jazz -2.5 spurs 190

leo · 05-26-07, 12:15 PM

I think so AC.And like Spurs ml, too...

GL to you all...

capitalist pig · 05-26-07, 12:24 PM

spurs +2.5
over 190

later

mobu · 05-26-07, 01:20 PM

5/22/07 SA 105 - UTA 96 O 188
5/20/07 SA 108 - UTA 100 O 186.5
3/30/07 SA 102 - UTA 93 O 185
1/31/07 UTA 97 - SA 93 UTA O 188.5
12/28/06 SA 106 - UTA 83

under 190? really? i know this they're down 2-0, and they need to stop the spurs, but they were getting it done from the perimeter. so i mean, under 190, really?

rjt721 · 05-26-07, 01:30 PM

Jazz -2

onlooker · 05-26-07, 04:14 PM

I would have to ride the Jazz at home. I think they make their playoff home record 7-0 after tonight.

LargeMouthBass · 05-26-07, 04:21 PM

Couple days ago, I was very confident with Utah -2 and the over... Today, I'm going complete opposite with SA +2.5 and the under. My reasoning is Utah and the over seem too easy... The books definitely want you to bet Utah and the over. I might be over ananlyzing this game but we'll see what happens. GL to all

LargeMouthBass · 05-26-07, 05:04 PM

I guess I was wrong, 52% on SA and 48% on Utah... I guess I'll stick with my original lean and go with Utah.

onlooker · 05-26-07, 05:05 PM

Man, a lot of double guessing going on there LMB. I hope your original lean is the right one.

LT Profits · 05-26-07, 05:23 PM

I am passing on the side tonight. but I do like the OVER. I am not buying into the "change of venue, change of tempo" crap, as I again expect to see a lot of late free throws with the game undecided.

pavyracer · 05-26-07, 05:57 PM

Utah wins big tonight. Period!

zootiehead · 05-26-07, 06:00 PM

Only Jazz win happens here tonight.

mobu · 05-26-07, 06:04 PM

somewhere OVER the rainbow... and spurs +2.5

AC1318 · 05-26-07, 06:51 PM

Originally posted by mobu

5/22/07 SA 105 - UTA 96 O 188
5/20/07 SA 108 - UTA 100 O 186.5
3/30/07 SA 102 - UTA 93 O 185
1/31/07 UTA 97 - SA 93 UTA O 188.5
12/28/06 SA 106 - UTA 83

under 190? really? i know this they're down 2-0, and they need to stop the spurs, but they were getting it done from the perimeter. so i mean, under 190, really?

All the games that went over were in SA, The total has not gone over 190 more than 3 times out of 20 games in UTAH. The game could go over but I don't think it will, someone has to lose either on over or under. It may be me or it might be you, good luck all.

AC1318 · 05-26-07, 06:53 PM

don't forget jazz have defense too.

LargeMouthBass · 05-26-07, 07:12 PM

Originally posted by onlòóker

Man, a lot of double guessing going on there LMB. I hope your original lean is the right one.

Yeah, I just wanna fade the public for this game in particular. I really thought the public would be on Utah but I am quite surprised to see otherwise. Final bet is Utah -2 and Under 190 GL to everyone.

AC1318 · 05-26-07, 10:10 PM

got fvcked on the under

those who bet over congrats you made it by a cunt hair.

AC1318 · 05-26-07, 10:15 PM

Originally posted by mobu

somewhere OVER the rainbow... and spurs +2.5

2 bad calls one lucky win

mobu · 05-27-07, 12:11 AM

sorry, what? huh? hmm?

mobu · 05-27-07, 12:13 AM

just kidding man, sorry you didn't get yours.

LargeMouthBass · 05-27-07, 12:20 AM

Lesson learned, always stick with your original answers... In this case, your original leans. Damn, why couldn't the game be yesterday.

