If you read this you can't not vote Trump

[brooks85]

betpoints are more valuable

the amount I have compared to you I can see why you'd think that.

[Triple_D_Bet]

because they are, it is called the mainstream media.



and one example would be?


find me one relevant "job" she has had that comes close to Trump's history of job creation and winning a government contract because he knows how to cut costs.

I never claimed she had a job that created jobs or cut costs; I said she was picked for a government job (Secretary of State). Besides, didn't you and I just agree that government doesn't create jobs? Assuming we're correct, than we shouldn't be looking for 'job creation' experience in government officials, as they don't create jobs, right?

I don't doubt Trump knows about managing a budget in the private sector, as i don't doubt Clinton knows about his from her involvement with businesses. What I do doubt is either of them having the willpower or ability to balance the federal budget, considering neither of them has shown any plans to do so and neither of them has any experience doing so with a government budget. Most politicians balance their own personal budget for example, but it obviously doesn't make them any more likely to balance the government budget....Trump appears no different in that regard.

[brooks85]

I never claimed she had a job that created jobs or cut costs; I said she was picked for a government job (Secretary of State). Besides, didn't you and I just agree that government doesn't create jobs? Assuming we're correct, than we shouldn't be looking for 'job creation' experience in government officials, as they don't create jobs, right?

I don't doubt Trump knows about managing a budget in the private sector, as i don't doubt Clinton knows about his from her involvement with businesses. What I do doubt is either of them having the willpower or ability to balance the federal budget, considering neither of them has shown any plans to do so and neither of them has any experience doing so with a government budget. Most politicians balance their own personal budget for example, but it obviously doesn't make them any more likely to balance the government budget....Trump appears no different in that regard.

well, that is odd because that is exactly what we were talking about.


So again, if you don't vote trump you'll be passing on the only candidate to have ANY chance of doing what you say you want. Nothing you say will change that fact.



If gary johson was going to shit out a new oil field it wouldn't make a difference, he isn't going to win. So hope you have fun patting yourself on the back as the global warming scam spreads because you didn't come back to reality and use your vote realistically.



"Hey, I voted johnson, I had nothing to do with this." Wrong, you're just as guilty as the clinton/obama voters.

[Triple_D_Bet]

because they are, it is called the mainstream media.

Again, calling the tax policy reviews meaningless doesn't make them so. From a simple math perspective, how do you expect drastically cutting tax revenues without cutting spending to not grow the debt significantly? That's really, really basic math man...ignoring it because you don't like the messenger doesn't mean you're right, it means you're choosing to remain ignorant.

[Triple_D_Bet]

well, that is odd because that is exactly what we were talking about.


So again, if you don't vote trump you'll be passing on the only candidate to have ANY chance of doing what you say you want. Nothing you say will change that fact.



If gary johson was going to shit out a new oil field it wouldn't make a difference, he isn't going to win. So hope you have fun patting yourself on the back as the global warming scam spreads because you didn't come back to reality and use your vote realistically.



"Hey, I voted johnson, I had nothing to do with this." Wrong

Voting for a candidate who has the experience to do what he says and has a history of balancing budgets, instead of the candidates who have neither, is better than voting for one of the candidates who can't and won't do anything about debt. We'll have to hope that enough people stop blindly following the blind and vote for a good candidate before the country goes irretrievably pear-shaped.

[brooks85]

Again, calling the tax policy reviews meaningless doesn't make them so. From a simple math perspective, how do you expect drastically cutting tax revenues without cutting spending to not grow the debt significantly? That's really, really basic math man...ignoring it because you don't like the messenger doesn't mean you're right, it means you're choosing to remain ignorant.

you're right, exposing their agenda does and I did an excellent job. Thank you.

[brooks85]

Voting for a candidate who has the experience to do what he says and has a history of balancing budgets, instead of the candidates who have neither, is better than voting for one of the candidates who can't and won't do anything about debt. We'll have to hope that enough people stop blindly following the blind and vote for a good candidate before the country goes irretrievably pear-shaped.

you forgot to mention the experience combined with NO CHANCE



again, with the BS.

[Triple_D_Bet]

you're right, exposing their agenda does and I did an excellent job. Thank you.

If MSNBC reports 2+2 =4, it's not false because it's from a source you don't like

This is why I don't usually respond to you: I ask you a very simple question, and you either choose not to answer (most likely because you don't have a good answer) and revert to just claiming you're right without any evidence. What's troubling is that the majority of Americans seem to use that same lack-of-reasoning when it comes to politics

you forgot to mention the experience combined with NO CHANCE



again, with the BS.

