The Green Bay Packers will win Super Bowl 49

[t-wizzle]

On the fast track to the #1 overall seed.

How's those prop bets lookin?

[Vinnie Paz]

Bro this team bumps into the hawks they are done. Road or home

[unitedlad]

Let's Go Pack!

[t-wizzle]

Bro this team bumps into the hawks they are done. Road or home

Wanna bet Vin? Seahawks have no shot of beating this team at Lambeau.

I said it in August and I'll say it again. This is Green Bay's year. Rodgers gets #2 and we restart the discussion of how many rings this guy will get.

[slacker00]

Wanna bet Vin? Seahawks have no shot of beating this team at Lambeau.

I said it in August and I'll say it again. This is Green Bay's year. Rodgers gets #2 and we restart the discussion of how many rings this guy will get.

GB going nowhere with that defense. GB might splash around, but will get sunk when they hit a real defense.

[t-wizzle]

GB going nowhere with that defense. GB might splash around, but will get sunk when they hit a real defense.

Except they just held the top scoring team in the league to 21. Packers D is good.

[slacker00]

Except they just held the top scoring team in the league to 21. Packers D is good.

What game were you watching? You must've been watching a rewind on NFL network.

[t-wizzle]

What game were you watching? You must've been watching a rewind on NFL network.

The Patriots game. They held them to 21. Pay attention.

[slacker00]

The Patriots game. They held them to 21. Pay attention.

It was ATL@GB last night. You must've missed it. GB D got gutted.

[t-wizzle]

It was ATL@GB last night. You must've missed it. GB D got gutted.

In garbage time. Who cares.

[slacker00]

In garbage time. Who cares.

GB could easily have lost if Julio didn't miss the 4Q or any other odd bounce. But you didn't watch, so you don't know.

[t-wizzle]

GB could easily have lost if Julio didn't miss the 4Q or any other odd bounce. But you didn't watch, so you don't know.

No I watched. If you thought Atlanta was winning then you're completely out of touch.

[slacker00]

No I watched. If you thought Atlanta was winning then you're completely out of touch.

ATL scored on every 2H drive. All I'm saying is that if GB hits a real D or Rodgers is slightly off, GB loses.

[lakerboy]

Slacker is the guy who defends cutler. Enough said.

[slacker00]

Slacker is the guy who defends cutler. Enough said.

Cutler sucks. I'm done defending that guy. Where you been, lakerboy?

[meader99]

ATL scored on every 2H drive. All I'm saying is that if GB hits a real D or Rodgers is slightly off, GB loses.

So Julio missing part of the 4th quarter didn't matter then.... GB faced a good D in NE and Rodgers was slightly off, both in the same game, yet won.

[cala56]

lol30 points by falcons in 2 half.

[slacker00]

So Julio missing part of the 4th quarter didn't matter then.... GB faced a good D in NE and Rodgers was slightly off, both in the same game, yet won.

Rodgers was off? Please explain.

[Hot Jerry]

SEATTLE - is untouchable !! There second SB is coming !! All they have to do is pick up there trophy !!

[meader99]

Rodgers was off? Please explain.

He missed some throws early on and they kicked 4 redzone field goals.

[lakerboy]

I took atl. I knew gb would have an off day. That game meant nothing. Gb haters.

[slacker00]

He missed some throws early on and they kicked 4 redzone field goals.

You'll have to be more specific.

[meader99]

You'll have to be more specific.

Read 121 then.

[slacker00]

Read 121 then.

You said Rodgers was off, I asked for a play and you said a FG drive. Many of those were to Adams, but they haven't really had a great chemistry all year, not really anyone's fault, he's a rookie and that's expected. I know one of those was to Jordy, but it was good coverage and Jordy couldn't hang on, think there was one like that with Cobb too. I just can't find good evidence that Rodgers was "off". I guess you are conceding the point...

[meader99]

You said Rodgers was off, I asked for a play and you said a FG drive. Many of those were to Adams, but they haven't really had a great chemistry all year, not really anyone's fault, he's a rookie and that's expected. I know one of those was to Jordy, but it was good coverage and Jordy couldn't hang on, think there was one like that with Cobb too. I just can't find good evidence that Rodgers was "off". I guess you are conceding the point...

I think Rodgers missed some throws early in that game, perhaps to being a little hyped for the matchup. If you want to get technical, Rodgers in game completion percentage was lower than his season pct. I didn't say a FG drive, I said they kicked 4 red zone FGs. One of those was due to an Adams drop, obviously not the fault of Rodgers... Now, are you saying the Pats defense isn't any good?

[slacker00]

I think Rodgers missed some throws early in that game, perhaps to being a little hyped for the matchup. If you want to get technical, Rodgers in game completion percentage was lower than his season pct. I didn't say a FG drive, I said they kicked 4 red zone FGs. One of those was due to an Adams drop, obviously not the fault of Rodgers... Now, are you saying the Pats defense isn't any good?

Are you willing to concede your point about Rodgers? He was firing nails in that game, you were being silly.

[lakerboy]

Slacker argues with everyone. He is hardly ever wrong. Guy is a genius.

[slacker00]

Slacker argues with everyone. He is hardly ever wrong. Guy is a genius.

You are my inspiration, lakerboy. You are my shining idol.

[meader99]

Are you willing to concede your point about Rodgers? He was firing nails in that game, you were being silly.

Rodgers was slightly off playing a good defense. You said either one of those scenarios would result in a loss. There's your point.

[meader99]

ATL scored on every 2H drive. All I'm saying is that if GB hits a real D or Rodgers is slightly off, GB loses.

Just in case you forgot......

[slacker00]

Rodgers was slightly off playing a good defense. You said either one of those scenarios would result in a loss. There's your point.

I will address the the defense, but I need to get past the Rodgers point first. You know you are wrong. Just admit it.

[meader99]

I will address the the defense, but I need to get past the Rodgers point first. You know you are wrong. Just admit it.

Just spoke with Rodgers on the phone......he said he missed some throws he should have hit....he was "slightly" off.

[slacker00]

Just spoke with Rodgers on the phone......he said he missed some throws he should have hit....he was "slightly" off.

He's wrong.

I'll make a stronger point. You are claiming Pats as a "real D", yet Rodgers had a great day against this D. Hardly "off".

[meader99]

He's wrong.

I'll make a stronger point. You are claiming Pats as a "real D", yet Rodgers had a great day against this D. Hardly "off".

Never said off, "slightly" off. Are the Pats a real D, or no?

[slacker00]

Never said off, "slightly" off. Are the Pats a real D, or no?

Rodgers wasn't slightly off, he had a above average game against your claimed "real D".