In regards to www.betwwts.com
I played overnight Rangers 500 @+190
However there was a pitching change and the rangers line moved to +118. Keep in mind I had already locked in my bet at +190 the night before. I also bet the "action" and not the individual pitchers themselves, so a pitching change should have had no bearing on my wager.
Well the rangers covered and when the wager was graded, the sportsbook decided to pay me at only +118.
If you log in and click on "help", then "sports betting rules", then "baseball" it clearly states,
"If there is a pitching change prior to the game, money odds will be adjusted. If one scheduled pitcher starts against any unscheduled pitcher, "action" wagers will be computed by the opening price with the new pitcher. A pitcher is deemed a starting pitcher after throwing one pitch."
So it is my interpretation that the Opening price(+190) will still be honored, but i am now risking that opening price with a new pitcher, which was fine with me. Afterall I had taken the "action" , not any individual pitcher themselves.
In another section, they have this stated,
"5.9 If there is a pitching change prior to the game, money odds will be adjusted. If one scheduled pitcher starts against any unscheduled pitcher, "action" bets will be computed by the closing price with the new pitcher. A pitcher is deemed a starting pitcher after throwing one pitch."
If this was the only rule they had on their site, I would understand that I'm out of luck and taken my loss, but because they had the other rule on their website (which is what I saw when I initially placed my wager) I feel as though I should still be paid, or if not, the book should reach some kind of middle ground due to their error.
Does that make sense to you? I know this is only a difference of approx $300 but I just don't see how this is fair. It is a descrepancy on their part for having two different rules on their site regarding a pitching change.
I'd like some opinions.....
I played overnight Rangers 500 @+190
However there was a pitching change and the rangers line moved to +118. Keep in mind I had already locked in my bet at +190 the night before. I also bet the "action" and not the individual pitchers themselves, so a pitching change should have had no bearing on my wager.
Well the rangers covered and when the wager was graded, the sportsbook decided to pay me at only +118.
If you log in and click on "help", then "sports betting rules", then "baseball" it clearly states,
"If there is a pitching change prior to the game, money odds will be adjusted. If one scheduled pitcher starts against any unscheduled pitcher, "action" wagers will be computed by the opening price with the new pitcher. A pitcher is deemed a starting pitcher after throwing one pitch."
So it is my interpretation that the Opening price(+190) will still be honored, but i am now risking that opening price with a new pitcher, which was fine with me. Afterall I had taken the "action" , not any individual pitcher themselves.
In another section, they have this stated,
"5.9 If there is a pitching change prior to the game, money odds will be adjusted. If one scheduled pitcher starts against any unscheduled pitcher, "action" bets will be computed by the closing price with the new pitcher. A pitcher is deemed a starting pitcher after throwing one pitch."
If this was the only rule they had on their site, I would understand that I'm out of luck and taken my loss, but because they had the other rule on their website (which is what I saw when I initially placed my wager) I feel as though I should still be paid, or if not, the book should reach some kind of middle ground due to their error.
Does that make sense to you? I know this is only a difference of approx $300 but I just don't see how this is fair. It is a descrepancy on their part for having two different rules on their site regarding a pitching change.
I'd like some opinions.....