You would be -62 Units if you bet Warriors ML every game this season

[blackHIPPY]

+73 u
-
5.5 u (-550 12/12 @ Bucks)
1.65 u (-165 12/30 @ Mavs)
6 u (-600 1/13 @ Nugs)
2.8 u (-280 1/16 @ Pistons)
3.65 u (-365 1/19 @ Blazers)
65 u (-6500 3/6 @ Lakers)
1 u (+155 3/19 @ Spurs)
9.5 u (-950 4/1 vs. Celtics)
40 u (-4000 4/5 vs. Twolves)

-62.1 Units

I was bout to ask then realized it wouldnt be too ardous to do myself
Wow gambling is hard

[MickeyMan]

Well they were dogs for at least two wins that I remember so that wouldn't be exact but close...at spurs last week and at rockets earlier this year are two for sure.

[Kermit]

How about if you bet all of their overs?

[jjgold]

That is some stat

[MickeyMan]

Well they were dogs for at least two wins that I remember so that wouldn't be exact but close...at spurs last week and at rockets earlier this year are two for sure.

Also won as a dog at cavs

[Git Lo]

thats some perspective!

[Git Lo]

NBA has to be the hardest sport to cap. I cant imagine any other sport being this difficult.... Stats won't save you and there are so many inconsistent teams, especially this year, i know for a fact this season was unforgivable to a lot of people.

[rm18]

dog 4 times but basically 60

[Jaak Varblane]

Stats won't save you

Exactly. And that's the best part of capping NBA.

[DOM-Ganador]

I wonder if you just bet the MLs on teams above .500?
Home games only?
Nothing over -1000??

[goduke]

dogs more times if you paid attention to their games with live betting

[Seto]

A lot of that is because of the -6500 though. No one in their right mind would bet 6500 to win 100 right? I guess maybe there are some people out there who would.

[pavyracer]

Wait a second here. In the losses when they were -1000 or -1500 you lost 10 or 15 units..not 1.

[yisman]

Wait a second here. In the losses when they were -1000 or -1500 you lost 10 or 15 units..not 1.

Try reading the first post. That's why he said you'd be down 62 units.

It's not correct, though, as they did win a few times as underdogs.

Another thing is when you're talking about these huge chalk MLs, the book you use is important. Some books like to inflate the chalk MLs to a ridiculous degree (like Bovada).

[jjgold]

It's why Moneyline dog players are more successful

[stevek173]

Someone give us the correct #.

[CanuckG]

Would you not be up if you bet GSW ATS each game this season?

[MickeyMan]

Wait a second here. In the losses when they were -1000 or -1500 you lost 10 or 15 units..not 1.

You are definitely the dumbest poster on sbr.

Congrats.

[CJ]

Very misleading as 105 units are off LA and Minny, games you'd have to be insane to ML bet.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

Would you not be up if you bet GSW ATS each game this season?

They were 43-36-3 ATS according to VI.

[thetrinity]

curious what this looks like if you do 10-1 or less mls only, for the wins too.

[TheMoneyShot]

You can mind fuk this all you want.

Should of never lost to Boston at Home... or Minnesota at Home.

[pavyracer]

You can mind fuk this all you want.

Should of never lost to Boston at Home... or Minnesota at Home.

With the same reasoning they shouldn't have beaten Memphis in Memphis. They were -3000 or something like this and needed refs help to win at end.

They got lucky in some of the 73 wins.

[TheMoneyShot]

With the same reasoning they shouldn't have beaten Memphis in Memphis. They were -3000 or something like this and needed refs help to win at end.

They got lucky in some of the 73 wins.

Didn't get a chance to watch that game. It was probably rig city.

[Git Lo]

Not a mind penetrate you just cant win every game. 73-9 record wont be broken

[habitualwinning]

Would you not be up if you bet GSW ATS each game this season?

Up for sure, but only a couple units. Best team in history and barely turning profits for gamblers.

They were 43-36-3 ATS according to VI.

I have them at 45-35-2, up 6 units and loose change. I guess it depends on what numbers the tracking system uses. A point or a hook here or there changes a couple of wins/losses/pushes on the spread. Using the VI figures they ended up 3 units and loose change, which is ironic and almost comical when you look at the big picture of everything. GS covered their first 4 games of the season, thus up 4 units right off the bat. A guy could've just bet them their first 4 games of the season, then quit and ended up with more profit than a guy who bet them the entire season and sat through every game and the grind that all that entails. Maybe the old saying, "Hit it and quit it" could sum up the Warriors season from a betting perspective, lol. I'm too burnt out right now to look it up but I believe that the Spurs fared better this season ATS, churning more profit than GS did.

[TheMoneyShot]

Not a mind penetrate you just cant win every game. 73-9 record wont be broken

They might go 74-8 next year.

[LVHerbie]

A lot of that is because of the -6500 though. No one in their right mind would bet 6500 to win 100 right? I guess maybe there are some people out there who would.

Probably killed off a few suckers' 25 team parlays...