This is completely nerdy, but here goes. This pertains to the Super Bowl only, because the ML will go down for the Bengals, and the spread will let's assume stay at a cherry +4.5 for the Bengals.
The Bengals are +175 on the ML and +4.5 on the spread.
Eventually with all the Bengals ML bets you can assume +165 ML and +4.5 spread. Right?
What's the right play.
The right play is +4.5.
The public thinks of it as you get your money and an extra 65%.
But the books have one goal-that's to get your $. The books look at it this way.
Let's say you put $1000 on the game.
If you put $1000 on the ML, you get $2650 in return.
If you put $1000 on the spread, you get about $1900 in return.
So the real choice is $1900 or $2650. And the extra $750 for $1900 is 39%. PLUS you are giving up +4.5, which essentially means the Rams have to win by a touchdown or more, for that extra 39%.
You have to choose the points if you're on the Bengals. And if you're on the Rams you should choose the ML. Because the public is going to drive the ML for the Rams down, and +4.5 is essentially forcing the Rams to win by a touchdown or double digits for only a 39% extra return.
That is the way you look at it imo
The Bengals are +175 on the ML and +4.5 on the spread.
Eventually with all the Bengals ML bets you can assume +165 ML and +4.5 spread. Right?
What's the right play.
The right play is +4.5.
The public thinks of it as you get your money and an extra 65%.
But the books have one goal-that's to get your $. The books look at it this way.
Let's say you put $1000 on the game.
If you put $1000 on the ML, you get $2650 in return.
If you put $1000 on the spread, you get about $1900 in return.
So the real choice is $1900 or $2650. And the extra $750 for $1900 is 39%. PLUS you are giving up +4.5, which essentially means the Rams have to win by a touchdown or more, for that extra 39%.
You have to choose the points if you're on the Bengals. And if you're on the Rams you should choose the ML. Because the public is going to drive the ML for the Rams down, and +4.5 is essentially forcing the Rams to win by a touchdown or double digits for only a 39% extra return.
That is the way you look at it imo