISIS was dropping gas. They need to steal trucks to kill a few people. It was a minor strike reacting to an atrocity. I think the US intel knows who did it better than us.

False flag, though. Sure thing. Syria is committing genocide, and we bomb an airbase. One is not like the other.

Again, you don't have to physically drop any bombs to release this agent. You can detonate a bomb on the ground or like in this case they claim, hit a chemical factory .

And why does it take months for your fabulous intel to admit that they "accidentally" kill civilians with their airstrikes and here you spend less, than a day at pretending to investigate this accident?

[Cuse0323]

Again, you don't have to physically drop any bombs to release this agent. You can detonate a bomb on the ground or like in this case they claim, hit a chemical factory .

And why does it take months for your fabulous intel to admit that they "accidentally" kill civilians with their airstrikes and here you spend less, than a day at pretending to investigate this accident?

So those drones around the area of attack had nothing to do with this chemical weapons attacks, or cover-up? Gotcha.

We can get into "accidentally" killing civilians all we want. Let's throw the Ukraine, and Crimea into the mix then.

[Russian Rocket]

So those drones around the area of attack had nothing to do with this chemical weapons attacks, or cover-up? Gotcha.

We can get into "accidentally" killing civilians all we want. Let's throw the Ukraine, and Crimea into the mix then.

Sure let's do that...Crimea has over 96% of ethnic Russian population, that...drum roll please...went to the polling stations and said that we don't wanna be slathered by Nazi Uks and voted to be part of Russia.

What does it tell you, when people go and vote for something?

You can switch topics all you want, but that is not going to change the fact that your planes killed over 300 civilians (100 kids included) just in the month of March of this year...and YOU...another drum roll please...didn't make a BEEP about it on this board.

You are however, sit here and without any shadow of a doubt, criticize Syrian government for using Sarin, without...one last drum roll please...ANYONE doing ANY type of formal investigation.

[MiDNiTe]

i dunno if syria government did it but the concenus around the world is they did do it

[Cuse0323]

Sure let's do that...Crimea has over 96% of ethnic Russian population, that...drum roll please...went to the polling stations and said that we don't wanna be slathered by Nazi Uks and voted to be part of Russia.

What does it tell you, when people go and vote for something?

You can switch topics all you want, but that is not going to change the fact that your planes killed over 300 civilians (100 kids included) just in the month of March of this year...and YOU...another drum roll please...didn't make a BEEP about it on this board.

You are however, sit here and without any shadow of a doubt, criticize Syrian government for using Sarin, without...one last drum roll please...ANYONE doing ANY type of formal investigation.

I didn't do shit. Let's investigate the obvious, and be like Obama. Just let Syria continue to kill their people. The only countries that are mad are Iran, Russia, and Syria. Does that not tell you anything? Russia isn't even all that mad behind the scenes. Obama isn't around anymore.

I would like to know how this investigation you speak of would have even happened? They weren't supposed to have shit because you guys took care of it.

Nazi Uks.

Hey whatever you gotta tell yourself about screwing the Ukraine.

[Russian Rocket]

I would like to know how this investigation you speak of would have even happened?

You send investigators on the ground to examine people who got exposed to sarin, look for fragments of a bomb that you claim Syrians had dropped, take samples...you know little things like that, that investigators usually do BEFORE they start showering another country with tomahawks while killing more innocent people in the process.

I didn't do shit.

well...that's a fkng shocker!

[Cuse0323]

You send investigators on the ground to examine people who got exposed to sarin, look for fragments of a bomb that you claim Syrians had dropped, take samples...you know little things like that, that investigators usually do BEFORE they start showering another country with tomahawks while killing more innocent people in the process.




well...that's a fkng shocker!

Hah. You got me. I'm a bum, that's well known.

We blew up an airbase and killed what, six people? Not even close to the gas attack on the people that killed almost 100. Shit, we even gave you guys a heads up. You could have told the Syrians at the base to get out.

[bigtymer56]

He's not dumber than you, so you're fine.

I get that he has changed his mind on a lot of things. I'll never understand why that is a bad thing is all. Shouldn't we want the people in charge to change their mind when given information?

