Colts Backers - Are u Fukking Retarded?

nobs · 02-05-10, 02:03 PM

I will take the 4 1/2, and I bet this game is decided by 4 or less either way.

Snowball · 02-05-10, 02:07 PM

Originally posted by ZBOIZ

Sharp post.

All the squares are on the Colts because of Manning. How square is that ?

laughing my ass off.

seen you post losers til the sun don't shine, and you think you're anything but fade material ?

"sharps" in a Superbowl ????
"squares" betting for clearly the best team in the NFL on a low point spread ?????????

you sound like a wannabe.

brandon m · 02-05-10, 02:17 PM

Well you have some good points. But the main point is that Manning is bar none the best QB in the game right now, he has amazingly some decent receivers again. Double Reggie, well guess who we got one on one. Austin Collie? Pierre Garcon? I just think the Colts are better as a whole on offense. The saints have better numbers but they ran up the score alot. And the numbers really aren't that much better 37 more ypg, isn't that big a deal when the other team has Manning.

The colts won a whole bunch of games this year from behind, on last minute drives and on big defensive stops. The Saints won a few close ones but they also lost to some really bad teams in close games. People will say the saints didn't want those wins anyways but thats BS no team wants to lose a football game. The Colts have a huge edge in experience.

Defensively I think the edge may be with the saints but the saints also racked up some big turnover numbers against again some really bad teams. Alot of those were when the game was already well undercontrol and basically just padding the stats on teams that were throwing the ball every single down. They'll have a much harder time forcing turnovers against Manning.

Capybara · 02-05-10, 02:19 PM

This guy's post is funny. Hey, if you're gonna come out with your opinion, you might as well go all out and call everyone else fukkin retards! I got a good chuckle.

A tough game to cap, as everyone should see by this point, but when in doubt, you always go with the experience and the professionalism, which is all COLTS. They've been there before, they EXPECT to win, they participate in ZERO trash talk, they are all business. And Manning is the best ever.

So you give the points. But you don't bet a ton. And then you play around with a bunch of props! :-D

statnerds · 02-05-10, 02:20 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Pretty cocky for someone betting a line 1.5 points off of where he could have gotten it. You'd think as a "stat nerd" you'd be the kind of person to get the best line.

i never saw it hit 6 and i doubt you could provide evidence that it did. i would rather have +100 on 4.5 than -110 on a dead fukking number. my bad, 1.68% of games according to the .5 ptr.

and i'm not going to buy pts to get to a number that will not matter.

so +4.5 +100 is the best line for me.

DwightShrute · 02-05-10, 02:30 PM

Colt backers repeat after me ....

I AM SOFA KING WE TODD ID

statnerds · 02-05-10, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by Glitch

the only teams that the colts have struggled with at all this season have been ones with potent running games. their defense overall has been pretty solid.

Texans led the NFL and Pats were 3rd in passing. both teams lit up the Colts D. funny it is luck when Saints get turnovers, but when Moats fumbles on the Colts 1, it isn't. kind of like when Flacco had them beat in Baltimore earlier this year but threw a pick on the Indy 10.

and I am not betting against Manning.I am betting against this injury ridden defense.they will not be able to hide Wheeler, Lacey and Bullit from the Saints. just like you don't end up 18th ranked defense by accident, you don't end up #1 in offense by accident.

7 of 14 reg season wins by 4 pts or less.

here is my number 1 rule when handicapping NFL

No team is as good as everyone says and no team is as bad as everyone says.

jordan · 02-05-10, 02:34 PM

colts under

DrStale · 02-05-10, 02:37 PM

Originally posted by statnerds

i never saw it hit 6 and i doubt you could provide evidence that it did.

Bookmaker:
01/25 18:12 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/25 20:10 +6 -110 / -6 -110

Bodog:
1/25 13:47 +6 -115 / -6 -10501/25 18:23 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/26 11:17 +6 -105 / -6 -115
01/26 11:25 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/27 10:54 +6 -105 / -6 -115
02/01 09:58 +6 -110 / -6 -110
02/01 19:11 +6 -115 / -6 -105
02/02 23:30 +6 -120 / -6 +100

LooseLines:
01/30 13:00 +6 -110 / -6 -110

Greek:
01/25 19:10 +6 -110 / -6 -110

BetJam:
01/25 18:03 +6 -110 / -6 -110

Oops.

Hilljacademics · 02-05-10, 02:38 PM

Colts -5.5 and under 56.5 and CONTENT.

