no one on the nets??
-
Comment -
"Dude", thanks for your reply, however I *do* know how a labby usually works; my question was directed to JW Cash because he runs a modified version of the labby, on two lines, for these John Morrison bets; he describes how he does it a few posts back if you are interested. However, he doesn't really say what he does if he finds himself in the situation I asked about. I have an idea what he probably does, but I was hoping to hear it straight from him.
JW Cash... any insight on what you do when you find yourself with a labby situation like:
X - 5 - 5 - X
5 - 5 - 5 - 5
on a B bet, you lose the B bet and need to split your losses between the top and bottom lines... do you leave the top line with two numbers or do you distribute it as 4 numbers? (my post asking the original question a few posts back gives a better example)
Thanks! :-)
-SilkBCComment -
It took me 4 extra days, but I got my win with Memphis. The (-110) system on betting dogs, still has only 4 losses, same as JM buying points system. Difference is, my 4 losses cost me less than 1/2 as much. Dallas tonight lost both ways, Go Nets +6.Comment -
memphis worked out. no points. nice.Comment -
Lets go Clippers! C bet woooComment -
Insane 44pts 1st qrt for the clippers!Comment -
Already proof in the past to why you should buy points. This year is an exception so far, but dont say we didn't warn you down the road. I believe Wilba shared all the statistics, but hopefully it works out for you the rest of the season.
You could probably do a 6 game chase with out buying points and cover... kinda like labby.Comment -
nets through away a 21pt lead wtfComment -
What is JM's rule when it is a push? I had the nets at +9 and they lost by nine. Do I play them against LA on friday?Comment -
Finally the NJ Net were a draw? I bought 3 points and I went to +9 in pinnacle. And they lost from Phoenix with a 118 - 109. Do I have to consider it as a draw and go to the b bet or pass byComment -
nets suck smh why did that bum vuacic or however u spell his name foul nash when it was no point???!!! those two free points was for no reason!Comment -
john will probably count it as a win for him. some people continue and some people dont.Comment -
guys please bet Nets the next game...they will definately cover the next game...bet them and winComment -
Hey silkbc....
According to your example....if the B Bet lost....
I would distribute 50% of the loss on Line 1 and leave 50% on
Line B....
And I would use ALL 4 number variables.....
Now if I played an A Bet and it won,,,,, Line 1 would look like
x-5-5-x
I would leave the line alone and play the next A Bet on it
If THAT A Bet would win...the line would look like
x-x-x-x
So you would start it again at
5-5-5-5
Or increase it if you hit your profit target...
But when I have to re-distribute a loss....I do use
all 4 numbers...
Hope this helps....Comment -
That's good stuffComment -
I am thinking I ' ll bet the Nets for the B bet. Their next game is @ LA against LAKERS. But if the bookers give a good spread I think The Nets will cover. I also think that the Nets are A GOOD TEAM (I am LAKERS' fun ) and when a good team loses such a stupid way then their proud will be hurt. And I think they' ll chase the game with LAKERS.Comment -
Can you post the JM's Games for today, and the points to take on each gamesComment -
Thanks for your timeComment -
God I love playing -110 odds with this system
Nets WILL be a play for me next game.Comment -
I can confirm the 'official' play is a C bet. Sac looking incredibly attractive to me tonight, I'm gonna play them hard. I've watched a couple of their recent games, esp vs Denver, and I believe they are a lot better than their W/L record would suggest.
This one is as close to a
as any bet ever is IMO.
NHL crusher play also.
GL today everyone, lets make some cha ching!
Sorry but the moment you put the symbol up you cruse the play. Denver and Boston are on two different levels. Sac to me was scary since they had covered two straight on the road. Playing them was actually going against the reverse JM play on a C bet.
Comment -
Why would Dallas be a B bet when Dirk was out? Doens't that nullify the series?Comment -
Yeh, especially the injury filter or any filter for that matter.Comment -
JM's NBA system:
01/12/2011 New Jersey @ Phoenix - V1, A bet - PUSH
01/12/2011 Dallas @ Indiana - V3, A bet - LOSS
V1record so far (finished series): 25-2
(A): 10-17
(B): 12-5
(C): 3-2
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
V2 record so far (finished series): 15-1
(A): 11-5
(B): 2-3
(C): 2-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 30-1
(A): 15-16
(B): 13-3
(C): 2-1
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
Next JM's plays:
01/14/2011 New Jersey @ L.A. Lakers - V1, B bet
01/14/2011 Dallas @ San Antonio - V3, B bet
01/15/2011 Toronto @ Washington - V2, A betComment -
Wallco99
If you private message dvb02 in this thread ( he is the originator of this thread) ++ I am sure he will explain how to attach your spreadsheets. Are you Following solaman's 1st or 2nd half plays. I hope you are.Comment -
crusher Purdue (ncaa) -3 [b]
sbp min -3.5 [c]Comment -
fcking chasers
Comment -
/\/\/\/\/\ WHAT A LOSER! man some people are dumbComment -
yeah I did my best to warn him but, some people can't be told.
If a 5 year backtest showing a huge unit differential between the two methods isn't enough proof, I don't know what is. Oh well, long term he will get burnt, and like you said we did our best to warn him + provided stats proving why it doesn't work. The points only need to matter in 4/100 series for buying the points to be more profitable so for there to be 40-60 or so series where it didn't matter is not unusual at all..
Hope your luck holds up for a little longerComment
