-
Comment -
http://www2.dailyfaceoff.com/starting-goalies/ heres a professional fantasy analysis. Which in hockey has a lot of similarities with money line bettingComment -
Pressure pick.
Coach you have made some good NBA plays on your own lately.
I saw a total in a Texas game last night but I hesitated and missed it, still learning.
Pass one more day to Thursday, I see the Pelicans -4 and Indiana B2B. Lets get it!Comment -
JJ where are you at on the Illinois-Chicago bet... get it while its there. You aren't going to get a big ML shot like this in a few weeks. If you miss out on the boat consider yourself a square.
this pick is in no way guaranteed to winComment -
Raptors/Sixers OVER 204.5
Toronto 17-7 on overs
Sixers hot, won 2 in a row. Looks like good spot to put up some points.
Comment -
Well it is tampa. So you know its not easy. Thats why the price is cheap. Easy bets in nhl are usually -220 or higher. But yeah in the abstract i understand what you are saying. Tampa is due for the win. . i blipped the fantasy thread on johnson. Guy talks about johnson and his heat and how to handle this keeper. And thats the way im rolling tonite.Comment -
I am going with Nets -1.5
A lot of good picks here watch most win and Nets loseComment -
Lets go Newguy and Russ.
GL on Nets JJComment -
In a vacuum it may lose but if you bet these same stats (which come along a few times a week) they do generally win enough to make money. You just have to be able to grind. Just like anything - only way to make money at this is truly grind or be very very selective. The latter is really hard for most.Comment -
Here is a further gametime info on calgary.http://www.sportsnet.ca/960/calgary-...algary-flames/Comment -
Thats pat stienberg. He is the writer on the first link. I posted. He blogs for calgary flames and has 20k followers on twitter. He was at calgarys morning skate today. And talks about it on his twitter account. He is a insider to a extent and he is hot on flames tonite. (fantasy)Comment -
Alright I'm convinced but vary skeptical of hockey this year. Oilers are actually goodComment -
UCLA -30 is my best play today.
Also on Okie State -32.5 and MTSU -2 then my system plays of Chicago St/NW u131.5 and SU/BU u138Comment -
I'm sure the oddsmakers have all that info to make the Flames line which essentially opened a pick. If I lose this one I'm not touching hockey until the playoffs. Bishop is a monster and I do not know much about this Johnson character. I will say that the play looks better because Kucherov may or may not play. Speaking on the upcoming NHL playoffs, I still remember Dallas beating Minny in the first round but I believe I see a legit cup contender in Dubs given the right circumstances. Appears they aren't playing too shabby this year either we shall see. MLB an NHL playoffs are excellent.
NCAA has been God Shammgods $$$ so far in the subforum and he is on Tenn-MT. Disastro61200 is fading newguy and that's not a good sign for Belmont backers. Hard to get a read on that market for me this year so taking a shot with newguy and AR for some betpoints. I may need to stick with only the NBA.
Tyreke has been upgraded to questionable yet the line fell on pinny to -3, makes me wonder if the nba sharps think he would actually hurt them tomorrow. JJ made a comment about Conley in Memphis, I still think it's a great spot to get a W for the pelicans.Comment -
I understand but the good teams are winning right now. Lots of streaks. Or 80% or higher. So its just a matter of finding the right play. Totals are good also. Its 30 games into nhl season. And san jose has played 4 overs. Because they have a iron defense. Blackhawks 1 over last 10. Pitt 10 overs in a row. So those totals plays removes the skeptisism. At least currentlyComment -
Comment -
Looking at your card I like the BU/SU total but like I said I'm NOT very good with NCAA. I've seen the threads on UCLA ever since the UK win and they must be a great team.
Astro I hope the streak continues good sir
with UCLA go belmont though!
Comment -
A comparable line from the other day, that I bet hard, was Creighton -35 against Longwood. They won by 51 (told jj to take that too, be passed)
UCLA has a lot of offensive firepower and is solid on defense
They're at home against a bad UC-Santa Barbara squad who has all ready lost to SMU by 27 and USC by 24. UCSB is 0-5 ATS, UCLA is 8-2.
UCLA is shooting 56.2% from the field and 47.1 from 3. UCSB is allowing a pretty high defensive FG% of 45.7 and 34.6 from behind the arc. UCLA also is holding opponents to 40.6 from the field (UCSB only shoots 40.1 from the field anyway). UCSB fouls a decent amount but isn't great at getting to the line.
They are going to be completely outmatched and UCLA will jump to a large lead early (probably 20+ points within the first 10 minutes). UCLA should be up around 30 or so at the break. With their extremely efficient offense the 30 point spread should be easy to cover. By the time they take out their starters they should be up 40-45 and close the game out winning by about the same.
Not to mention UCLA has had some pretty good competition so far so their stats could be better if they'd only faced powderpuff squads. UCSB has faced a couple decent teams and some bad ones, so their stats are better than they'll actually perform against a top team.Comment -
Oh and UCLA's average margin at home is +28.5; 103.8-75.3 is average score in 6 games. All 6 of those games have been against better competition than UCSBComment -
Yea I remember that call on Creighton. I was reading magazines and thinking how crazy that number was yet it still hit.
Comment -
My other plays are because MTSU has been extremely hot and Belmont isn't doing too great this year. Stats wise it's a walk for MTSU, and feels like Belmont is coasting more off their name than anything else. They aren't even making 3's like they usually do. The Blue Raiders are bitch slapping teams. Had them against Vandy in their last game at -2, they won by 23. Being on the road hasn't been an issue either with a 2-0 record (at Ole Miss & S Alabama) with margin of victory being +13.5
Okie State is pretty much the same thinking as UCLA, just Okie State isn't as good. That's my smallest play of the night
The 2 unders are just a byproduct of taking the opposite from what the book seems to want. When both team's average points scored are 12+ points off the total you go the opposite way. So Baylor/SU average 150.3 points scored but their total opened at 137.5. 12.8 points off of their average so seems the books want you to take the over, so go opposite and go under. ChiSt/NW average 143.2 but total opened at 130.5 so going under there too. 3-0 with those so far but only been betting on CBB for a week and a half so far this year.Comment -
Flyers for NHL, Wizards for NBA my only two picks so far tonight. May hit a few moreComment -
PenguinsComment -
for 1k patriots on the moneyline is where to put itComment -
After looking into it more, decided to double my bet on MTSU. Realized that Belmont's 3 latests wins were against some bad competition. At first glance I saw Lipscomb twice and Pepperdine, they're both usually decent. This year not so much though.Comment -
I went with Calgary and UCLA after reading this thread.Comment -
Guys firing away
FukComment -
Australia to beat Pakistan 1st test match starting in 1 hour looks easy money at 4/9 odds, bet it jjComment -
Riser you have been hot as a stoveComment
