big ten sucks ohio state hides and dont play anyone except shitty canes big ten is shit
-
Comment -
I like the plays, I just wonder if the Auburn game could cause Kentucky to have a let down. Sometimes you'll see a team come up short and then not show up the next week because they used up their intensity the week before.
Either way I certainly agree OSU and Carolina are bad plays as favorites. I like the idea of teasing on Kentucky and Wisconsin.Comment -
Firedawg, it's not the computers fault. The problem lies with me. The computer portion is strictly for generating the adjusted lines and that hasn't been the problem. The problem has been on my end capping the games that meet the required differential. The previous 2 seasons I would put 30 + up to 60 hours a week into capping and this year I just haven't. Not to say it requires that much time it's just what was working.Comment -
i don't think the bucks will lose to the national championshipComment -
Ohio state -4 @ Wisconsin. Something fishy.Comment -
OHST Wisconsin
43.2 PTS FOR 37.2
13.5 PTS AGNST 19.0
29.7 DIFF. 18.2
248.5 PASS YDS 209.3
217.3 RUSH YDS 240.8
158.3 PASS D 200.2
78.0 RUSH D 108.2
-1.7 TO DIFF -0.3
Ohio State is 5-0 SU in its last 5 games
The total has gone OVER in 4 of Ohio State's last 6 games
Ohio State is 6-1 SU in its last 7 games on the road
The total has gone UNDER in 5 of Ohio State's last 5 games on the road
Ohio State is 4-2 SU in its last 6 games when playing Wisconsin
The total has gone UNDER in 5 of Ohio State's last 7 games when playing Wisconsin
C.J. Barnett DB Out For Season (knee)
Donnie Evege DB Doubtful Week 6 (elbow)
Jake Stoneburner TE Questionable Week 6 (ankle)
Devon Torrence CB Questionable Week 6 (hip)
Wisconsin is 7-1 SU in its last 8 games
Wisconsin is 5-0 SU in its last 5 games at home
Wisconsin is 2-4 SU in its last 6 games when playing Ohio State
The total has gone UNDER in 5 of Wisconsin's last 7 games when playing Ohio State
C.J. Barnett DB Out For Season (knee)
Donnie Evege DB Doubtful Week 6 (elbow)
Jake Stoneburner TE Questionable Week 6 (ankle)
Devon Torrence CB Questionable Week 6 (hip)
You be the judge, I am not good at CFB.Comment -
As much as it pains me to say this as a loyal Gamecock, I could easily see them losing vs Kentucky. They'll spend all week, hearing how great they are from everyone on campus. They go up to Kentucky who woulda/coulda/shoulda beat Auburn last week. So, they'll be pretty pissed off.
UK has a mobile running QB (unlike Georgia or Alabama), but unfortunately, just like the Auburn QB that we had helluva time stoppping.
I'm not sure it's a "trap" game, but it is a game I could see the Gamecocks losing.
Don't be mislead by the Spurrier has never lost to UK or Carolina has won 11 in a row or whatever the hell it is, most of those games have been very competitive.
Doc "Nervous Gamecock Fan"Comment -
Do you think people that gamble would think about taking Ohio st. after the game @ Illinois? Illinois had a great chance of beating them at home, and Wisconsin is a far more superior team than them, and with a better home field advantage(camp randall will be rockin)
I was simply saying, thanks for going out on a limb and "alerting" us that Ohio st has a possibility of losing.Comment -
wow. nice bump.
clueless.
according to my "inside sources" 79 % is on Ohio St Moneyline. 75% on Wisconsin ML
wow.
