Terrible argument. PEDs do aid in performance. Jason Grimsley sucked even though he took PEDs? This proves something? I mean, seriously? Because there are bad players who took it and didn't become better, this means it doesn't make much difference?
You or I could take all the PEDs we wanted and still not become a good baseball player. You have to have talent first.
Barry Bonds never would've hit over 50 homers in a season without steroids.
Clemens would not have lasted as long as he did without all the crap he took.
The difference is that both those guys were very talented, and were able to achieve higher levels with the help of PEDs. There are many more examples of this.
No, Jason Grimsley and Alex Escobar aren't going to become All Stars by injecting some steroids. There is no magic formula that will transform you from mediocre/bad to great.
Terrible argument? Okay, but we only rank on players who woulda been HOFers anyway. It's called jealousy. I could give two shits about what other people do with their lives. It added entertainment value to the game, IMO. MLB surely didn't care, that is, until they got caught. So many people feel betrayed by all this. That's funny to me. I want to see 73 home runs hit by one player. No one really knows for a fact that Bonds could not have hit 50 w/o ..... whatever he took, so we really need to give that up. All these players on the list are inevitably going to be compared with other players on that list. So, let's just make a rule saying no one between 1990 and 2005 get in the HOF. Maybe then, we (or most of us turds) can all be happy.
What do PED's do for the players? I need a somewhat detailed analysis, b/c I haven't a clue. It makes you hit it where they ain't more often? It's give you a great eye/discipline at the plate? If they make you recover from injury faster, then I think that is a good thing, b/c I want to see the stars play, especially when I'm paying so much for the fam to go watch.
Some help you avoid injuries or recover faster (muscle recovery in general).
Surely you can see where athletes can benefit from these things.
For example, the blood doping in cycling. EPO gives someone a decided advantage.
[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
Comment
2daBank
SBR Aristocracy
01-26-09
88966
#75
no doubt, has to be considered among the best hitters of all time
Comment
yisman
SBR Aristocracy
09-01-08
75682
#76
Originally posted by teecee
Terrible argument? Okay, but we only rank on players who woulda been HOFers anyway. It's called jealousy. I could give two shits about what other people do with their lives. It added entertainment value to the game, IMO. MLB surely didn't care, that is, until they got caught. So many people feel betrayed by all this. That's funny to me. I want to see 73 home runs hit by one player. No one really knows for a fact that Bonds could not have hit 50 w/o ..... whatever he took, so we really need to give that up.
Actually, no. Your athletic peak is in your mid to late 20s.
If you peak at 36 and start hitting homers like you never did before, clearly you were on something. There's also the fact that his head grew several sizes and he turned into a tank.
I'd bet my life savings that Bonds never would've gotten close to the HR record without PEDs.
[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
Comment
THEGREAT30
SBR Hall of Famer
10-04-08
8970
#77
too many people in hall doesn't mean so much, Imo, good day
Comment
2daBank
SBR Aristocracy
01-26-09
88966
#78
Originally posted by teecee
Terrible argument? Okay, but we only rank on players who woulda been HOFers anyway. It's called jealousy. I could give two shits about what other people do with their lives. It added entertainment value to the game, IMO. MLB surely didn't care, that is, until they got caught. So many people feel betrayed by all this. That's funny to me. I want to see 73 home runs hit by one player. No one really knows for a fact that Bonds could not have hit 50 w/o ..... whatever he took, so we really need to give that up. All these players on the list are inevitably going to be compared with other players on that list. So, let's just make a rule saying no one between 1990 and 2005 get in the HOF. Maybe then, we (or most of us turds) can all be happy.
What do PED's do for the players? I need a somewhat detailed analysis, b/c I haven't a clue. It makes you hit it where they ain't more often? It's give you a great eye/discipline at the plate? If they make you recover from injury faster, then I think that is a good thing, b/c I want to see the stars play, especially when I'm paying so much for the fam to go watch.
^^^^ this
Comment
2daBank
SBR Aristocracy
01-26-09
88966
#79
Originally posted by yisman
Actually, no. Your athletic peak is in your mid to late 20s.
If you peak at 36 and start hitting homers like you never did before, clearly you were on something. There's also the fact that his head grew several sizes and he turned into a tank.
I'd bet my life savings that Bonds never would've gotten close to the HR record without PEDs.