The whole flip flopping thing cracks me up. I want someone who adjusts, and doesn't just stick to what they once said. That's why I like him. He doesn't just go with what he said during a campaign, or beforehand.

Things change, and justifiable so, people change their mind. I guess he could just let the world burn because he said he didn't want to police the world.

Those against him will say he should do something, then when he does they call him a hypocrite. If he did nothing, then he's just a terrible leader. He can't win.

..get the penetrate out of here with this. You're guy does it and now flip-flopping is a great thing. Cut the bs man.

[Cuse0323]

..get the penetrate out of here with this. You're guy does it and now flip-flopping is a great thing. Cut the bs man.

Your*

And I'm always alright with changing your mind based on information. He's not my guy, but he's my President. I'd rather have someone who is flexible, and not stubborn. You know, based on what happens around the world.

[Russian Rocket]

Hah. You got me. I'm a bum, that's well known.

We blew up an airbase and killed what, six people? Not even close to the gas attack on the people that killed almost 100. Shit, we even gave you guys a heads up. You could have told the Syrians at the base to get out.

Cuser, 6 people are still 6 people...you can't just dispose them like garbage. Did they actually die, because of the Syrian gvmnt use of sarin or was it because Syrians blew up ISIS chemical factory?

[Cuse0323]

Cuser, 6 people are still 6 people...you can't just dispose them like garbage. Did they actually die, because of the Syrian gvmnt use of sarin or was it because Syrians blew up ISIS chemical factory?

All I know is that if a Sarin gas attack wasn't used then those six people are alive. Do you really believe Syrians blew up an ISIS chemical factory? If so, then we can argue in circles all day, but no point.

Oh yeah, and those near 100 people would be alive.

[Russian Rocket]

Do you really believe Syrians blew up an ISIS chemical factory?

Yes, because I don't see a reason on why Assad right now needs to use chemical weapons.
There is literally no reason for it.

[bigtymer56]

Wait hold up, Americans care about Syrians now?

....guess we'll be seeing some change in the refugee policy anytime now.

[Cuse0323]

Yes, because I don't see a reason on why Assad right now needs to use chemical weapons.
There is literally no reason for it.

Certainly makes no sense, but consistently killing your own people doesn't either. So, your guess is as good as mine. I'll roll with the President as this was long overdue regardless of how it happened.

[Russian Rocket]

Wait hold up, Americans care about Syrians now?

https://news.vice.com/story/us-airstrikes-have-killed-more-and-more-civilians-in-iraq-and-syria-since-trump-took-office

U.S. airstrikes have killed more and more civilians in Iraq and Syria since Trump took office

By Tim Hume on Mar 30, 2017

While on the campaign trail in late 2015, Donald Trump pledged to “bomb the shit” out of ISIS if he became president. Now, a couple of months after he took office, reports of civilian deaths from U.S. strikes in Syria and Iraq have hit an all-time high. Why exactly that is, however, remains unclear.
According to Airwars, a British monitoring group, alleged civilian casualties linked to U.S. strikes in Syria and Iraq have soared to 1,472 so far this month. In March of last year, 196 civilians were reported killed. The previous all-time high was 613 in January.
“This is worse than anything we have ever seen from the coalition, and it’s up there with the levels of allegations we saw against Russia a year ago,” said Chris Woods, the investigative journalist who heads Airwars. “Something is shifting — a lot more civilians are dying, and it’s happening on Donald Trump’s watch.”
The dramatic jump in civilian casualties could be the result of a directive from Trump to change risk/reward calculations when determining airstrikes, or it could be due to the war he inherited being at its deadly peak, when fighting against ISIS is taking place in the terrorist group’s stronghold of Mosul, where hundreds of thousands of civilians are trapped.
“All of this could be happening under Hillary Clinton,” Woods said. “It may have nothing to do with politics. It’s very hard to tell.”