Comment -
Camp Randall + Saturday night kickoff = UPSET! Badgers completely outplayed OSU at the Shoe last year, outgaining them by almost 200 yards. The problem was turnovers for scores. Avoid those and Bucky will join SCar as the giantkillers!Comment -
I like Wisconsin here also Rudy. Thanks for the info.Comment -
nice bump? you do realize the last post was last night and this game isn't until Saturday, right? It hasn't already happened or anything...and you come back at me with a made up stat after i prove you wrong yet again (3rd or 4th time in this thread) that most everyone is pounding OSU?
ngates i thought you were just being a prick to people like i use to and keyboarding does, but now i realize you really don't have a fukkin clue.
hey pal, this is a perfect game to tease.. you can go through 0
Comment -
Lol...I see you keep bringing up the teasing of the bobcats thru 0. Did you see me come in and bash you for picking the bobcats ML? No Because I didn't care that it lost, and I didn't care that I lost that teaser, If I bet it on ML, I would of lost also.
Yes I realize the game isn't til Saturday, but I bet if you didn't "bump" it this morning it would of found it's way down to the 3rd page. So yes nice bump, because it sure wasn't on the first page anymore. Ohh sorry it was on page 4 when you "bumped" it this morning. And yes I'd call that a bump.
Tell me where you have proved me wrong 3-4 times in this thread? I'd like to see.Comment -
how is the title not contradicting.
You say Ohio State MIGHT lose. But then according to your first post they MIGHT win also.
is that not opposites? the meaning of contradicting?
I skimmed the first post, so I was wrong for skimming and not reading?
3 solid answers for what i've been wrong about.Comment -
You forgot calling your post this morning a bump.
I don't know what it's called when you move a thread from the 4th page to the first page, so more people can notice a thread.Comment -
You really don't know much about college football do you. And for all you people that thinks Ohio St gets beat your crazy! They will be ready and they will win by 10 or more points. They seen what happened to Bama and believe me they won't let that happen to them.Comment -
OK, Just because I said it was the wrong word, was it really?
Your title is Ohio st might lose, first post clearly states that they might win also.
SO again tell me where I have been wrong?Comment -
But again, I am the clueless one here.
Explain to me why contradicting was the wrong word, I know you already did once, you said "contradicting mean opposite"
Last I checked the title did contradict what you say in the first post. So I'd like your explanation, or are you just going to avoid this, and post, why don't you tease thru 0 again.
lolComment -
Gates, are you that fukkin young that I need to draw 2 big circles that are connected by a small amount on a chalk board 1 representing ohio st losing and 1 for south carolina losing and for me to shade in the area of where ohio state might lose and might not, usc might lose and might not, they both might lose, but there is no chance of both of them both winning? please tell me you arent that stupid.
also, please review post 10 and 21 where i clearly fukkin pointed it out to you elementary schoolers along with numerous times in the other thread. everyone else seems to have grasped this concept except you.
Comment -
OK, back to the personal attacks when you want to avoid something.
You're whole thing here is how I'm a dumbass because I teased thru the 0 and because I questioned you about the name of the thread, saying it's contradicting to the first post.
I'd like for you to spell it out for me....How is the title and the first post NOT contradicting. It clearly says "ohio state might lose" in the title, then in the first post, it clearly states that OHIO STATE MIGHT WIN. I just called my high school English teacher, and she said that my argument is very good, and that the person arguing has not given me an answer to my question, because he/she is wrong, and will continue to avoid it
Now don't get me wrong, I know that you said 1 of the teams will lose. I don't need a drawing to show me that.Comment -
Gates I am not avoiding it. The fukkin answer to your question for atleast the 5th fukkin time in this thread alone is posted right above you and does not include teasing through 0
Gates, are you that fukkin young that I need to draw 2 big circles that are connected by a small amount on a chalk board 1 representing ohio st losing and 1 for south carolina losing and for me to shade in the area of where ohio state might lose and might not, usc might lose and might not, they both might lose, but there is no chance of both of them both winning? please tell me you arent that stupid.
also, please review post 10 and 21 where i clearly fukkin pointed it out to you elementary schoolers along with numerous times in the other thread. everyone else seems to have grasped this concept except you.
Gates: maybe you are bad at the math perspective involved. Lets look at 2 people going into a barber shop.
2 identical twins walk into the shop. You are standing outside and can see hair on the ground, so you know atleast 1 kid got a haircut. Ok so far pal?