He's on enough ballots to be elected, so he has a chance. Is it smaller than Clinton's? Certainly....but Trump's chances are tiny compared to Clinton's too. You and the rest of the sheep can go on voting just trying to be on the 'winning team'; the rest of us will carry the burden of voting in the best candidate.

It looks like we're done here, as our conversation has devolved into you just dodging a simple question as it always seems to. Enjoy your inevitable inane retort, and make sure that 2k is dialed up for November 9th

[MoMoneyMoVaughn]

Trump has zero chance to win this election.

It's actually absurd that anyone things he might.

[brooks85]

If MSNBC reports 2+2 =4, it's not false because it's from a source you don't like

This is why I don't usually respond to you: I ask you a very simple question, and you either choose not to answer (most likely because you don't have a good answer) and revert to just claiming you're right without any evidence. What's troubling is that the majority of Americans seem to use that same lack-of-reasoning when it comes to politics




He's on enough ballots to be elected, so he has a chance. Is it smaller than Clinton's? Certainly....but Trump's chances are tiny compared to Clinton's too. You and the rest of the sheep can go on voting just trying to be on the 'winning team'; the rest of us will carry the burden of voting in the best candidate.

It looks like we're done here, as our conversation has devolved into you just dodging a simple question as it always seems to. Enjoy your inevitable inane retort, and make sure that 2k is dialed up for November 9th

good thing that in no way compares to what happened. You can try grasping at more straws, good luck. If you can find one objective source let me know. The mainstream media isn't a good source.


like I said, you are truly delusional.

[MoMoneyMoVaughn]

good thing that in way compares to what happened. You can try grasping at more straws, good luck.

[brooks85]

was one missing word really that confusing mo?

[Grant65]

Excellent, short piece and yes brutally honest because we dissidents are realistic but driven to take back America:

The "Trump movement" isn't about Donald Trump the person -- who is a crude, aggressive political outsider -- it's about the idea of demanding an end to government corruption and political elitism.

The Trump movement is about ending the Clinton nightmare for America. It's about giving the finger to Washington D.C. and taking back our democracy from a corrupt class of professional criminals who have been in power for far too long.

Voting for Donald Trump isn't a vote for the person, it's a vote for the movement: the idea that real people across America might regain their freedom from tyranny and oppression. It's about stopping the deliberate destruction of America by the Obama / Clinton crime cartel, restoring accountability at the highest levels, and even indicting and imprisoning key members of the criminal Washington elite.





All-out effort to destroy Trump PROVES he's not part of the establishment... NOT an insider... 'Trump' movement has grown way beyond one man's actions or…
NATURALNEWS.COM

Couldn't have said it better my friend! Thank you fellow deplorable

[MoMoneyMoVaughn]

was one missing word really that confusing mo?

I'm still pretty confused as to what your edited post is trying to say.

Whatever.

Back to my cheerios.

[brooks85]

I'm still pretty confused as to what your edited post is trying to say.

Whatever.

Back to my cheerios.

grab a dictionary while you munch

[inZane]

the amount I have compared to you I can see why you'd think that.

Just like Trump I see you don't give a dime to charity either with all of your fancy "medals" you post like a proud lil' peacock...

[Triple_D_Bet]

good thing that in no way compares to what happened. You can try grasping at more straws, good luck. If you can find one objective source let me know. The mainstream media isn't a good source.


like I said, you are truly delusional.

Oh, what the hell, one more link for ya: http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...st-rich-2016-8

The article references one of the ones I linked above and concurs that these tax cuts without spending cuts will blow up the debt. That good enough for ya?

[brooks85]

Oh, what the hell, one more link for ya: http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...st-rich-2016-8

The article references one of the ones I linked above and concurs that these tax cuts without spending cuts will blow up the debt. That good enough for ya?

...


no, not good enough for me... lol


bullshit that is sourcing BS put out by organizations with an agenda doesn't count as relevant in my book. Call me crazy...

And look at the author's history. Pure trash.



like I said, you're making a huge mistake if you don't vote trump and truly want ANY chance of that.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Just like Trump I see you don't give a dime to charity either with all of your fancy "medals" you post like a proud lil' peacock...

1) Where are your badges? But more importantly..

2) Charitable giving isn't done exclusively through SBR, or even preferentially for me...lack of charity badges on here doesn't mean much.