BigdaddyQH · 02-05-10, 02:38 PM

First of all, you are absolutely wrong about the line hitting 6 points, and I can easily prove it. If you made this wager 4 days ago,like you claim, you could have taken New Orleans +6 at seeral different books, both in Vegas and offshore. If you do not believe it, how about a little wager, say 300 points?

Next, you failed to talk into consideration the numbe of points given up in the 2nd half. The Colts gave up a total of 3 points in the 2nd half, while the Saints have given up 14. If you go back and study the points given up bu the Colts in their meaningful games, you will see that they gave up many fewer points in the 2nd half than the 1st half.

The best wager on the board will be the under in the 2nd half. Both teams really tone it down in the 2nd half offensively. If the game is close, neither team will take a lot of chances.

S.K.M. · 02-05-10, 02:54 PM

NO put up two touchdowns in the second half against Minny. One of the drives started on the Vikes 10 yard line after a fumble. The other started on the Vikes 35 after a big kickoff return. The Saints offense was unable to put together any kind of a drive in the whole half and they were at home. Also correct me if im wrong here but I dont remember Brees getting sacked even once? He surely was not under much pressure and they still only came up with 250 yards total offense. Is the Vikings D that much better than the Colts? The strength of the Vikes D is supposedly their pass rush which seemed non-existant againt NO and somehow the vikes still held them to 250 yards

Cyborg9 · 02-05-10, 03:06 PM

statnerds · 02-05-10, 04:02 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Bookmaker:
01/25 18:12 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/25 20:10 +6 -110 / -6 -110

01/25 18:12 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/25 18:16 +5½ -110 / -5½ -110
01/25 20:10 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/25 20:11 +5½ -110 / -5½ -110

oops.

funny you left out the part where it was 6 for 4 minutes and then for 1 minute. man, how did i miss that. shady fukk.

statnerds · 02-05-10, 04:03 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Greek:
01/25 19:10 +6 -110 / -6 -110

01/25 19:10 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/25 19:18 +5½ -110 / -5½ -110

i could do this all day fanboy

statnerds · 02-05-10, 04:05 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

BetJam:
01/25 18:03 +6 -110 / -6 -110

01/25 18:03 +6 -110 / -6 -110
01/25 18:19 +5½ -110 / -5½ -110

13 minutes on that one. man you are fukking shady.

statnerds · 02-05-10, 04:08 PM

Originally posted by BigdaddyQH

First of all, you are absolutely wrong about the line hitting 6 points, and I can easily prove it. If you made this wager 4 days ago,like you claim, you could have taken New Orleans +6 at seeral different books, both in Vegas and offshore. If you do not believe it, how about a little wager, say 300 points?

Next, you failed to talk into consideration the numbe of points given up in the 2nd half. The Colts gave up a total of 3 points in the 2nd half, while the Saints have given up 14. If you go back and study the points given up bu the Colts in their meaningful games, you will see that they gave up many fewer points in the 2nd half than the 1st half.

The best wager on the board will be the under in the 2nd half. Both teams really tone it down in the 2nd half offensively. If the game is close, neither team will take a lot of chances.

i knew it, you guys are the R word. don't you have a spell check?

last Tuesday was actually 11 days ago.

nobull · 02-05-10, 04:09 PM

a short midget like BREEZ will not get into rythmn with at least 10 balls batted down for the SB, while Manning the 6'5" goliath will have a field day looking down on the Saints D-Line.

its a done deal, the brown bags don't have a chance and the score will be a blowout.

Mr Handicapable · 02-05-10, 05:36 PM

Statnerds,

You guys on the Saints are getting alot of mileage out of this 18th ranked Colts D stat? Guess it doesn't matter that they were 2nd in the NFL in lowest points allowed when the games actually mattered to them (13-0)! They held Baltimore to 18 points in 2 games (no TDs)....the same Ravens team that put up 31 on the road against San Diego and Minnesota! The Saints are outclassed on both sides of the ball with or without Freeney! Saints will still get offense but Colts 34-27 and the cover!!

Mr Handicapable · 02-05-10, 05:42 PM

Lets also look at the divisional opponents too:

Colts while at 14-0....Titans, Jags, and Texans were all 7-7.....7-5 against everyone else but Indy

Saints division....you have Jake "Grossman Throws" Delhomme, Tampa w/the guy nobody has heard of as the head coach, and Atlanta who had Michael Turner out most of the year!

Colts 42 Rams 6
Saints 28 Rams 23

Need I say more?