So before they come out, the things you know for sure are:
1. Atleast 1 Person has definitely gotten a haircut
2. It is impossible to tell which or if both got a haircut
Therefore, you can conclude:
3. Person A might have gotten a haircut
4. person B might have gotten a haircutComment -
lol I get all of that. I get the point of the thread saying that Ohio st or south carolina will lose. For the 5th fuckkkkkkking time, what I don't understand is how you think that contradicting is the wrong word, and that's what you kept saying.
How is the title not contradicting to the first post?
The title does not even mention South Carolina, so if someone just read the Thread title, you'd think ok rudy thinks Ohio st might lose. But then they read the first post, and they would think, well now he is throwing another team in the mix, and now he thinks ohio st might WIN, and south carolina will lose then?
How do you not understand that, and that's what i've been saying all long. You keep telling me that I don't understand that 1 of those teams will lose, where I've already said that I realize that's what the thread is about, but according to the title it doesn't mention another team, so it's a little misleading?
Now do you understand any of that? or are you just gonna give me another example of how Ohio st or South carolina will lose? which for the 8th fukkkkkkking time, I already understand that 1 of them will lose.
It seems you don't have a clue.
So me and you are in the same boat.Comment -
Gates apparently you do not understand the concept and therefore need the examples.
If I said Ohio St will not lose and then said they will, that is contradicting pal. Contradicting = opposites.
In no way have I said play OSU and then said don't play OSU. I have said play Wisky the whole fukkin time because one of the two things will happen. Not quite sure how you can think anything is contradicting.
If at the time of posting, these lines were both +100 or worse, then it would be quite useless but never contradicting.Comment -
I've explained that I understand the concept. Ohio st or South Carolina will lose.
What you don't understand is that the title is Contradicting to the first post.
Title spells out - Ohio St might lose
But then the first post states that - Ohio st or USC Will lose...that would mean that Ohio St MIGHT win.
SO your title says for the 18th FUKKKKKKKKINGGGGGG time
Ohio st might lose.
Your first post gives off the idea that Ohio st might win
Does it not?Comment -
Jesus christ, it's not that hard to understand.Comment -
Then stop spamming my fukkin thread, stick to fightingwarrior where you atleast don't look like a fukkin kid.
Gates I'm tired of trying to explain a simple concept to you of how its supporting evidence not contradicting.
Your idea of thinking in this instance is like those 2+2 idiots who joke there is a 50/50 chance of KK beating AA because it will either happen or it won't. 1 out of 2 = 50/50
I'm done continuing with this with you.
Comment -
As you should...That's typically what someone does when they realize that they are a dumbass.
Your thread is pretty simple to understand. Ohio st or South Carolina will win.
My first post in this thread was saying, thanks for the alert, your making a pretty bold prediction......
Then you start trying to rip into me, saying I don't understand, when it's pretty simple to understand, then I tell you how your title contradicts your first post. Then you avoid that, and continue to say how clueless I am for teasing thru the 0 and for saying the title doesn't contradict the first post.
I teased thru the 0 and you bet the ML, if I took your advice I would of lost. So yes that makes me clueless.
And now that you possibly realize the whole "contradicting" part, you decide to call me an idiot and say you're done.
Typical. Solid thread.
But hey you're the one who has "sources" and you "used" to run a book....Sure thing boss.Comment -
Rudy, is this true, you used to run a book? Forgive me, I haven't looked deep enough into you history so if this has been covered don't take it badly.
So what happened? Did you grow tired of the hassle of the business and decide to retire? Did someone make you an offer you couldn't refuse and you sold out? Tell me you didn't run one of those credit books and got stiffed out of business.
Rudy as a business owner were you more laid back and patient with those that asked you questions or maybe didn't fully understand the intent of what you were saying and rather took you at the literal words you said or wrote? Did you only after getting out of the business become less cordial and tolerant of others?
I'm sure I am not the only one who has missed the Rudy story. How about a re-cap?Comment -
Go Badgers...but don't hold your breath. Week 12 against Iowa is when OSU takes 'da thumpinComment
