I read so many people on here saying that the spurs are so old, they're too old, blah blah blah. The spurs are not nearly as old as everyone thinks. Dallas, Phoenix, Denver, Boston, Cleveland, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Orlando and the Lakers are all older than the Spurs if you go by average age of their roster. Of the remaining playoff teams only Utah and OKC are younger than the spurs. So first I thought the spurs must have a bunch of young guys who never play bringing their average down. Somewhat yes but I think most teams have young guys at the end of their bench. The Spurs have about 8 guys in their rotation.
Duncan-34
Mcdyess-35
Ginobili-32
Parker-27
Hill-23
Jefferson-29
Bonner-30
Blair-21
And if you wanna count Bogans and Mason both of them are only 29. I don't have time to look up every team but go ahead and look for yourself if you want. With the addition of Hill and Blair playing significant minutes the Spurs are just fine. Is Duncan old? Sure he is but go look at the Mavs roster. They only have one guy under 30 who plays significant minutes. Look at the Lakers. Kobe, Artest, Odom, Fisher are all 30 or older and Gasol is 29.
Duncan-34
Mcdyess-35
Ginobili-32
Parker-27
Hill-23
Jefferson-29
Bonner-30
Blair-21
And if you wanna count Bogans and Mason both of them are only 29. I don't have time to look up every team but go ahead and look for yourself if you want. With the addition of Hill and Blair playing significant minutes the Spurs are just fine. Is Duncan old? Sure he is but go look at the Mavs roster. They only have one guy under 30 who plays significant minutes. Look at the Lakers. Kobe, Artest, Odom, Fisher are all 30 or older and Gasol is 29.