Probably not, but he was a great player either way, why not be all you can be? no one cared about the speed freaks in the generations before...
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6295
#80
Look, you were apparently against players taking these PED's, which is fine. I could take 'em or leave 'em. I just don't get tearing apart someone's career over this, when a majority (assumption, here) were taking them. So you have batters on PED's facing pitcher on PED's. That seems fair to me.
It just seems like the Tiger Woods deal. Tiger slept with someone other than his wife? OH NO! Rory Sabbatini slept with someone other than his wife? WHO CARES! Wow! Let us just pick and choose who we slay, shall we?
Comment
yisman
SBR Aristocracy
09-01-08
75682
#81
Originally posted by 2daBank
Probably not, but he was a great player either way
I did say that
Originally posted by teecee
Look, you were apparently against players taking these PED's, which is fine. I could take 'em or leave 'em. I just don't get tearing apart someone's career over this, when a majority (assumption, here) were taking them. So you have batters on PED's facing pitcher on PED's. That seems fair to me. It just seems like the Tiger Woods deal. Tiger slept with someone other than his wife? OH NO! Rory Sabbatini slept with someone other than his wife? WHO CARES! Wow! Let us just pick and choose who we slay, shall we?
No, you're changing the argument. What you said was PEDs don't make a difference. I was saying they clearly do.
As to how much crap players should take for breaking the law and the rules of the sport they participate in, that's not up to me and I don't care to talk about it.
I also don't care about who golfers sleep with, so I'm not getting into that.
[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6295
#82
Originally posted by yisman
Some PEDs give you increased strength.
Some give you increased stamina.
Some help you avoid injuries or recover faster (muscle recovery in general).
Surely you can see where athletes can benefit from these things.
For example, the blood doping in cycling. EPO gives someone a decided advantage.
I'm not sure if any of these cover the 'Do PED's make you a better hitter' portion of the paragraph I typed. Not only did Bonds (Bonds, b/c he's being hunted like a witch) hit 73 homers, but didn't he also hit about .380 (with the shift on, if I'm not mistaken), and set a record for walks (about 230, and a stat about which I've never heard asterisks mentioned) in a season. I guess maybe the argument is that if it weren't for PED's, he never would've accomplished those feats either. I don't know, and I guess I'll just never get it, which is cool too. Good day, Yisman.
Comment
will2survive
SBR Hall of Famer
11-26-09
8106
#83
Ichiro is a guaranteed HOF 1st ballot. Have you checked out his record breaking stats?He's on Tony Gwynn's level and he's a great fielder
Comment
yisman
SBR Aristocracy
09-01-08
75682
#84
Originally posted by teecee
I'm not sure if any of these cover the 'Do PED's make you a better hitter' portion of the paragraph I typed. Not only did Bonds (Bonds, b/c he's being hunted like a witch) hit 73 homers, but didn't he also hit about .380 (with the shift on, if I'm not mistaken), and set a record for walks (about 230, and a stat about which I've never heard asterisks mentioned) in a season. I guess maybe the argument is that if it weren't for PED's, he never would've accomplished those feats either. I don't know, and I guess I'll just never get it, which is cool too. Good day, Yisman.
All those things related to PEDs.
Walks of course have an asterisk.
Did he have a great batting eye and great plate discipline? No doubt.
But he never would've drawn close to that many walks were it not for teams pitching around him.
Why were teams pitching around him constantly? Because he was hitting homers at an unheard of rate due to all the 'roids he was taking.
Of course teams would rather walk him in many situations rather than risk giving up a homer.
When Bonds was a singles and doubles hitter, teams didn't pitch around him nearly as much.
So yeah, had Bonds not taken PEDs, he never would have walked even 200 times in a season.
As for whether they make you a better hitter, yes, they make you a better hitter, because power is an integral part of your hitting ability. Same for muscle recovery.
Originally posted by teecee
I'm not sure if any of these cover the 'Do PED's make you a better hitter' portion of the paragraph I typed. Not only did Bonds (Bonds, b/c he's being hunted like a witch) hit 73 homers, but didn't he also hit about .380
No, he did not.
His BA did increase significantly during his peak 'roiding years, though.
Basically, he became a completely different player after using PEDs. If you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend it's normal for someone to become much better at age 35, then who am I to stop you?
[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
Comment
2daBank
SBR Aristocracy
01-26-09
88966
#85
Originally posted by yisman
All those things related to PEDs.
