Are You Fu#$#$#$ Kidding Me UCLA Lost By More Than 3?

tony_come · 09-25-16, 04:56 AM

Glad to hear you made it home safely

TheMoneyShot · 09-25-16, 04:56 AM

I go to take a piss in the john.... come out.... and see Shaw giving the typical postgame interview.

They didn't show the final score.....

I said oh well... I'm hammered....

At least I got a push!!!

But no fuskedngfaklsfskldfn'klf wayasklodgnsko'dads'asasgfd misfdjndjwmng

TheMoneyShot · 09-25-16, 04:59 AM

Mora is such a beady eyed PRICK!!!!!!!

Sam Odom · 09-25-16, 07:10 AM

Full slate today... plenty of winners to get your $$$ back

GL

seaborneq · 09-25-16, 07:13 AM

ABC didn't want to dwell on it even though someone in the booth said someone in the desert is happy. They replayed it the first time nearly ten minutes after the game was over.

thetrinity · 09-25-16, 07:15 AM

Definitely a tough loss. If u had 3.5 on bovada it would have been worse

DOM_Toretto · 09-25-16, 07:32 AM

Woooooooo Mccaffery backers rejoice

jjgold · 09-25-16, 07:43 AM

you win some and lose some that way

ByeShea · 09-25-16, 07:44 AM

Originally posted by seaborneq

ABC didn't want to dwell on it even though someone in the booth said someone in the desert is happy.

That gave me a chuckle.

On final play Stanford pass rusher did something very interesting - he purposely ran himself by the pocket, so much so that Rosen became unaware of him (ran himself off tv screen), then he had time to rush from behind bc Rosen was looking to throw ball 70 yds through the air - so he crushed QB ball came loose and DL returned for TD unchallenged.

I also think Stanford won despite an idiotic decision to punt and poor time out mgmt. Hard to believe UCLA didn't win that game outright.

Sam Odom · 09-25-16, 07:50 AM

Originally posted by ByeShea

Hard to believe UCLA didn't win that game outright.

Jesus wanted McCaffrey to win

yahoonino · 09-25-16, 07:53 AM

ucla play calling was really bad,,,

rm18 · 09-25-16, 08:04 AM

Another reason this happened was time keeper screwed UCLA, there is no penetrating way the first two snaps took 16 seconds combined, so their should of been more than 4 seconds left and they would of had a chance at a field goal and not just an end zone heave.

unde0087 · 09-25-16, 08:58 AM

TheMoneyShot · 09-25-16, 11:32 AM

How many straight favorites have covered now on ABC Primetime Saturday Night? I think they are 3-0.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong. What is going on here??? For real.

Ghenghis Kahn · 09-25-16, 11:39 AM

money why did you have to remind me? had ml and +3.5. from winning $450 to losing $440 in matter of minutes.

when stanford scored that td, i was pissed i was gonna break even. then that fat fukk ran that shit in for a td.

Sam Odom · 09-25-16, 11:42 AM

Kahn , some say it is better to NOT watch $$$ games

Sammy believes there is truth in that unless small money

Ghenghis Kahn · 09-25-16, 11:45 AM

Originally posted by Sam Odom

Kahn , some say it is better to NOT watch $$$ games

Sammy believes there is truth in that unless small money

i hear you but it's the way i lost. only happens in college football. you never see shit like that in the pros.

game is already over, why run that back for a td?

rm18 · 09-25-16, 11:47 AM

Originally posted by Ghenghis Kahn

i hear you but it's the way i lost. only happens in college football. you never see shit like that in the pros.

game is already over, why run that back for a td?

I lost Colts +6.5 on that shit. That one was even dumber because they could of took a knee, and by running it back they gave Luck a chance for a TD+ onside.

LT Profits · 09-25-16, 11:51 AM

I was fortunate enough to get Stanford -2.5 yesterday so it didn't matter to me, but for those that has +/-3 or +/-3.5...YOWZA!

Microbetter · 09-25-16, 03:41 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

I was fortunate enough to get Stanford -2.5 yesterday so it didn't matter to me, but for those that has +/-3 or +/-3.5...YOWZA!

Yea, I had Stanford -3. Thought push, then bingo. I won 2 games this weekend with last minute plays.

