GL Razz- You are cheating going up to -120. It's easily obtainable at -120 but -110 or less is very tough.
Hitting 57 out of 100 games discussion
Collapse
X
-
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#1Hitting 57 out of 100 games discussionTags: None -
TerrisSBR Sharp
- 08-23-05
- 299
#2yeah sure hes cheating...here are your nice little pills raiders. At least hes posting something interesting, something you didnt manage to do with your 400 posts lol.
Oh btw, i was thinking fav bets are losers anyway? Me thinks you dont know your own stuff too well haha...Comment -
rm18SBR Posting Legend
- 09-20-05
- 22291
#3Although I guess I might be one of the ones making supposedly outlandish claims, I agree that is cheating, you need to hit 55% to break even at -120.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#4Terris- You are really slow. It's much easier to hit a higher percentage at a line of -120 than -110.Comment -
TerrisSBR Sharp
- 08-23-05
- 299
#5Originally posted by raiders72001Terris- You are really slow. It's much easier to hit a higher percentage at a line of -120 than -110.
Is that clear enough for you? lol...Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#6Terris- You should work on your reading comprehension. He's not going to play +120 games. If he played -110 or less it would be impressive. -120 is easy.Comment -
TerrisSBR Sharp
- 08-23-05
- 299
#7yeah sure, everything someone else is doing is easy. Only what the great raiders tells us is sooo amazing and the whole truth. I think you must be the biggest ego on this board, good thing its only the net, and noone has to give a shit about you lolComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#8Terris- What if a guy played all -200 lines and hit 57%. Don't you see the difference in the claim at -110 compared to -200. I said that you cannot hit 57% using equal lines -110/+110 or -104/+104. Use a binomial distribution chart. It will show you how hard it is to win at a rate of 57% over 100 trials.Comment -
EBoneSBR MVP
- 08-10-05
- 1787
#9If my math is correct, even if he played all 100 games @ -120, 55% yields a winner of 1 unit. The thread is called "Razz's 57 out of 100". He has built in a 2 game fudge factor just to make sure. I think the rules he has laid out are more than fair.
I didn't say it but its a given......good luck to you, Razz. We'll be rootin for you.
EComment -
IllusionRestricted User
- 08-09-05
- 25166
#10Do you guys care if I split this thread?Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#11Feel free to delete all my stuff since I crapped up Razz's thread.Comment -
RazzSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-22-05
- 5632
#12Meaning what exactly?Comment -
EBoneSBR MVP
- 08-10-05
- 1787
#13Raiders,
I guess this is what I'm trying to say:
100 games @ -110 @ 57% (assuming each game bet is one unit) yields 9.7 units.
100 games @ -120 @ 57% (assuming each game bet is one unit) yields 5.4 units.
My personal opinion is that: I think its tough either way. I'm certainly no pro but if I could hit 57% on a consistent basis in every sport I bet.......I would be a professional gambler and wouldn't have to be working for the man 8 to 5. $1K per unit....that would be pretty sweet.
Sorry, Razz. I guess I should have taken this message to another thread. I just want to state that I think 57% is tough in football no matter how you slice it.
EComment -
EBoneSBR MVP
- 08-10-05
- 1787
#14Split away, Illusion. I shouldn't have posted that last message in this thread.
EComment -
TerrisSBR Sharp
- 08-23-05
- 299
#15please illusion...sorry for all the useless posts, you could delete mine too.Comment -
IllusionRestricted User
- 08-09-05
- 25166
#16Alright, let's keep this going. This is an interesting topic.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#17My personal opinion is that: I think its tough either way. I'm certainly no pro but if I could hit 57% on a consistent basis in every sport I bet.......I would be a professional gambler and wouldn't have to be working for the man 8 to 5. $1K per unit....that would be pretty sweet.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#18As EBone just showed you could make great money at 57%. If you play at reduced shops -104 and -105 you can make a fortune at 54%.Comment -
EBoneSBR MVP
- 08-10-05
- 1787
#19Could not agree more with that post......in the olden days, every street bookie was @ -110 on sides and some had -120 on totals. Now, if you were winning during those days, the times now would yield you some serious jack........
EComment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#20and baseball lines were 20 centsComment -
RazzSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-22-05
- 5632
#21Are you satisfied with what I said about only playing 5 or so games that are more than -110, raiders? Honestly, I think everything more than balances out with the large amount of Even to -105 games I will be playing.
OK, I'm going to bed. Good luck with whoever everyone takes tomorrow, as long as its not the Red Sox.Comment -
raiders72001Senior Member
- 08-10-05
- 11126
#22Razz- Good luck with your plays. Big Saturday and Sunday with foots and Bos/NYY baseball.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code