1/12 Penn @ La Salle (-7)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rofacapper
    SBR High Roller
    • 10-22-10
    • 119

    #1
    1/12 Penn @ La Salle (-7)
    Anyone else think -7 is too low? La Salle isn't bad, and should win this one by double digits. Penn 344 out of 345 in rebounding!
  • drfunkmaster
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 11-29-08
    • 11162

    #2
    penn played well tonight against illinois...
    Comment
    • rofacapper
      SBR High Roller
      • 10-22-10
      • 119

      #3
      Penn State played well you mean.
      Comment
      • gamble
        SBR MVP
        • 06-30-10
        • 1087

        #4
        yea that was penn state, but yea lasalle is pretty solid, although i don't know much about penn i'll look into it
        Comment
        • rofacapper
          SBR High Roller
          • 10-22-10
          • 119

          #5
          Looking more at La Salle, they seem to play to the level of their competition. In this game, I think they will be able to dominate the boards, but they've played teams worse than Penn and won by less than 7. I think they SHOULD cover, and playing at home will help, but this doesn't look as great to me after looking into more of La Salle's games against lesser competition.
          Comment
          • LockPickMaster
            SBR MVP
            • 02-15-09
            • 1943

            #6
            Good info on Penn:
            PENNSYLVANIA QUAKERS 5-6 (4-4 ATS)
            LASALLE EXPLORERS 7-9 | 0-2 Conf (4-7 ATS)
            PENN's Sparsely Used Roster
            Has advantage of solid, savvy Vets

            1. 6-1 Sr Rosen (37 MPG)
            2. 6-3 Fr Cartwright
            3. 6-6 Jr Belcore
            4. 6-6 Sr Bernardini
            5. 6-8 Sr Eggleton (38 MPG, Plyd All But 17 Min Pn Gms)

            Quakers' are deceptively proficient Offensively
            & when motivated
            Penn's highly experienced Starters (Top 10% Exp)
            Is 2-0-1 ATS vs #6, #7, #11 RPI Tms
            (Nova, Pitt & Ky)

            Two 2010-2011 surprises for Penn
            Underachieving Sr Bernardini (22% Deep | 44% eFG)
            Exceeding Expectation Fr Cartwright (56% eFG | 43% Deep)

            Overall, Penn has played the most difficult of all Ivy Schedules
            & Deliberate, Disciplined Offense keeps Penn in Gms
            When they put forth a Top-Effort

            "BIG-5" Gm fits this description
            LaSalle is playing quite poorly
            2-5 ATS & 1-7 S-U Last-8
            & Reeling a bit from Roller-Coaster situation
            w/Key Leader & Leader of Explorers' in 7 of 16 Categories
            Aaric Murray's Off-On-Off again suspension this week
            Looks like Murray will be playing
            Yet, it's been a big distraction for LaSalle

            Moreover, Murray definitely gives LaSalle size edge here
            Though Penn Backcourt remains the Quakers key

            Penn proficiency is seen from behind the Arch
            From the methodical (lowest 15% Pace)
            Penn's Double-Post Weave Inside out spot up 3's
            Are Providing nearly HALF of Penn Pts
            & LaSalle has been abnormally weak defending the perimeter

            PENN STARTERS (PLAY ALL BUT 13% MIN/GMS)
            HAVE HIT 24, 17, 16 & 14 THREES
            Seems Low#
            Yet PENN'S PLAYED JUST 3 GMS L-38 DAYS

            NINE DAYS to get ready for LaSalle
            Penn very high effort in Big Gms

            BIG-5 Classic is the BIGGEST thing going for Penn Quakers
            Love Penn gaining MORE than 2 Possessions
            Comment
            Search
            Collapse
            SBR Contests
            Collapse
            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
            Collapse
            Working...