Grandmaster B · 02-05-10, 05:45 PM

you know betting the side here is too tough for me so I settled on the OVER

Ill tell you this though...you can bet AGAINST Peyton Manning at your own risk

DaColts · 02-05-10, 05:50 PM

Go Colts Go you f-ing retard I can't wait for Sunday cause off people like you dumb a@@

statnerds · 02-05-10, 06:20 PM

Originally posted by Mr Handicapable

Colts 42 Rams 6
Saints 28 Rams 23

Need I say more?

yep

Colts 35
Pats 34

Saints 38
Pats 17

DwightShrute · 02-05-10, 06:27 PM

Originally posted by statnerds

yep

Colts 35
Pats 34

Saints 38
Pats 17

DaColts · 02-05-10, 06:42 PM

I heard it best today the colts started the season as a good team ended as a great team. Look at scores for the season to season end. On the other hand the saints started the season great and ended good. Losing to the laugable TBay blown out by Dallas ot in Washington. It's kinda like the NE when they lost the super bowl. The colts have won 26 of 27 with starters finishing a gam only lose was OT to SD in the playoff. So go f off

statnerds · 02-05-10, 07:01 PM

okay, let's make it real simple:

Colts will play a conservative Cover 2 all game to keep everything in front of them.

Wheeler
Lacey
Bullitt
Powers

tltaylor89 · 02-05-10, 07:26 PM

Saints do not do well on real grass

THEGREAT30 · 02-05-10, 07:32 PM

34-21 Colts book it

DwightShrute · 02-05-10, 07:34 PM

Originally posted by tltaylor89

Saints do not do well on real grass

why?

Why would the Colts?

They both play on artificial turf when they play at home.

They both played in Miami during the season at the exact same stadium they will be playing the Superbowl, Saints scored 46 and the Colts 27

Grandmaster B · 02-05-10, 07:35 PM

I think if Freeney dosent play that helps the over eh?

Brocc · 02-05-10, 08:31 PM

Originally posted by Mr Handicapable

Statnerds,

You guys on the Saints are getting alot of mileage out of this 18th ranked Colts D stat? Guess it doesn't matter that they were 2nd in the NFL in lowest points allowed when the games actually mattered to them (13-0)! They held Baltimore to 18 points in 2 games (no TDs)....the same Ravens team that put up 31 on the road against San Diego and Minnesota! The Saints are outclassed on both sides of the ball with or without Freeney! Saints will still get offense but Colts 34-27 and the cover!!

But they forget to mention the 25th ranked Saints defense. They forget to mention the Colts only turned the ball over 3 times all year on fumbles lost. They forget to mention that the Colts leading rusher, Addei has more rushing yards than Thomas. They forget to mention that the Colts ALSO average 2 takeaways per game. They forget to mention that the Colts have a much better kicking game. They want to say that the Saints D is a turnover machine, well they average just under 1 INT AT HOME & .6 INTS on the road...SO take them out of their dome and the Saints D is totally different. They forget to mention Brees average 1.25 sacks a game, Manning well below .7 sacks a game. They forget to mention the Saints average 1+ turnovers a game. Colts less than half that.

I can go on & on...but what's the point? That's why the play the game & that's why there's a 5.5 pt spread.

DOMINATER · 02-05-10, 08:43 PM

Stat you got n.o. But yu love the colts? Aren't you afraid of colts pouring it on , plus i have doubts the way your story goes the saints will only score 17 0r so that makes the colts scoring around 40 5 to 6 touchdowns to cover if they pull to far in front 4 th quarter may be low scoring

DrStale · 02-05-10, 10:11 PM

Whatever you say chief. The bottom line is you're not getting the best line. Line watchers got 6, you got 4.5. Everyone who takes their capping seriously at all still got 5.5, so youre still off. Let me know when you get a clue.

bruce_outside · 02-05-10, 10:28 PM

my guess is that the colts have at most 1 turnover and manning dominates.

statnerds · 02-05-10, 10:43 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Whatever you say chief. The bottom line is you're not getting the best line. Line watchers got 6, you got 4.5. Everyone who takes their capping seriously at all still got 5.5, so youre still off. Let me know when you get a clue.

line watchers? who the fukk has time to watch lines? the less than 1% of bettors that are pros? did those same line watchers get 55.5 like i did?

5.5 is a dead number because 5 is a dead number. i don't need the 6.

when Saints cover the 4.5 i want you and ever other misguided shit talker to bend down and cyber fellate me

recognize