So...does mike tomlin get fired at halftime?

[DOM-Ganador]

Sir, please! that is the definition of coaching. DB should be coached to know to defend toward sideline, safety playing middle, elementary stuff dude.

OK.The professional football player has no responsibility to do his job....bad coaching....not on that play...SIR.

[recon1]

You don't think every player has been coached on the proper way to play their positions? Jeezus, players still gotta play. They're not all Hall of Famers for fuks sake.

Obviously not coached well enough OBVIOUSLY. How about that slant for 80+ yards Tebow threw in playoffs few years ago in OT? seeing a trend Einstein?

[DOM-Ganador]

Obviously not coached well enough OBVIOUSLY. How about that slant for 80+ yards Tebow threw in playoffs few years ago in OT? seeing a trend Einstein?

Man you are so right.The Pitt D has been SHEIT for years. I defer to you knowledge and expertise.

[jtoler]

Lol.

[jjgold]

Giant you're mad because you lost big money don't take it out on posters here thank you

[recon1]

Man you are so right.The Pitt D has been SHEIT for years. I defer to you knowledge and expertise.

Your just not comprehending. Defense is solid and so has been offense, it's the coaching that is the problem. What do i know right?

[The Giant]

Giant you're mad because you lost big money don't take it out on posters here thank you

Was that infraction necessary??????

I thought you could only moderate the NHL forum. Do you have global powers now???

[TheSchafe]

Giant you're mad because you lost big money don't take it out on posters here thank you

[Isaiah]

Tomlin is pure garbage. The Steelers have fired just about every coordinator they've had, but the cancer is Tomlin and needs to be cut out. Tomlin is probably a good coordinator, but damn obvious he's over his head as coach. This is a stout team going down the drain. Tomlin is like Norv Turner better as a coordinator.

He is a text book example of the "Peter Principle".

The Peter principle is a concept in management theory formulated by Laurence J. Peter.

In an organizational structure, assessing an employee's potential for a promotion is often based on their performance in the current job. This eventually results in their being promoted to their highest level of competence and potentially then to a role in which they are not competent, referred to as their "level of incompetence". The employee has no chance of further promotion, thus reaching their career's ceiling in an organization.

Peter suggests that "In time, every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out its duties"^[2] and [the corollary] that "work is accomplished by those employees who have not yet reached their level of incompetence." He coined the term hierarchiology as the social science concerned with the basic principles of hierarchically organized systems in the human society.

He noted that their incompetence may be because the required skills are different, but not more difficult. For example, an excellent engineer may be a poor manager because they might not have the interpersonal skills necessary to lead a team.

Rather than seeking to promote a talented "super-competent" junior employee, Peter suggested that an incompetent manager may set them up to fail or dismiss them because they are likely to "violate the first commandment of hierarchical life with incompetent leadership: [namely that] the hierarchy must be preserved". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle

[swordsandtequila]

Obviously not coached well enough OBVIOUSLY. How about that slant for 80+ yards Tebow threw in playoffs few years ago in OT? seeing a trend Einstein?

Yeah, their DB's aren't all world. Numbnuts. By your reasoning, Pete Carroll should have been fired because Seattle's D coughed up 4th quarter leads (and lost) in a number of games. You know, the "legion of boom" that was so dominant? Same players, must have been bad coaching. Oh wait, my bad, he's white.