NFL - PLAYOFF Plays

[boomer62]

Slick turf? How about weak secondaries and 2 qb's that throw the ball down the field.

[leetreaper]

turf lol

[cankid]

gl sunday

[Smoke]

Did he win?

[LT Profits]

NFL Championship Game Addition

SUNDAY, 1/18
Packers / Seahawks UNDER 46.5 -105 (Heritage)


YTD: 78-53-2, +24.58

[boomer62]

LT, why you bet so early? I believe the total will rise later in the week depending on Rogers, which we all know will be fine. I'm also leaning to over. I think GB will play very aggressive and try and jump on Seattle and force Wilson to throw. Carolina moved the ball very well but turned it over in the red Zone twice. GB worth a play for first half also.

[LT Profits]

LT, why you bet so early? I believe the total will rise later in the week depending on Rogers, which we all know will be fine. I'm also leaning to over. I think GB will play very aggressive and try and jump on Seattle and force Wilson to throw. Carolina moved the ball very well but turned it over in the red Zone twice. GB worth a play for first half also.

I disagree on a couple of things. First I don't think the total will go higher, I think it is already inflated for a Seattle game, I have this closer to 42. Second I am not so confident that Rodgers will be fine, he was not his usual mobile self last week and Legion of Doom will make him pay for it a lot more than Dallas did. That does not mean Packers cannot cover +7.5, but I expect relatively low scoring game regardless.

[slacker00]

LT, why you bet so early? I believe the total will rise later in the week depending on Rogers, which we all know will be fine. I'm also leaning to over. I think GB will play very aggressive and try and jump on Seattle and force Wilson to throw. Carolina moved the ball very well but turned it over in the red Zone twice. GB worth a play for first half also.

Even when Rodgers was 100% healthy, GB only scored 16 and 12 in their previous 2 trips to Seattle.

[boomer62]

I understand about Rogers,can always take the needle(I think he did last week at half time)looked so much better and with another week of treatment should be better. I think the total will jump a few points closer to game time when bettors hear that he is better,just my assumption.
But, both teams should be in the high twenties, at least I think so. Like I said, if I was McCarthy I would be aggressive and try and jump out early on Seattle. Not let Seattle get the running game going like Dallas. He was very conservative with play calling not knowing how Rogers would be but turned it up more in the second half. If he is conservative, Seattle will run the ball on them like Dallas. He needs to be very aggressive but that's what I don't get sometimes with these coaches as they play not to lose. That's why you got to love Belichick, he goes for the throat and let's Brady throw 50 times if he has to. GL to you.

[boomer62]

Even when Rodgers was 100% healthy, GB only scored 16 and 12 in their previous 2 trips to Seattle.

Means nothing,its when they played, this is a whole new ball game. One step away from Super Bowl, winner take all.

[LT Profits]

"Trying" to jump out early and actually doing it against the best secondary in football are two different things. We shall see.

[LT Profits]

1 NFL Playoff Addition

SUNDAY, 1/18
Packers +8.5 -105 (Heritage)
Packers / Seahawks UNDER 46.5 -105 (Heritage)

[RavensFan2k3]

SUNDAY, 1/18
Packers +8.5 -105 (Heritage)
Packers / Seahawks UNDER 46.5 -105 (Heritage)

Heritage had it at +9.5

[Iona]

Thanks LT.

On GB 1H +5; Seattle many times starts slow.

As always, BOL !

[LT Profits]

Heritage had it at +9.5

I missed it was only up for 10 minutes. But really no significant difference between +8.5, +9 and +9.5.

[ManOfValue]

The scariest thing here for Packers bettors is that despite 61% of the public money on GB the like went from -7 to -9 since opening.

[italianbandit]

The scariest thing here for Packers bettors is that despite 61% of the public money on GB the like went from -7 to -9 since opening.

You can't trust % reports, there isn't a regulating body that monitors this stuff. Good luck today.