Walks of course have an asterisk.
Did he have a great batting eye and great plate discipline? No doubt.
But he never would've drawn close to that many walks were it not for teams pitching around him.
Why were teams pitching around him constantly? Because he was hitting homers at an unheard of rate due to all the 'roids he was taking.
Of course teams would rather walk him in many situations rather than risk giving up a homer.
When Bonds was a singles and doubles hitter, teams didn't pitch around him nearly as much.
So yeah, had Bonds not taken PEDs, he never would have walked even 200 times in a season.
As for whether they make you a better hitter, yes, they make you a better hitter, because power is an integral part of your hitting ability. Same for muscle recovery.
No, he did not.
His BA did increase significantly during his peak 'roiding years, though.
absolutely, juice increased all his stats....arguing that it didnt is ridiculous, i just dont necessarily have a problem with it
Comment
phillybadboy
SBR Hall of Famer
12-11-09
9383
#86
no man he stinks
Comment
yisman
SBR Aristocracy
09-01-08
75682
#87
yeah and I'm not going to argue the point of whether or not someone should have a problem with it. I've heard people before say they have no problem with athletes taking illegal substances because they want to see players become even greater or whatever.
It's just that it clearly did improve performance in the cases of Bonds and several other high profile athletes.
[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
Comment
Willie Bee
SBR Posting Legend
02-14-06
15726
#88
Originally posted by THEGREAT30
too many people in hall doesn't mean so much, Imo, good day
Curious to know who you'd throw out? Everyone has their own criteria, and mine has always been was the player among the top 10% of his contemporaries at his position. I don't think there's any argument that Ichiro has been among the top 20 outfielders, maybe top 10, the last eight years.
It's when you compare Pujols to Ruth, Greg Maddux to Cy Young, etc, that's when any argument becomes totally subjective and useless in my opinion.
Who would you throw out, Great30?
Comment
mlb
SBR Posting Legend
12-04-09
10509
#89
Very true .. Willie .. can't start comparing, no way to just foolish.
I think he should be in, been one of the best for years now and could have been even better if he was here longer.
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63165
#90
guy might play till he is 45......
Comment
Muddy
SBR Wise Guy
09-16-09
621
#91
SUZUKI, like the motorcycle. And, yes.
Comment
encephalization
SBR Sharp
02-26-10
491
#92
Defo..
Comment
trytrytry
SBR Posting Legend
03-13-06
23649
#93
first ballet.
Comment
teecee
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-09
6295
#94
Originally posted by 2daBank
absolutely, juice increased all his stats....arguing that it didnt is ridiculous, i just dont necessarily have a problem with it
This point is one I was definitely trying to get across. Bigger numbers bring me more excitement, and probably for a majority of fans as well.
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63165
#95
just passed 1,000 career runs scored...
seems well on his way (barring injury) to his 10th consecutive 200+ hit season
Comment
dynamite140
SBR MVP
07-05-08
4958
#96
Best contact hitter in baseball.
Comment
nbt3428
SBR Sharp
01-13-10
366
#97
I don't really like Ichiro but I have nothing but respect for him on that field, he hits like a machine and has been doing so since he came over from Japan. I'd vote for him.
Comment
TGHMak
SBR Wise Guy
02-25-09
658
#98
Ichiro is the only reason I worry about going against the Mariners this year.
Comment
Grind House
SBR MVP
01-01-10
1405
#99
Hall of famer. One of the best on base hitters ever, and plays the outfield better than your average.
Comment
Intuitive_Edge
SBR MVP
07-22-09
1644
#100
yup
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63165
#101
guy has an arm
Comment
Bigmikesm
SBR MVP
06-17-09
1616
#102
The guy would be a shoe-in if he played here 5 years earlier. Don't think he will make it because of that.
Comment
Donkwin47
SBR MVP
03-12-10
2851
#103
Originally posted by daggerkobe
Japan: 1278 Hits
USA: 1805 Hits
Total: 3083 Hits
How I read this:
Japan: 1278 Hits
USA: 1805 Hits
Total: 1805 Hits
Comment
bornselling
SBR Wise Guy
12-02-09
568
#104
over 200 hits EVERY season
over 100 runs EVERY season
Comment
ttwarrior1
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
06-23-09
28443
#105
uh easy, 1st ballot and he's not retiring any time soon