You keep taking the magic to go under.???? You know they suck on defense, you go out of your way to point it out then you constantly take the magic under and you lose.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#3
Originally posted by RJKing
You keep taking the magic to go under.???? You know they suck on defense, you go out of your way to point it out then you constantly take the magic under and you lose.
Are you going to keep pointing that out every time I take an Orlando Under? Take a look at the last two weeks or so, Magic are trending toward an 'under' team because they can't score but they have actually played better defense since playing all the youngsters. And I think I cashed a Magic Under or two during that time (Spurs game comes to mind, may have been more).
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#4
Originally posted by RJKing
You keep taking the magic to go under.???? You know they suck on defense, you go out of your way to point it out then you constantly take the magic under and you lose.
I am 2-1 with Orlando 'unders' since Alfalo was lost for the season, won vs. Spurs and Thunder, lost vs. Heat.
Comment
Sport_Fish
SBR MVP
12-06-10
4079
#5
u went from -16 units down to now -8....do we start fading you now?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#6
I am actually considering adding Magic side. Bucks may limit starters in second of back-to-back, they know they won't catch Boston for 7th.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#7
Originally posted by Sport_Fish
u went from -16 units down to now -8....do we start fading you now?
More likely to approach 0, winning season still very possible. Remember 4 winning NBA seasons out of 5 at SBR (26 of 37 all sports)
Comment
Sport_Fish
SBR MVP
12-06-10
4079
#8
Originally posted by LT Profits
More likely to approach 0, winning season still very possible. Remember 4 winning NBA seasons out of 5 at SBR (26 of 37 all sports)
possible...but its just been a trend a few times i've noticed. Go up, then go down. etc.
Oh well lets wait n see
And 4 of 5 winning seasons? So that means by theory you will have 1 winning season out of ur next 5 (50%)...this could be variance kicking in and this year will likely be one of those losing ones?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#9
Originally posted by Sport_Fish
possible...but its just been a trend a few times i've noticed. Go up, then go down. etc.
Oh well lets wait n see
And 4 of 5 winning seasons? So that means by theory you will have 1 winning season out of ur next 5 (50%)...this could be variance kicking in and this year will likely be one of those losing ones?
Gamblers fallacy, regression takes place over infinity, if it were as easy as looking at drop-in-the-bucket periods like 5-year intervals, we would all be rich. That aside, I don't consider myself a 50-50 or coin-flip capper, as 26-of-37 it a truer representation than 4-of-5 NBA or the 0-for-3 so far on current sports. Let's just see how everything plays out.
Under screwed by OT in Orlando. Now need Magic to cover.
Comment
kobstopa
SBR MVP
02-21-11
2965
#12
Bucks/magics go OT, the magics could have iced the game with a free threw at end of regulation. But he missed it
Comment
El Sol
SBR Wise Guy
05-17-08
876
#13
Originally posted by LT Profits
Gamblers fallacy, regression takes place over infinity, if it were as easy as looking at drop-in-the-bucket periods like 5-year intervals, we would all be rich. That aside, I don't consider myself a 50-50 or coin-flip capper, as 26-of-37 it a truer representation than 4-of-5 NBA or the 0-for-3 so far on current sports. Let's just see how everything plays out.
Very few people here fully understand what the term 'gamblers fallacy' actually means. I tried to explain this to many gamblers including veterans and they still insist that random events in the past effect random events in the future...
Comment
Bman1991
SBR Rookie
09-11-12
34
#14
Originally posted by LT Profits
Under screwed by OT in Orlando. Now need Magic to cover.
Tobias Harris is a cheater, he shouldn't have shot the three.
Comment
ThaTopMoron
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
04-30-10
27020
#15
Originally posted by LT Profits
1 NBA Play Wednesday
Bucks / Magic UNDER 201 -110 (Bookmaker)
YTD: 190-198-2, -8.20
Bucks / Magic UNDER 201...
another under busted in the NBA, jeez LT.... what did I tell you?
Under 191.5 in Boston... YOU JUST LOST IT WITH 8 SECONDS LEFT WITH A MEANINGLESS 3 IN THE CORNER THAT THE NETS DIDN'T EVEN CONTEST....
what did I tell you about late season unders?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#16
Originally posted by ThaTopMoron
Bucks / Magic UNDER 201...
another under busted in the NBA, jeez LT.... what did I tell you?
Under 191.5 in Boston... YOU JUST LOST IT WITH 8 SECONDS LEFT WITH A MEANINGLESS 3 IN THE CORNER THAT THE NETS DIDN'T EVEN CONTEST....
what did I tell you about late season unders?
Meh, I could have easily been 3-0 tonight, shit happens. And you are wrong about late season Unders. Since 2007, the Under is 50.9 percent in all regular season games. In APRIL regular season games during that time, it is 52.2 percent.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#17
By the way, 'under' is 54.1 percent in playoffs since 2008 (actually 2007-08 season).