[Triple_D_Bet]

...


no, not good enough for me... lol


bullshit that is sourcing BS put out by organizations with an agenda doesn't count are relevant in my book. Call me crazy...



like I said, you're making a huge mistake if you don't vote trump and truly want ANY chance of that.

Damn, business insider not a good enough source...sorry brooksy, I assumed you considered it a good enough source; after all, you thought it was a good enough source to quote not even 20 minutes ago:

A glimpse of future America with an over bloated government and absolutely no accountability required whatsoever by federal agencies.



http://www.businessinsider.com/mexic...igaion-2016-10

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/politics-economics/3321306-another-example-what-hillarys-agenda-will-lead-america.html

What a crazy world we live in, where organizations pick up an agenda that makes them irrelevant so quickly!

[brooks85]

Just like Trump I see you don't give a dime to charity either with all of your fancy "medals" you post like a proud lil' peacock...

tell SBR to add a clinton foundation option


lol

[brooks85]

Damn, business insider not a good enough source...sorry brooksy, I assumed you considered it a good enough source; after all, you thought it was a good enough source to quote not even 20 minutes ago:

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/politics-economics/3321306-another-example-what-hillarys-agenda-will-lead-america.html

What a crazy world we live in, where organizations pick up an agenda that makes them irrelevant so quickly!

they are called authors you fool and one isn't a political piece but actual facts. Your desperation is very obvious.

[MoMoneyMoVaughn]

grab a dictionary while you munch

You can use Google to find the definition of certain words. Fun Fact.



I wonder what accounts for the decline of the literary use of flaxseed in the 90s

[BigdaddyQH]

People. Read and learn. Trump has NO chance. None. Zero. That is because the people who really run this nation do not want him to screw things up worse than Oblahblah has already done. Hillary is harmless. She can appoint her Supreme Court Justices and go on her marry way, because there is nothing more she will be allowed to do.

None of you have the slightest clue as to who really runs this nation. Do you really think that there would be much of a difference between Thump and Hillarity? If you believe that, you are certifiable. The truth is simply this. The real people in charge will continue to tax you to death, take what they want from you, and then discard you like today's trash. That is because you people are so blatently stupid that you beg for this to be done to you. The power you are limited to is posting your idiotic comments in here. Start learning people. I did. I studied. This is why you peons make next to nothing compared to me, but pay 10 times the taxes that I do, when I pay taxes at all.

Hillary is a diseased ridden cu*t. Trump is an egotistical fool who had to buy every woman he has been with. Neither one is worth a crap, and that is exactly why they won their primaries. The people, who have little brains but will listen to anything, were sold a bill of goods, just like you fools. They bought it, just like you fools. Now they are going to pay for it, one way or another, just like you fools will.

[irish1]

if hillary said "grab em by the penis" then you could bet nobody would care. Typical double standard with women and the media.

No, the double standard is giving Hilliary a pass but hammering Mr. Trump on everything.

[Triple_D_Bet]

they are called author's you fool and one isn't a political piece but actual facts. Your desperation is very obvious.

Ah, I see; when an organization releases something you don't agree with, the whole organization has an agenda; when you agree with it, the author's credibility and/or objective reality becomes relevant separately from the outlet they're reporting through.

Sounds like an overly-complicated way of rationalizing your confirmation bias buddy...but also sounds like there's no getting through that bias. Good luck, and try to be a little more careful next time to avoid trapping yourself

[brooks85]

Ah, I see; when an organization releases something you don't agree with, the whole organization has an agenda; when you agree with it, the author's credibility and/or objective reality becomes relevant separately from the outlet they're reporting through.

Sounds like an overly-complicated way of rationalizing your confirmation bias buddy...but also sounds like there's no getting through that bias. Good luck, and try to be a little more careful next time to avoid trapping yourself

again, they are called authors... authors write stories and that author of yours has a history of garbage. Click his name and look then try to tell me he doesn't have an agenda.


and what I posted was not a political piece. Cut the bs and save your emoticon.

[inZane]

People. Read and learn. Trump has NO chance. None. Zero. That is because the people who really run this nation do not want him to screw things up worse than Oblahblah has already done. Hillary is harmless. She can appoint her Supreme Court Justices and go on her marry way, because there is nothing more she will be allowed to do.

