Why do I bet on teams with losers at QB?

[No coincidences]

First Dalton and now Rivers. Why?

And now I'm considering Romo tonight....



Winners win, losers lose.

[thebestthereis]

I do this from time to time trying to out think myself cause another team is usually getting points or it won't make sense. if you avoid shit qb's or at least take the better qb (not crazy spreads) you will win more than you lose. I don't know the ats stats but it must be 58%+ over any given time. you cannot turn the ball over ever and win.

[brewcrew2k]

First Dalton and now Rivers. Why?

And now I'm considering Romo tonight....



Winners win, losers lose.

Because sometimes losers cover the bleeping spread!!!!

[Speedy88]

Kinda sad but true, but I bet if you bet on Peyton, Brees and Rodgers every game you'd hit close to 60%.

[thebestthereis]

you have to bet every game, you bet the winning qbs and organizations period and never look back.

[No coincidences]

Kinda sad but true, but I bet if you bet on Peyton, Brees and Rodgers every game you'd hit close to 60%.

These days, you're probably right. Those three are a combined 15-8-1 ATS this season, or 65%.

Then again, ATS-wise, the three losers I mentioned are pretty good this year too. They just can't actually win games.

[NardVa]

Dalton screwed me this week. No way the Bengals should have lost to the Ravens. Rivers screwed me last week when the Chargers lost to the Skins.

[Speedy88]

Dallas looks tempting tonight. But it goes against simple logic. Never bet against Brees on primetime in the dome. Never bet on Romo in primetime.

[Big Bang Clock]

Dallas looks tempting tonight. But it goes against simple logic. Never bet against Brees on primetime in the dome. Never bet on Romo in primetime.

So true. Dallas looks tempting but at the same time - they are playing against Brees in the dome so it was a Saints Auto-Bet.

[Big Bear]

just make an adjustment