LT Profits · 05-27-07, 05:18 AM

Originally posted by AC1318

2 bad calls one lucky win

AC,

The OVER was not "lucky", as it was obviously the right call here. This game was at 187 when the benches were cleared with a little under 4:00 left, and the scrubs proceded to brick shots and miss layups and free throws left and right, scoring a total of five points in the last 3:30 or so!

isetcap · 05-27-07, 03:43 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

AC,

The OVER was not "lucky", as it was obviously the right call here. This game was at 187 when the benches were cleared with a little under 4:00 left, and the scrubs proceded to brick shots and miss layups and free throws left and right, scoring a total of five points in the last 3:30 or so!

If it hadn't gone OVER, it would have been one of the most amazing bad beats of all time. Three layups missed and 5 missed free throws out of 6 attempts until Brickmaster Araujo made 2 to seal it.

AC1318 · 05-27-07, 06:35 PM

To me an over game is one that sails over the total

at halftime there was 90 points

double that makes 180 so by half the game was still on course for the under

by the 3rd 142 less 190 leaves 48 which is a lot for these two teams against each other, I still feel the game was a lucky over had the benches not been cleared there would have been more defense and no scoring.

again congrats to the winners but you were lucky not to mention the wrong side do the math.

isetcap · 05-27-07, 06:54 PM

Originally posted by AC1318

To me an over game is one that sails over the total

at halftime there was 90 points

double that makes 180 so by half the game was still on course for the under

by the 3rd 142 less 190 leaves 48 which is a lot for these two teams against each other, I still feel the game was a lucky over had the benches not been cleared there would have been more defense and no scoring.

again congrats to the winners but you were lucky not to mention the wrong side do the math.

Yes, you have made it perfectly obvious that you know what you are talking about. Well done!

AC1318 · 05-27-07, 07:08 PM

Originally posted by isetcap

Yes, you have made it perfectly obvious that you know what you are talking about. Well done!

NO, I am sure you know what your talking about
you must be kidding

05/26/2007 UTA 109 SAN 83 W -2 W 190½ O
01/31/2007 UTA 97 SAN 93 W 5 W 189 O
11/29/2006 UTA 83 SAN 75 W 1 W 190½ U
04/04/2006 UTA 86 SAN 95 L 4½ L 184 U
01/30/2006 UTA 70 SAN 79 L 6 L 178 U
04/13/2005 UTA 93 SAN 91 W 8 W 182 O
01/10/2005 UTA 97 SAN 96 W 10 W 180½ O
04/02/2004 UTA 81 SAN 94 L 5½ L 167½ O
02/02/2004 UTA 65 SAN 83 L 4½ L 169 U
04/14/2003 UTA 83 SAN 91 L 2 L 185 U
01/24/2003 UTA 90 SAN 91 L -4 L 183 U
04/17/2002 UTA 84 SAN 86 L 3½ W 184½ U
01/23/2002 UTA 92 SAN 98 L -1 L 186½ O
01/27/2001 UTA 86 SAN 99 L -4½ L 181 O
12/11/2000 UTA 83 SAN 91 L -4½ L 178 U
02/06/2000 UTA 93 SAN 90 W -2½ W 179½ O
11/15/1999 UTA 91 SAN 85 W 2 W 178 U
04/20/1999 UTA 69 SAN 83 L -4½ L 175 U
05/12/1998 UTA 87 SAN 77 W -5 W 177 U
05/07/1998 UTA 109 SAN 106 W -5 L 178 O

AC1318 · 05-27-07, 07:14 PM

Any and all lopsided wins have all stayed under a total of 190

AC1318 · 05-27-07, 07:29 PM

Originally posted by isetcap

Yes, you have made it perfectly obvious that you know what you are talking about. Well done!

I don't need to know what I am talking about I normally post winners check the back log my plays speak for themselves, but I will say it again over bettors were lucky to win.

isetcap · 05-27-07, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by AC1318

I don't need to know what I am talking about I normally post winners check the back log my plays speak for themselves, but I will say it again over bettors were lucky to win.

