So basically I was wondering about what people thought when it comes to laying points in a spread situation at 3 or under and when it is right to moneyline. In terms of betting the favorite I am more apt to just lay the points. On the other side, I like taking moneyline value from 3 points or less but am curious what other bettors think.
Moneylines versus laying/taking points in football
Collapse
X
-
steady hustlinSBR Wise Guy
- 05-24-07
- 687
#1Moneylines versus laying/taking points in footballTags: None -
IrishTimSBR Wise Guy
- 07-23-09
- 983
#2Get acquainted with your new buddy:Comment -
20Four7SBR Hall of Famer
- 04-08-07
- 6703
#3There are lots of money line bets that are plus EV. You just have to be prepared to lose a lot before you win. ANytime I think I dog can win AKA denver, I will take the money line if it's offering value. You have to determine if it's offering value. If a team is offering you +400 and it's a 30% chance to win is it offering you value? You have to know.
BTW if your answer is no I want to be your bookie.Comment -
Desert TortoiseSBR Rookie
- 11-15-09
- 14
#4In the NFL sports books tend to set the payout at the true odds for the underdog and take all the vig on the favorite. For example a 3 point road underdog wins outright about 40% of the time/+150. Most casinos will have the moneyline for a 3 point spread at about +150/-170.
In short usually it's better to bet the moneyline on the underdog and the spread on the favorite.Comment -
yismanSBR Aristocracy
- 09-01-08
- 75682
#5^ I agree, especially when you're dealing with spreads of under 3.[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]Comment -
BigdaddyQHSBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-09
- 19530
#6It is a risk to reward ratio. If 40% of the teams wo are +3 win outright, and you get 3/2 (+150) on the ML, that equates to 50%. That could be a good risk to reward situation. Most "high rollers" and "wiseguys" that I know will always take the ML is they are going to back the dogs and the line is less than 3. 3 seems to be the dividing line. I also know that we have "middled" lines by taking favorites minus very low points or a pick and then grabbing the dog at the ML. You will ot win a lot, but you can manipulate yourself into a "can't lose" situation. This is especially true if the line is going to swing from, say team A to team B. We did it once this year. Grabbed Oregon on a future at +1 vs UCLA, and then took UCLA ML when Oregon balloned to -6.Comment -
MonkeyF0ckerSBR Posting Legend
- 06-12-07
- 12144
#7A lot of bad advice in this thread. If it offers value, you bet it. Pretty simple. Every team has a chance to win.Comment -
20Four7SBR Hall of Famer
- 04-08-07
- 6703
#8Originally posted by MonkeyF0ckerA lot of bad advice in this thread. If it offers value, you bet it. Pretty simple. Every team has a chance to win.Comment -
RickySteveRestricted User
- 01-31-06
- 3415
#9Originally posted by Desert TortoiseIn the NFL sports books tend to set the payout at the true odds for the underdog and take all the vig on the favorite. For example a 3 point road underdog wins outright about 40% of the time/+150. Most casinos will have the moneyline for a 3 point spread at about +150/-170.
In short usually it's better to bet the moneyline on the underdog and the spread on the favorite.Comment -
20Four7SBR Hall of Famer
- 04-08-07
- 6703
#10Originally posted by RickySteveOr the opposite of this.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#11Originally posted by RickySteveOr the opposite of this.
Also, HOME NFL Dogs of +2.5 or less are actually over .500 STRAIGHT UP since 1985. I don't agree with him with games that are right on 3 though.Comment -
BET THE HOOKSBR MVP
- 02-16-09
- 1947
#12I parlay moneylines alot especially in tennis when I dont want to lay a ton of cash down.Comment -
TomGSBR Wise Guy
- 10-29-07
- 500
#13Remember that when an NFL spread is +2.5 the ML is usually around +120. If it was +2.5 +100 then I might consider the points. But notice the difference is usually between laying -110 on +2.5 and taking +120 on the ML. That's a huge 30c difference (also remember cents are not linear so you're getting 30c where they are most valuable). You instead are receiving odds instead of laying. That's huge over the long term. It also works in NBA for small dogs as well since fouling at the end of the game usually makes the difference between the ML and spread negligible.Comment -
warriorfan707SBR Posting Legend
- 03-29-08
- 13698
#14Theres no way to estimate what percentage a team has of winning like what one of the posters in this thread is saying.
If they are +400 and have a 30% chance of winning does it make it a good value bet? No!
Its a losing bet. The value doesn't mean crap if you torched your money.Comment -
yismanSBR Aristocracy
- 09-01-08
- 75682
#15Originally posted by warriorfan707
If they are +400 and have a 30% chance of winning does it make it a good value bet? No.[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]Comment -
StarPicksSBR Hustler
- 10-23-09
- 98
#16In NHl, I usually throw on the dogs the day after favorites all cover.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#17Originally posted by warriorfan707If they are +400 and have a 30% chance of winning does it make it a good value bet? No!Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code