Long term profits.

[BitCoinTalk]

For all of you here, I'm sure you're just rolling to the bank laughing with all of your winning monies.

For me, I can't tell who is going to win. So I've been using services like CRUSHER and Doc Sports Investors. These services are a heavy chase, and if you loose the 4 in a row, you loose 25+ units because they love to pick the fav's with heavy juice.

I figure if I can take these two serives i just mentioned, turn them into a long term profit with these two serives using one algorithm, I can make long term profits on any of these cheap services.

I belive i might be on the right track so here it is:

Focus on not the winning bets, but instead, focus on not loosing as much.

The point here is not to focus on the wins, but to focus just on not loosing as much, haha. If I could just loose less, I'll be making long term profits.

I have built some software running an algorithm to take me into the long term profits. Using 5 years of data and using my own money to make profit for the last 9 months I think I might finally have it..

The reason I post here, is to get people to stop thinking about the big win, but focus on loosing less money. I'll post how many units I play on each pick of CRUSHER in the services thread so you can see it in action.

Thanks, and GL!

[Slanina]

This sounds serious. All joking aside, good luck, sir.

[TheMoneyShot]

After I read the OP's post... I had to debate if I was intoxicated, dreaming, or just simple impaired in someway.

What the hell did he just say?

[shaunovery]

So the jist is win less money ?

[BitCoinTalk]

I had to debate if I was intoxicated, dreaming, or just simple impaired in someway.

HAHAHAHA It's a mind shift for sure...

So the jist is win less money ?

The jist is chase, labby systems don't work, so let's focus on loosing less... Not really focusing on increasing the win's, but instead, focusing on betting less or none on the more risky picks by these services.

[gauchojake]

How are you going to write an algorithm when you can't even spell lose?

[rpesi9955]

I guess it all makes sense but losing less would also mean winning less right. Isn't this what we're all trying to do every day."win and not lose". Would this translate to betting heavy favorites.......? It sounds simple and has a good ring to it but if it was easy everybody would be doing it.

[BitCoinTalk]

I guess it all makes sense but losing less would also mean winning less right. Isn't this what we're all trying to do every day."win and not lose". Would this translate to betting heavy favorites.......? It sounds simple and has a good ring to it but if it was easy everybody would be doing it.

Just using services like CRUSHER and Doc Sports Investors that are quire affordable and give daily picks.. But yeah man, It wasn't very easy to come up with it, it took a lot of work and months of testing and gathering 5 years of data wasn't an easy task.

I'm just thinking this is just good solid long term profits.

[jjgold]

Is the kid promoting touts

I do not get it what's your angle

[frogsrangers]

penetrate TOUTS

They are all scammers.

RJ Bell and his crew are the worst of the worst. Pisses me off that he has a radio show and the media gives that slime credibility.

[meader99]

We already have a LT profits here.

[boeing power]

"Focus on not loosing so much"


This guy might just be the genius we've all been waiting for.

[teaserpleaser]

We already have a LT profits here.

Kind of surprising right LT seems like a nice guy as far as we know ....99.8 % of touts seem to be east coast shady con artist types. Sorry LT if you see this for the record I don't think he's been a tout for years.

[BitCoinTalk]

Is the kid promoting touts

I do not get it what's your angle

No, I am just using that as an example.. these touts are posted in the services area, so its next to free, no need to promote them.

I'm just saying, I think I found a way to turn thoes slime bucket loosers into a profit.

[jjgold]

Coins keep us updated on this experiment

[BitCoinTalk]

Coins keep us updated on this experiment

Sure, I post them in the service area before games start. Today is +6 units

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/service-plays/3154381-crusher-10-6-a.html#post24604575

[gauchojake]

Sure, I post them in the service area before games start. Today is +6 units

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...l#post24604575

good place for tout plays

[Ralphie Halves]

The jist is chase, labby systems don't work, so let's focus on loosing less... Not really focusing on increasing the win's, but instead, focusing on betting less or none on the more risky picks by these services.

Trying not to lose is pretty much the heart of Labby. Somebody else who wants to say it doesn't work, but can't prove how.

If you are going to be a tout someday, avoid using the word "algorithm". It's an easy cop-out since most people don't know what it is, and you can make the whole process seem more complex than it actually is. Then when you lose a bunch, you say you're going to "tweak the algorithm", yadda yadda. Problem is, people have gotten hip to this. Come up with something else.

[vitalLink]

Thanks for advice

[thestinger]

Hey Bitcoin can you message me or send me an email. I would like to share some info thanks!

[jjgold]

Lol

Funny thread

[gauchojake]

Move this to the promotional links forum

[livingfree]

This is why nobody likes to post cause of all the backlash. GoodLuck Bitcoin with your experiment.

[AnonyMoose]

So, your "algorithm" is to bet either crusher's or doc's play for that day? Or it will tell you which combination of plays from the two services? Do you care to explain a bit more in detail?

[BitCoinTalk]

So, your "algorithm" is to bet either crusher's or doc's play for that day? Or it will tell you which combination of plays from the two services? Do you care to explain a bit more in detail?

It will tell you how many units to play for each pick. It doesn't matter if you use crusher, or just doc, or whatever other service you are following.

[AnonyMoose]

Ah ok. Well the big variable here would be which service you are following. It doesn't matter how good your algorithm is if that particular service loses majority of their plays (unless of course the algorithm is smart enough to tell you to bet 0 units on that crummy service>>then I suppose you would be losing less!)

[BitCoinTalk]

Ah ok. Well the big variable here would be which service you are following. It doesn't matter how good your algorithm is if that particular service loses majority of their plays (unless of course the algorithm is smart enough to tell you to bet 0 units on that crummy service>>then I suppose you would be losing less!)

Yup, you got it. If it's detecting a crummy service, you will definitely lose less.