The civilian death toll under Trump has been in the spotlight since the botched Jan. 29 raid in Yemen that resulted in the deaths of a Navy SEAL and at least 23 civilians. Since then, the U.S. military has been blamed for a string of high-profile attacks resulting in civilian casualties in Syria and Iraq as it pursues its war on ISIS.
These include reported attacks on a school and a mosque in Syria, and, most recently, a building in west Mosul where scores of civilians are reported to have died. The U.S. military is investigating these incidents.
Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, commander of America’s anti-ISIS campaign in Iraq and Syria known as Operation Inherent Resolve, said of the latter attack Tuesday that there was a “fair chance” a U.S. drone strike in the area had played a role in the civilian deaths. But he added that more complex explanations were also being investigated following reports that ISIS may have trapped civilians in the house and rigged it to explode, or that a secondary ISIS vehicle-bomb destroyed the property.
“I’ll say this, if we did it — and I’d say there’s at least a fair chance that we did — it was an unintentional accident of war and we will transparently report it to you when we’re ready,” Townsend said.

Business as usual?
U.S. military involvement in Iraq and Syria has been stepped up recently as the campaign against ISIS enters a critical phase. The U.S. has sent hundreds more military advisers into Iraq to help with the push to liberate western Mosul from ISIS following the successful campaign to drive the terrorists from the eastern half of their major stronghold.
“We are seeing an influx in troops with equipment such as artillery, and they are being moved closer to the front lines,” said Bill Roggio, editor of the Long War Journal, adding that Iraqi troops were reporting that it was easier for them to call for and receive close air support from U.S. planes.
Across the border in Syria, the U.S. has dramatically increased its activity as it closes in on Raqqa, capital of the Islamic State’s so-called caliphate; last week, the U.S. carried out an unprecedented air assault that involved U.S. helicopter landings to transport troops behind enemy lines.
And in Yemen, U.S. drone strikes have ramped up to new levels in the counterterror campaign there against al-Qaida.

In the wake of this increased deployment, Roggio and other observers have claimed that the U.S. has changed the way its fighting its adversaries, with the military showing less regard for preserving civilian life. “They’re going to say it’s business as usual, but I don’t think that’s really credible,” Roggio said. On Tuesday, both the U.N. and Amnesty International urged Iraqi and U.S.-led coalition forces to try harder to spare civilians.
The U.S. military insists nothing has changed in terms of its tolerance for civilian casualties. The military’s rules of engagement are classified, but Townsend said Tuesday there had been some “relatively minor adjustments” in December — before Trump came into office — that decentralized part of the process of approving fire missions as the campaign moved from a largely defensive campaign to an offensive one.
“We have had to return to what is our actual U.S. military war-fighting doctrine for offensive operations,” he said, adding that those changes were “not the cause of what we’re seeing right now.”
“What has not changed is our care, our caution, our applications of the rules of force, how and when we apply our combat power, our tolerance for… civilian casualties.”
Townsend cited the large numbers of civilians in Mosul who haven’t been able to leave or who are being held against their will as the reason for the high civilian toll — a plausible explanation in Iraq, according to analysts who spoke to VICE News.
During the first half of the battle for Mosul, which saw Iraqi coalition forces take the portion of the city east of the Tigris, Iraqi troops “paid a very high price,” Woods said. “One of the criticisms of the coalition was that the kind of airstrikes that Iraqi forces say they needed weren’t given to them, and therefore more Iraqi troops died than was necessary.”
“Part of what we’re seeing in west Mosul is a transferral of risk from military forces onto civilians. In west Mosul, we’re now more likely to see Iraqi forces call in an airstrike on a house than clear it with hand-to-hand fighting.
Anthony Cordesman, a Middle East expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that more aggressive U.S. air support in the battle for Mosul wouldn’t require any loosening of the rules of engagement, as they were already fairly flexible.
“The rules can’t be such that you can’t carry out military operations because you can’t be precise about the presence of civilians,” he said. “If you created a situation where you needed 100 percent assurance, you’d be saying that you couldn’t use airpower.”
Civilian casualties have proven a key factor in driving support for insurgent groups; images of the Yemen raid in January have already been featured in jihadi propaganda. The risk to civilians trapped in Mosul, thought to number 400,000, was increased by ISIS’ tactics, Cordesman said.
“You have an enemy that is using civilians as cover all the time.”