[Barnes & Whine]

Could be line manipulation trying to make it look like GB is the losing side.

[RavensFan2k3]

Could be line manipulation trying to make it look like GB is the losing side.

Exactly, this happens on a daily basis but for some reason SBR posters interpret that line move as money must have came in on the other side smh

[ManOfValue]

Not quite guys. my piont was simply that the sharper players were on Seattle. Tough loss LT, this game should have never gone over but htats FB...

[PolackDave]

There was a lot of insanity in that game towards the end

[LT Profits]

At least I added Green Bay for the split but still...

[boomer62]

LT, why you bet so early? I believe the total will rise later in the week depending on Rogers, which we all know will be fine. I'm also leaning to over. I think GB will play very aggressive and try and jump on Seattle and force Wilson to throw. Carolina moved the ball very well but turned it over in the red Zone twice. GB worth a play for first half also.

LT, must say good call on the under. Just bad luck. I was very lucky and thankful, crazy ending. Took GB first half, early in week. Waited before game time and pulled the trigger on the over because Rogers fine and weather calmed down. That onside kick should never have happened. Funny half time line was 21.5 and most books had 23.5 so I bet the the second half over and hit. The lines were very sharp. Seattle should have been -4 and was 7-7.5 , totally inflated and no value. And I thought the total was undervalued due to perception of Seattle D and Rogers injury. You got a great # on under but I find I'd rather wait till game time to follow the money and weather conditions.

[LT Profits]

Super Bowl Play

SUNDAY, 2/1
Patriots / Seahawks UNDER 24 +100 (First Half) (5 Dimes)


YTD: 79-54-2, +24.53

[Big Bear]

any reasoning?

[LT Profits]

any reasoning?

I could add full-game Under later. Seattle defense is better than any defense the Pats have faced all year and Seahawks are conservative by nature. Prefer first half for now because Pats might make successful adjustments at halftime while Brady plays with his balls.

[LT Profits]

1 Super Bowl Addition

SUNDAY, 2/1
Patriots / Seahawks UNDER 47.5 -102 (Heritage)
Patriots / Seahawks UNDER 24 +100 (First Half) (5 Dimes)


YTD: 79-54-2, +24.53

[LT Profits]

3rd Super Bowl Play

SUNDAY, 2/1
Seahawks -1 -101 (Heritage)
Patriots / Seahawks UNDER 47.5 -102 (Heritage)
Patriots / Seahawks UNDER 24 +100 (First Half) (5 Dimes)

[gizmo2431]

What the primary reason you lean Seattle?

[LT Profits]

What the primary reason you lean Seattle?

Great defenses win championships. And Pats can be run on.

[cankid]

thanks for the plays, im taking a shot at No Score 1st 730 minutes

[LEOLEO]

like i said, the play is seattle or FADE,
LT glad to see your on board,
all other ne backers dont listen too, there ALL SQUARES

[mikestu]

like i said, the play is seattle or FADE,
LT glad to see your on board,
all other ne backers dont listen too, there ALL SQUARES

Lol there is more money on Seattle. Doesn't matter if 57% is on New England. More money is on Seattle. Same situation with the Ravens 49ers super bowl. Public 55% on ravens but 61% of the money was on Niners. Ravens win outright. Stop talking about things you are absolutely clueless with. Idiot.

[slacker00]

Lol there is more money on Seattle. Doesn't matter if 57% is on New England. More money is on Seattle. Same situation with the Ravens 49ers super bowl. Public 55% on ravens but 61% of the money was on Niners. Ravens win outright. Stop talking about things you are absolutely clueless with. Idiot.

Care to cite your source? Most people spew so much BS like they run Vegas or something.

[dkthrilla33]

like i said, the play is seattle or FADE,
LT glad to see your on board,
all other ne backers dont listen too, there ALL SQUARES

How is pars square??? Sea are defending champs! Smh