This can't be right

[No coincidences]

Most Popular Bets View All

Seahawks-NFL	10-28-13 / 8:45 PM	-14.0pts
Seahawks-NFL	10-28-13 / 8:45 PM	-1000
Cardinals-Series Prices	10-31-13 / 8:05 PM	even
Rams-NFL	10-28-13 / 8:45 PM	14.0pts
Red Sox-Series Prices	10-31-13 / 8:05 PM	-120
Cardinals-MLB	10-28-13 / 8:10 PM	-130

At sportsbook.ag.

Are you telling me that they've taken more bets on the Seahawks at -1000 than the Rams +14? Who lays -1000 in an NFL game?

[ACoochy]

Brock

[tatddy]

Who lays -1000 in an NFL game?

Yesterday. But to be fair it's the only time I've ever done it.

[No coincidences]

Brock

To be fair, he said he got it at -650 earlier in the week or something like that. LOL.

[No coincidences]

Yesterday. But to be fair it's the only time I've ever done it.

jesus tat, how much did you put on the game if you were laying 1:10?

[tatddy]

jesus tat, how much did you put on the game if you were laying 1:10?

10K or so. There was zero chance the Niners lost unless the whole team simultaneously died on the field. Plus was hungover and didn't wanna deal with laying points/backdoor etc.

[No coincidences]

10K or so. There was zero chance the Niners lost unless the whole team simultaneously died on the field. Plus was hungover and didn't wanna deal with laying points/backdoor etc.

I got ya.

Well I'd never lay -1000 under any circumstances, but to me, taking the Niners over the Jags is a hell of a lot different than backing the Seahawks on the road against a divisional foe on MNF. I'm not saying Seattle loses by any means, but it's not nearly the same slam-dunk bet as far as I'm concerned.

The gap between the Niners/Jags and Seahawks/Rams isn't anywhere near the same to have identical odds.

[djmano]

10K or so. There was zero chance the Niners lost unless the whole team simultaneously died on the field. Plus was hungover and didn't wanna deal with laying points/backdoor etc.

this is the most badass quote ive ever seen on SBR.

[tatddy]

Coiner like I posted yesterday the true ml on the Niners game should have been -3000. They had zero chance. No refs, players or god could have intervened enough to help.

[Renegades]

Haha the jags!

[Renegades]

Jags are moving to conf usa next year. They open home vs southern miss. Game is a pick

[No coincidences]

Coiner like I posted yesterday the true ml on the Niners game should have been -3000. They had zero chance. No refs, players or god could have intervened enough to help.

I can't argue with that at all.

[easyliving]

I only layed -800

[Vinnie Paz]

Bet -470 or something on saints yesterday. Took them ats too. Something just clicked in ny head like "man why not just hammer the saints straight up, fukk grinding out 6 games, ending up 4-2 and barely over a unit..fukk all that, let's have some fun"

Ended up still grinding out 6 ATS but if the saints hit the rest was just icing on the top, or at least insurance for a disaster.

[pattymayo]

10/28/13 6:53pm

$690.00

$100.00

Pending

10/28/13 8:40pm Reduced Football 231 Seattle Seahawks -690* <small style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">vs</small> St. Louis Rams

don't give a fukk.

games like this is how you build a bankroll

[vyomguy]

10% return with greater than 80% probability.

Read the above statement again and show me how many investments you can make in real life to get that kind of return.

Obviously people are going to jump on that.

[No coincidences]

10% return with greater than 80% probability.

Read the above statement again and show me how many investments you can make in real life to get that kind of return.

Obviously people are going to jump on that.

Anyone willing to lay -1000 in this spot hasn't really watched these two teams play much this year.

Should it hit? Yes. Will it hit? ....

I don't share the numbers you share, vyom re: the probability of ROI.

[Smoke]

10% return with greater than 80% probability.

Read the above statement again and show me how many investments you can make in real life to get that kind of return.

Obviously people are going to jump on that.

no coin buried by the lion

[pavyracer]

Did a -1000 NFL ML play lose this year?

When was the last time a -14 lost straight up in the NFL?

[No coincidences]

no coin buried by the lion

No one "buried" anyone, moron. It's just my opinion of this matchup vs. his. No one is necessarily "right" or "wrong" on the probability of this ML hitting -- we just have how we cap the game compared to the number the books give us.

You can't grasp any concepts re: gambling other than losing or copying other people's picks, though, so I wouldn't expect you to understand.

[Smoke]

I didn't "bury" anyone, moron.

[TwoWays]

Goofball Clemons screwing us

[rm18]

Did a -1000 NFL ML play lose this year?

When was the last time a -14 lost straight up in the NFL?

this one was over -600
http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=331007001

[pavyracer]

this one was over -600
http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=331007001

Yes -600 lose.

But -1000 don't. I can't remember the last time a -14 fav in the NFL lost straight up. Maybe in the 80's.

[rm18]

Yes -600 lose.

But -1000 don't. I can't remember the last time a -14 fav in the NFL lost straight up. Maybe in the 80's.

the line was only -650 or so at pinnacle, sportsbook.ag must of has the highest ML in the world

[PAULYPOKER]

Most Popular Bets View All

Seahawks-NFL	10-28-13 / 8:45 PM	-14.0pts
Seahawks-NFL	10-28-13 / 8:45 PM	-1000
Cardinals-Series Prices	10-31-13 / 8:05 PM	even
Rams-NFL	10-28-13 / 8:45 PM	14.0pts
Red Sox-Series Prices	10-31-13 / 8:05 PM	-120
Cardinals-MLB	10-28-13 / 8:10 PM	-130

At sportsbook.ag.

Are you telling me that they've taken more bets on the Seahawks at -1000 than the Rams +14? Who lays -1000 in an NFL game?

[Crate Mayne]

Shoulda just waited for the live-play... Grabbed -200 for Seahawks beginning of 2nd quarter

[Dutch]

The gap between the Niners/Jags and Seahawks/Rams isn't anywhere near the same to have identical odds.

This.

[Smoke]

Nice edit loser

You weren't fast enough though

[pavyracer]

the line was only -650 or so at pinnacle, sportsbook.ag must of has the highest ML in the world

Something doesn't add up. The Falcons were -9.5. The Seahawks are -13.5. Why are the ML's almost the same?

[TheLock]

LOL I hope the Rams win outright

[Smoke]

Must be those fat cheetos fingers

[PAULYPOKER]

[Bet10Heinekens]

Seahawks ml backers shitting their pants now

[No coincidences]

Seahawks ml backers shitting their pants now

You can get 'em for -130 live now.