Alarm over Syrian casualties
The U.S. military’s explanations for civilian casualties appeared less plausible when it came to Syria, Woods says, where the recent spike in civilian deaths gave greater cause for concern.
Airwars has recorded a spike in fatalities from coalition airstrikes in villages and towns around Raqqa, as proxy ground forces advance to attempt to complete their encirclement of the city.
“That is much more troubling,” Woods said. “It’s not the densely packed areas where civilian casualties are inevitable — and where we would not have expected to see civilian casualties from coalition airstrikes even a couple of months ago, we’re now recording three, four, five alleged civilian fatality incidents every day now.”
He said the pattern suggested that the U.S. has “changed the way it’s conducting strikes, and that as a result of those changes, civilians are now significantly more at risk.” One factor, he said, could be the involvement of Kurdish ground forces unfamiliar with the area around Raqqa, who could potentially be misidentifying targets.
In Yemen, where CentCom says the U.S. has launched 23 drone strikes against al-Qaeda since Trump took office — comparable to all of 2016, when 27 were conducted — the rules surrounding the America’s military activities are different.
While Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan are designated “areas of active hostility,” counterterror drone strikes in undeclared battlefields such as Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan have so far required high-level approval under an Obama-era doctrine designed to rein in strikes outside active war zones.
Earlier this month, the Washington Post reported that the Trump administration had launched a near-complete review that could give the military more leeway to launch drone strikes in such countries. The new measures would reportedly lower the threshold on acceptable civilian casualties from a “near certainty” of no such deaths to “reasonable certainty” — although the Pentagon maintained the commitment to avoid civilian casualties would remain.
CNN reported that Trump had already approved the new rules in Yemen, and that this was the reason for the steep uptick in strikes. A Department of Defense spokesperson told VICE News that there had been “no change to our day-to-day authorities in Yemen.”

[Russian Rocket]

Certainly makes no sense, but consistently killing your own people doesn't either. So, your guess is as good as mine. I'll roll with the President as this was long overdue regardless of how it happened.

What exactly is long overdue and why? You're already killing hundreds of civilians each month over there...why do you need more?

[rkelly110]

Rocket boy getting his shit pushed in and does the ol' divert game.

Your country was responsible for getting rid of Assad's chemical weapons. Turns out, like normal, Putin lied. He has his hands in the cookie jar.

Yeah, the 1st time gas was used it could've been the rebels to create a false flag. Assad is playing on that this time.

Big deal. Trump warned you to pull out. He puts a few holes in some buildings for show. That's like me saying I'm gonna kick your ass, but punch you in the shoulder.

[Cuse0323]

What exactly is long overdue and why? You're already killing hundreds of civilians each month over there...why do you need more?

Alright, it's our fault that Assad with the help of Iran, and Russia has created a War in Syria. Trump should have just stayed the hell out. 59 bombs on a fckin airbase, and now it's on him. Obama does nothing, and Assad is fine. Got it.

[Russian Rocket]

Rocket boy getting his shit pushed in and does the ol' divert game.

Your country was responsible for getting rid of Assad's chemical weapons. Turns out, like normal, Putin lied. He has his hands in the cookie jar.

Yeah, the 1st time gas was used it could've been the rebels to create a false flag. Assad is playing on that this time.

Big deal. Trump warned you to pull out. He puts a few holes in some buildings for show. That's like me saying I'm gonna kick your ass, but punch you in the shoulder.

I love when this resident pedophile idiot decides to chime in.
Hey CHUMP let me quickly show everyone how easy it is to make you look like a complete TOOL that you are.

Post a link here, that proves, that Putin lied about chemical weapons.

I'll wait right here.




...oh and don't forget to run and hide now for 2-3 hours like you normally do.

[Russian Rocket]

Alright, it's our fault that Assad with the help of Iran, and Russia has created a War in Syria. Trump should have just stayed the hell out. 59 bombs on a fckin airbase, and now it's on him. Obama does nothing, and Assad is fine. Got it.