Inspirited · 09-25-16, 04:54 PM

think i benefited from this, but bama didn't feel the need to score 10 points in the second half for my over

Underdog5229 · 09-25-16, 04:54 PM

I'm sure many got fukked on the last play. luckily I was on stanford

BigdaddyQH · 09-25-16, 05:30 PM

You guys lose on a daily basis. Why the big surprise. Bottom line. Stanford was 8-0 S/U and 7-1 ATS in their last 8 meetings against Uceless.. Uceless was 0-2-1 ATS this season.

Ghenghis Kahn · 09-25-16, 05:43 PM

Originally posted by BigdaddyQH

You guys lose on a daily basis. Why the big surprise. Bottom line. Stanford was 8-0 S/U and 7-1 ATS in their last 8 meetings against Uceless.. Uceless was 0-2-1 ATS this season.

lol this fukking clown again...

Ghenghis Kahn · 09-25-16, 05:45 PM

got back what i lost from ucla game...

3 Team Parlay #xxxxxxxxxxx

Football - NFL - Point Spread
San Francisco 49ers @ Seattle Seahawks
Seattle Seahawks -10.0 (-105) Sep 25, 2016 1:05 PM

Football - NFL - Point Spread
Los Angeles Rams @ Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Los Angeles Rams 4.5 (-120) Sep 25, 2016 1:05 PM

Football - NFL - Point Spread
Pittsburgh Steelers @ Philadelphia Eagles
Philadelphia Eagles 4.5 (-115) Sep 25, 2016 1:25 PM

$125.00
$711.48

trytrytry · 09-25-16, 06:43 PM

stanford almost missed the game winning PAT (the TD before the fumble) is what I was thinking whew close on if you had +2.5 or -2.5

QuantumLeap · 09-25-16, 06:51 PM

Originally posted by seaborneq

ABC didn't want to dwell on it even though someone in the booth said someone in the desert is happy. They replayed it the first time nearly ten minutes after the game was over.

I believe thet's a Brent Musburger quote.

TheMoneyShot · 09-25-16, 06:57 PM

Originally posted by Ghenghis Kahn

lol this fukking clown again...

Exactly.

The fuk is he talking about? Guy probably lives in a cardboard box.

Originally posted by trytrytry

stanford almost missed the game winning PAT (the TD before the fumble) is what I was thinking whew close on if you had +2.5 or -2.5

After they scored Try.... bartender looks at me and says... they might miss the PAT... you never know man. I was wasted... and I told him.. you're right... you never know. That damn kicker kicked that ball so inaccurate but with a TON OF HEAT on it... and just snuck it in. Bartender's reaction was so funny... he's like "DID THEY MISS IT!! DID THEY MISS IT!" Even drunk I could tell he made it... I'm like nope... he got it.

big joe 1212 · 09-25-16, 06:57 PM

I got fukked on UCLA and then got fukked on California. AZ St. runs back an on side kick for a TD to cover the spread.

i70/i25 kid · 09-26-16, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by Ghenghis Kahn

i hear you but it's the way i lost. only happens in college football. you never see shit like that in the pros.

game is already over, why run that back for a td?

Why not?

rm18 · 09-26-16, 10:18 PM

Originally posted by QuantumLeap

I believe thet's a Brent Musburger quote.

Musberger was not calling the game. Not sure who it was.

DrunkHorseplayer · 09-26-16, 11:25 PM

I had Stanford -3; best beat of my life and about time I got one.

Iwinyourmoney · 09-27-16, 01:46 AM

How did the Peoria sharps know?

arrgy · 09-27-16, 04:31 AM

Is that worse than what Iowa did to Rutgers at the end of the first half? Thank God I was on the other side and pushed. Iowa -7 for the first half. 0-0 (unbelievably) with 2 minutes left. Rutgers breaks off a great run gets down to the 1 of Iowa. A chip shot FG by Rutgers will lose the bet. Rutgers runs the ball four times and gets nothing!
Ok, Iowa on their 2 with 60 seconds left. Rutgers has shut down Iowa the entire game. Iowa marches all the way down the field, again a chip shot FG will lose the bet. No, they somehow manage to score with :10 on the clock. Iowa 7, Rutgers 0.
At least UCLA was trying to score, and you were hoping for no pick 6. Instead, you got a fumble 6 that happens a lot on a team trying to come back. But what Rutgers did that was horrific.