Brooklyn vs. Indiana!

[heavypenguin]

Which is the best pick here... Brooklyn +6 or Indiana -6 and why?

[vasilli07]

A meaningless game. I will lean Pacers as I think they want gather some momentum going into the playoffs.

[Sport_Fish]

It's a guessing game as to which team actually wants to win this game - both teams are secured in their seeds so no real motivation.

Pacers are probably the play based on just the line, but probably best to avoid.

[PorkChop]

People just keep underrating the Nets. Gonna ride them to a W once again.

[heavypenguin]

Indiana-6 is the play!

[LT Profits]

A meaningless game.

both teams are secured in their seeds so no real motivation.

Not true, Pacers need to win to clinch 3 seed (with miniscule chance at 2 but doubtful). If Pacers lose, they could still drop to 4-seed, lead over Nets would be two games will three to play but Nets would own 4-0 season sweep.

[vasilli07]

Not true, Pacers need to win to clinch 3 seed (with miniscule chance at 2 but doubtful). If Pacers lose, they could still drop to 4-seed, lead over Nets would be two games will three to play but Nets would own 4-0 season sweep.

Pacers will have to lose all their remaining games while Nets need to win all games. Yes, certainly possible but a very very low chance.

And division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders.

http://thebrooklyngame.com/brooklyn-nets-playoff-matchup-scenarios/

[lucasdawg]

Not true, Pacers need to win to clinch 3 seed (with miniscule chance at 2 but doubtful). If Pacers lose, they could still drop to 4-seed, lead over Nets would be two games will three to play but Nets would own 4-0 season sweep.

so a good play on pacers?

[LT Profits]

And division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders.

THAT I never knew! I knew that division winners are guaranteed a top 4 seed, but I always thought that the one non-division winner in the top 4 would be treated equal in regards to tiebreakers.

[Brebos]

nets nets net, nothing but nets

[LT Profits]

Pacers will have to lose all their remaining games while Nets need to win all games. Yes, certainly possible but a very very low chance.

And division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders.

http://thebrooklyngame.com/brooklyn-...hup-scenarios/

Ironically though if the Pacers and the Nets were to face each other in the playoffs later, I think the Nets would have homecourt advantage in the event of a tie. Division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders in regards to seeding, but the team with the better record always has the homecourt advantage regardless of seeding and I think they use same tiebreakers across the board there.

[J_On_A_Roll]

A meaningless game. I will lean Pacers as I think they want gather some momentum going into the playoffs.

Only thing I can see.

[PorkChop]

Boys this game is not meaningless. Both teams are playing starters and have seedings to play for. No resting starters here

Also updated *Gerald Wallace is out for Nets with injury

[Brebos]

Boys this game is not meaningless. Both teams are playing starters and have seedings to play for. No resting starters here

Also updated *Gerald Wallace is out for Nets with injury

alica keys ass and tiddies look faptastic