Lol at Nash commenting on rodgers game 300 yds a nd a TD. How'd stafford look versus chicago??? Maybe worst D in league.
Anyone taking lions giving books $$$
Anyone taking lions giving books $$$
-
Comment -
Steve Nash knows....Better off buying cheese than betting on packers this game.
Lions win 24-13Comment -
Not touching this game, well maybe I will eventually. At this point I dont trust the Detroit secondary one bit and that front isn't going to be as effective with Rodgers' mobility, his calf is fine bogus injury report. Packers played possum last game against Detroit. Smart football, they know exactly how Detroit is going to try to play them and Rodgers too sharp for too fade IMO.Comment -
I'm amazed the Lions are were they are? They have struggled offensively and Stafford is shaky and mistake prone. LINE IS SPOT ON -7.5 and people are going to think Detroit looks good with points. But GB and Rogers at home, 7.5 is no big deal as this offense should put up at least 30 and Detroit lucky to hit 20 on the road. Plus as history shows dome teams struggle in cold weather late in the year and Detroit struggles in GB. GB primed for Super Bowl and are the play!!Comment -
i don't know guys... first of all i am a very experienced tennis gambler and know nothing about NFL (don't laugh but i am not sure i even know every rule of the game)
anyway, in tennis i never ever see a -330 line that is a lock but here almost everyone say Detroit got no chance? if that is the case the ML looks too good to be true (in tennis a lock can usually be around -600 or -700... i often see -1000 lines that are not safe at all by the way)Comment -
Tipsa I think GB moneyline is a lockComment -
Nasher is a great fade, GB is a no-brainer
Comment -
Gl nashComment -
GB ML is tough to beat, considering that Detroit has not won a game in Green Bay since 1991.Comment -
never understood why so many get so excited over the hook sometimes.Comment -
It's either packers or no bet. The Lions are the epitome of a one and done team, with an overrated linebacker/secondary and a defensive front that carries that brand. Offensively, they are incredibly inconsistent and stafford makes terrible decisions.
BUT, I think the packer defense still is weak and they've only looked good because they recently played the bucs and bills offenses. That falcons game is more representative of what they are.
Does Detroit have the consistent offense to make them pay though? Don't think so and Rodgers will definitely put up points against that defensive unit.Comment -
History repeats itself.Comment -
Green Bay wins this easily...They are still fighting for home field advantage and don't think for one second that doesn't mean something...Nobody in the NFC is going to Seattle and beating the Seahawks...I think we can all agree on that...and the Packers just played back to back road games, not an easy task even for pro teams...and they have been invincible at home winning by an average of 30+ points a game...and remember Detroit is still a dome team that doesn't play well outdoors in frigid temperatures and/or inclement weather and this Sunday it's supposed to be 15 degrees!...Yes, I checked the weather channel already!...
....I see Green Bay winning 31 - 14....
Comment -
Nasher never fails
Comment -
Green Bay was the better team today, still don't love that defense, any high octane offense could knock them out of the tournament. But yes, Green Bay covered.
For my haters, I never proclaimed lock of the year, I thought Detroit would give them a little better game, gave my reasons as to why, bet went south, show me a 100 percent 'capper?
Like this guy for instance.,
Here's a guy who is a 20-39-1 'capper, thinks he's the second coming of Jimmy the Greek Snyder, has a penchant for trolling threads, and has in the past been laughed off a several other message boards.
Could be just me, but if one is a 34 percent handicapper, one should stay in one own's lane, if you are hitting at a 34 percent rate, you haeve no business invading a 54 percent NFL handicappers thread.
But like I said, could be just me.
Good job if you were on the Pack.
Best of luck going forward, this doesn't really hurt my bankroll much.Comment -
Green Bay was the better team today, still don't love that defense, any high octane offense could knock them out of the tournament. But yes, Green Bay covered.
For my haters, I never proclaimed lock of the year, I thought Detroit would give them a little better game, gave my reasons as to why, bet went south, show me a 100 percent 'capper?
Like this guy for instance.,
Here's a guy who is a 20-39-1 'capper, thinks he's the second coming of Jimmy the Greek Snyder, has a penchant for trolling threads, and has in the past been laughed off a several other message boards.
Could be just me, but if one is a 34 percent handicapper, one should stay in one own's lane, if you are hitting at a 34 percent rate, you haeve no business invading a 54 percent NFL handicappers thread.
But like I said, could be just me.
Good job if you were on the Pack.
Best of luck going forward, this doesn't really hurt my bankroll much.
Comment -
^
What happened here bud?
Couldn't stand a little ribbing?
Comment -
^
That's pretty much what you are.
A laughing stock.
I'll let you have the last word, good night, hope your luck turns around, it has too, even a gropus monkey can pick better than 20-39-1.
Pleasant evening, take the last word, all yours.Comment -
Wish you posted more often, made a living off of you.Comment -
No reason to even bother with that lowlife. Every single one of his threads have been an absolute disaster. NBA, NFL, MLB, NCAAB, NCAABF.... he must not bet hockey otherwise I'm sure we'd be able to add that one to the list.
On top of that, he's an idiot. You ever read his posts? Guy has the IQ of a fukkin rock.Comment -
LOLComment