Yep. They were lucky. It's all in the math.

It's good that you don't need to know what you're talking about, because I sure as hell don't know what you're talking about either.

mobu · 05-27-07, 10:20 PM

Originally posted by AC1318

To me an over game is one that sails over the total

at halftime there was 90 points

double that makes 180 so by half the game was still on course for the under

in an nba game, if one team has 75 points at halftime, which has happened, would you really say they are more than likely to finish with 150 points? scratch that, at any level of basketball other than high school - no. that is a poor way to consider and evaluate how points per quarter and per half will carry out. look at the numbers, ball don't lie.

Gorzy · 05-27-07, 11:18 PM

Today easy money is............

Utah Jazz Money Line

and Over 190

I´s done

AC1318 · 05-28-07, 12:03 AM

Originally posted by mobu

in an nba game, if one team has 75 points at halftime, which has happened, would you really say they are more than likely to finish with 150 points? scratch that, at any level of basketball other than high school - no. that is a poor way to consider and evaluate how points per quarter and per half will carry out. look at the numbers, ball don't lie.

asshole I mean mobu I would say they might finish with 130

but if a team is below the projected total why wouldn't you think the team would continue playing at that level or below. your asshole analogy states the team would be able to apply the same consistency throughout a game, I would think they fall off in the second half a bit.

BUT SEE IN YOUR STATEMENT YOU WOULD THINK THE TEAM SCORES LESS IN THE SECOND HALF AS WELL (if one team has 75 points at halftime, which has happened, would you really say they are more than likely to finish with 150 points?) WHICH IS EXACTLY MY POINT AND SINCE THE TOTAL SCORE 90 WAS BELOW HALF OF 190 I WAS LOOKING BETTER THAN IF THE HALFTIME SCORE EXCEEDED 95 POINTS

So if you or the other :dick: istecap bet a total at 200 but at the half the total is 90 that wouldn't put you below par, now if the same game at half is 110 you wouldn't be a little concerned since the teams over exceeded more than half the points you can give up in the same amount of time they still have left to play.

Was over the right side in tonights game as well???

AC1318 · 05-28-07, 12:11 AM

Originally posted by isetcap

Yep. They were lucky. It's all in the math.

It's good that you don't need to know what you're talking about, because I sure as hell don't know what you're talking about either.

You must do that a lot with people try to switch words around to make yourself sound right or add some together to make them sound wrong.

All over bettors for that game were lucky

just like all spurs backers in game one were lucky that the last shot didn't count.

The pace of the game and simple addition by quarters shows were the game is heading. And that was an under game, last quarter heroics from pine riders I guess you took that into consideration when placing the bet.

mobu · 05-28-07, 12:28 AM

listen flag, you lost your bet, plain and simple, which means you are a loser, by technicality. i don't think i said anywhere that teams would score less in the second half, i just said scores would not completely mirror the scores of the first half. now, i hope you don't bust a nut/have to icepack your ovaries, but the over bettors may have been lucky, but we were right, and you were wrong. enough said - and i took the under tonight. it's pretty simple. you couldn't pick your nose if you tried asshole, i mean ac1318.

AC1318 · 05-28-07, 12:46 AM

Originally posted by mobu

listen flag, you lost your bet, plain and simple, which means you are a loser, by technicality. i don't think i said anywhere that teams would score less in the second half, i just said scores would not completely mirror the scores of the first half. now, i hope you don't bust a nut/have to icepack your ovaries, but the over bettors may have been lucky, but we were right, and you were wrong. enough said - and i took the under tonight. it's pretty simple. you couldn't pick your nose if you tried asshole, i mean ac1318.

well at least you admit you were lucky, go fvck yourself and have a good night anytime you like to match nightly selections and we can see who picks their ass.

what's a flag???

you follow hockey ?, if so who you like tonight ?