Is this method of capping nonsense?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brumbies
    SBR MVP
    • 02-21-09
    • 1489

    #1
    Is this method of capping nonsense?
    I came across a tout's writeup which was something like this:

    Say the total is 200 and Team A(home team) is playing Team B. You look at all the games Team A has played and saw that only 2 out of 40 games had gone over 200. Out of 20 home games played by Team A, only one had gone over 200. Do the same for Team B and you saw that only 4 out of 40 games had gone over 200. Out of 20 road games played by Team A, only two had gone over 200.

    So you play the under 200.

    I am pretty sure this is a nonsense way to cap, just like trends. Anyone agree with me? What's bizarre is that this tout has a ytd record of 34-13 using this style of 'capping'. I know, small sample size but still..
  • YorkHunt
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 12-11-10
    • 7496

    #2
    Not extremely nonsense...theres a lot more to it than that.
    Comment
    • jgilmartin
      SBR MVP
      • 03-31-09
      • 1119

      #3
      Originally posted by brumbies
      I am pretty sure this is a nonsense way to cap, just like trends. Anyone agree with me?
      Yes
      Comment
      • Data
        SBR MVP
        • 11-27-07
        • 2236

        #4
        Originally posted by brumbies
        I came across a tout's writeup which was something like this:

        Say the total is 200 and Team A(home team) is playing Team B. You look at all the games Team A has played and saw that only 2 out of 40 games had gone over 200. Out of 20 home games played by Team A, only one had gone over 200. Do the same for Team B and you saw that only 4 out of 40 games had gone over 200. Out of 20 road games played by Team A, only two had gone over 200.

        So you play the under 200.

        I am pretty sure this is a nonsense way to cap, just like trends. Anyone agree with me? What's bizarre is that this tout has a ytd record of 34-13 using this style of 'capping'. I know, small sample size but still..
        The closer 200 to the league's average total, the more this makes sense, and vice versa.
        Comment
        • Stocks
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 11-01-10
          • 569

          #5
          Write ups are garbage usually whats in the write up is not why they made the pick.
          Comment
          • Pokerjoe
            SBR Wise Guy
            • 04-17-09
            • 704

            #6
            It's hard to imagine why the total would be 200 between the two teams hypothesized here, but it if is, there's a reason.
            Comment
            • That Foreign Guy
              SBR Sharp
              • 07-18-10
              • 432

              #7
              One assumes in this specific example the rest of the teams in the league play at a significantly slower tempo than A and B?

              More generally Data's advice seems right.
              Comment
              SBR Contests
              Collapse
              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
              Collapse
              Working...