Russia is responsible for creating a war in Syria?


HAHAHAHAHA....I mean understand that it's still early for your Curser, but c'mon now

[Cuse0323]

Russia is responsible for creating a war in Syria?


HAHAHAHAHA....I mean understand that it's still early for your Curser, but c'mon now

Unreal, did I say responsible?

[Russian Rocket]

Unreal, did I say responsible?

"Alright, it's our fault that Assad with the help of Iran, and Russia has created a War in Syria." - Cuser

[rkelly110]

I love when this resident pedophile idiot decides to chime in.
Hey CHUMP let me quickly show everyone how easy it is to make you look like a complete TOOL that you are.

Post a link here, that proves, that Putin lied about chemical weapons.

I'll wait right here.




...oh and don't forget to run and hide now for 2-3 hours like you normally do.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/06/postmortems-confirm-syria-chemical-attack-turkey-says

Russia’s defence ministry has argued that Syrian planes were destroying chemical weapons, not deploying them, and said the airstrikes targeted a rebel storage depot for toxins. That claim has been widely dismissed as implausible by experts.

Lying sack of shit. There wasn't suppose to be any weapons. They were turned in and
destroyed in 2014.

[Snowball]

The Russians will only say they don't know where they went, but there are a number

of reports that only 23 tomahawks actually hit the Syrian Air Force base in Homs.

These did not simply veer off target either, as no tomahawk strikes were reported

anywhere else inside Syria. What was found perhaps, is some scraps near Latakia,
a Russian base, that could be parts of tomahawks that were taken out.

Russia obviously doesn't want to admit they took out most of the tomahawks,

preferring to keep that information secret.


https://southfront.org/russian-defen...rget-in-syria/

[Cuse0323]

"Alright, it's our fault that Assad with the help of Iran, and Russia has created a War in Syria." - Cuser

Nice. I can check out from this nonsense now. Thank you for proving my point.

[khicks26]

War opens a Pandora’s box of evils that once unleashed are beyond anyone’s control. The invasion of Afghanistan set out to defeat al-Qaida, and nearly 16 years later, we are embroiled in a losing fight with the Taliban. We believed we could invade Iraq and create a Western-style democracy and weaken Iran’s power in the region. The fragmentation of Iraq among warring factions has left Iran the dominant Muslim nation in the Middle East and Iraq destroyed as a unified nation. We set out to topple President Bashar Assad in Syria but then began to bomb the Islamic insurgents trying to overthrow him. We spread the “war on terror” to Yemen, Libya and Syria in a desperate effort to crush regional resistance. Instead, we created new failed states and lawless enclaves where vacuums were filled by the jihadist forces we sought to defeat. We have wasted a staggering $4.79 trillion on death, destruction and folly as our nation is increasingly impoverished and climate change threatens us with extinction. The arms manufacturers, who have a vested interest in perpetuating these debacles, will work to make a few trillion more before this act of collective imperial suicide comes to a humiliating end.
In war, when you attack one force you implicitly aid another. And the forces we assist by striking the Assad regime are the forces we ironically are determined to eradicate—Nusra Front, al-Qaida and other Islamic radical groups. These are the same Islamic forces we, along with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and Kuwait, largely created, armed and funded at the inception of the civil war in Syria. They are the forces that have responded to the chaos caused by our misguided military interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. They are the forces that execute Western captives, slaughter religious minorities, carry out terrorism in Europe and the United States and collect billions of dollars from smuggling refugees into Europe. They are our sometime enemies and our sometime allies.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/...f_war_20170407

[Russian Rocket]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ck-turkey-says

Russia’s defence ministry has argued that Syrian planes were destroying chemical weapons, not deploying them, and said the airstrikes targeted a rebel storage depot for toxins. That claim has been widely dismissed as implausible by experts.

Lying sack of shit. There wasn't suppose to be any weapons. They were turned in and
destroyed in 2014.

nice try, but I'm still waiting for an actual proof clown!

tell me moron, why is it so easy for almost everyone to make you look like a braindead retard on this board?