ESPN game. Now way this will be a blowout, they have to keep people interested. It's the Blazers and Warriors FFS. Watch GS make a run soon. Just waiting for bookies to up the line when Jamal makes the 3 FTs
-
-
no one was even interested before this game started. i wouldn't put too much stock into thisComment -
Got +11.5. Let's cash this.Comment -
Nah no big plays on scrub teams like that don't worry. It's just my 2 cents on the game, and I just don't want to regret it.Comment -
well looks like i may have been wrong!Comment -
We're talking about the Warriors, they could still easily fukk this up. I may middle with Blazers live now.
I got -3.5, that would give me an 8 points middle...Comment -
This game is a joke
So obvious the Blazers are just letting them back in it. And now both teams trading baskets for fun.Comment -
Just took Blazers-3 live. As long as they win by 4-11, I'm cool. I think they win by 5 or 6... Even by 3 would be ok, push 1 and win the other.Comment -
Both should cash as long as nothing ridiculous happens.Comment -
Obvious point shaving on that 2H spread. I feel sorry for GS backers.
Cash both bets
Comment -
Warriors down 6 and foul with 2.6 to go lol.Comment -
nice workComment -
Yeah obvious point shaving there. Gotta love live betting.Originally posted by BernardMadoffComment -
nice middle
Comment -
ThanksOriginally posted by blanco
Comment -
Originally posted by dilojanjnice middle
Comment -
The line closed at Portland -4.5 and never got lower than -3.5. Care to explain how that was points shaving when they covered the spread?Originally posted by Seto
Nice middle though, good work.Comment -
2H Spread, Blazers up by 7 and line was Blazers-0.5Originally posted by MatIComment -
Portland also covered the 2H spread by 0.5 pt.Originally posted by SetoComment -
Yes, which makes me wonder why the hell the Warriors would foul down 6 with 2.6 to go. Maybe I'm expressing it wrong with the words "point shaving", but I mean the Warriors had no business fouling there and did just so Portland would cover the 2H spread.Originally posted by MatIComment -
Damn are these players checking lines on their Blackberry's @ the half?Comment -
If they wanted Portland to cover then why did they go on a 10-0 run at the beginning of the 4th qtr? It would have been easier to fix the spread if they didn't do that.Originally posted by Seto
Teams foul late in the majority of games, weather they are down by 6, 12 or 1 point.Comment -
Don't know, but they do know the lines we're sure of that now. Countless examples, for example that Kenyon 3 against the Kings just days ago that fukked Kings 2H for quite a few people. Nothing would surprise me at this rate.Originally posted by kgindyComment -
Oh dear.Originally posted by Seto
Like i said, nice middle.Comment -
Don't know. Maybe they wanted to try and win the game or make it entertaining and when they saw they couldn't iwn they decided not to cover the 2H spread. You'll also ask why they took that 3 with the Blazers up 9 if they wanted them to cover the 2H. I don't know anymore. That last bit did seem shady thoughOriginally posted by MatIComment -
Yeah, thanks. I do still think that foul was BS and I do feel sorry for GS 2H backersOriginally posted by MatIComment -
Never heard that one before.Originally posted by Seto
They tried to win the game, worked out they couldn't, so decided to throw the 2h line? You got to be joking right?
Whoever they were fixing the 2H line for would be mighty pissed off if they just decided to win the game instead of let Portland cover the 2H spread. If games actually played out as you describe, Basketball players wouldnt have any kneecaps left.Comment -
Originally posted by SetoOriginally posted by MatI
Right, that's what Seto was saying.[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]Comment -
Originally posted by yisman
Not sure if you just read the last couple of posts or actually read the discussion but I was responding to Seto calling it 'obvious point shaving'.
Correct me if i'm wrong but I was always of the impression that the term point shaving refers to a team deliberately not covering a spread. Considering Portland covered both the full game spread and 2H spread, the comment 'obvious point shaving' seems a little off IMO, which is what i was pointing out.
Seto then clarified he meant that GSW seemed to be letting Portland cover the spread. GL to him if that's what he thinks, but not sure why they would go on a 10-0 run at the beginning of the 4th and then leave it to a foul with 2.6 to go.
That is not the best way to let the fave cover and if I had paid GSW to let the spread cover I would be one pissed off man.
Look at tonights Pistons/Bobcats game. Pistons are covering the spread at the moment by 20 plus pts. Now THAT is how you throw a game.Comment -
just didn't understand why you were repeating him[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]Comment