None of you have the slightest clue as to who really runs this nation. Do you really think that there would be much of a difference between Thump and Hillarity? If you believe that, you are certifiable. The truth is simply this. The real people in charge will continue to tax you to death, take what they want from you, and then discard you like today's trash. That is because you people are so blatently stupid that you beg for this to be done to you. The power you are limited to is posting your idiotic comments in here. Start learning people. I did. I studied. This is why you peons make next to nothing compared to me, but pay 10 times the taxes that I do, when I pay taxes at all.

Hillary is a diseased ridden cu*t. Trump is an egotistical fool who had to buy every woman he has been with. Neither one is worth a crap, and that is exactly why they won their primaries. The people, who have little brains but will listen to anything, were sold a bill of goods, just like you fools. They bought it, just like you fools. Now they are going to pay for it, one way or another, just like you fools will.

So where roughly do YOU live all rich and knowing one?

I agree that the differences between the 2 parties is small and that there are forces that control them.But if she can get her SCOTUS choices appointed, that's a win for the things I care about.

[Triple_D_Bet]

again, they are called authors... authors write stories and that author of yours has a history of garbage. Click his name and look then try to tell me he doesn't have an agenda.


and what I posted was not a political piece. Cut the bs and save your emoticon.

Sounds like pretty obvious confirmation bias to me buddy, and none of it changes the original facts: that Trump isn't going to act any differently than a typical politician because he does business the same way they do.

Nor is Mr. Trump outside of, or even slightly opposed to, Washington business as usual. It’s how he does business. Americans are angry at Beltway back-scratching, logrolling and backroom agreements. This is the art of the deal. In explaining his $100,000 contribution to the Clinton Foundation, Mr. Trump bragged: “When they call, I give. And you know what, when I need something from them . . . I call them. They are there for me.”

http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-is-the-ultimate-insider-1456447752

[brooks85]

Sounds like pretty obvious confirmation bias to me buddy, and none of it changes the original facts: that Trump isn't going to act any differently than a typical politician because he does business the same way they do.



http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-is...der-1456447752

then you're showing off that delusion of yours that has you thinking johnson has any chance. Again, you posted a bs political piece by a hack, I posted something that is a fact about Mexico and extrapolated what big government gives you. Cut the bs.



Speaking of delusions, how long do you want to spend paying me back because I'll give you any odds you want for Johnson to win but you have to risk at least 1k betpoints? Man up for shut up.

[Triple_D_Bet]

then you're showing off that delusion of yours that has you thinking johnson has any chance. Again, you posted a bs political piece by a hack, I posted something that is a fact about Mexico and extrapolated what big government gives you. Cut the bs.



Speaking of delusions, how long do you want to spend paying me back because I'll give you any odds you want for Johnson to win? Man up for shut up.

Are you denying that Trump said that? The Wall Street journal isn't always right in politics or otherwise, but they got this one right i think.

If I thought Johnson was likely to win, I'd have bet on him. Since I don't and didn't claim it, I didn't bet on him. However, a vote for him at least sends a message that I won't blindly vote for bad candidates, and has some worth...far more than voting for one form of bad or the other.

[rkelly110]

So where roughly do YOU live all rich and knowing one?

I agree that the differences between the 2 parties is small and that there are forces that control them.But if she can get her SCOTUS choices appointed, that's a win for the things I care about.

Calif.

[brooks85]

Are you denying that Trump said that? The Wall Street journal isn't always right in politics or otherwise, but they got this one right i think.

If I thought Johnson was likely to win, I'd have bet on him. Since I don't and didn't claim it, I didn't bet on him. However, a vote for him at least sends a message that I won't blindly vote for bad candidates, and has some worth...far more than voting for one form of bad or the other.

do you always just change the subject? Don't do that. Liberals do that.





How could I deny he said something when we were not even talking about quotes or the WSJ?










You go ahead and vote Johnson, not my guilt it is yours. If hillary wins like always everything I've said will come true, not bragging just being honest when it comes to my game theory(see the fools in 2008 and 2012 who were JUST LIKE YOU when obama was running, who was right in the end?) and you can take all the blame for not doing your part to stop it.

[pavyracer]

Double use of negative..a typical uneducated Trump voter.

[brooks85]

Double use of negative..a typical uneducated Trump voter.

says the moron who didn't think mccain could be president because he crashed 4 jets. Typical liberal and that was 8 years ago. That is the kind of stupid you're too late to fix.

Also, since you have a nice long history of lying on this forum, am I mistaken that you have lied about being an engineer? You used to lie a lot but obviously you learned your lesson after being caught many times and it wasn't by me.