Alert: Ohio State might lose this week

[RudyRuetigger]

get down on it now if you plan on it.... line gonna start moving

what about the RL?

[dume walker]

Congratulations on your calls last week. Early line movement would also seem to support your calls this week. Line has moved a full point away from opening line on both Ohio State and South Carolina, when you would think they would be moving in the opposite direction based on last week's results. Yes, Kentucky put up a hell of a fight, but I believe the SC win was more impressive.

Any chance you can give us a hint as to who your sources are? Or at least how they gather their information? Thanks.

[ngates815]

1. Thread was created on Wednesday. Besides, what week doesn't Lou pick ND and USC. I am sure he will be against me this week
2. I guess noone cared when I gave out Indiana +350+ since it was a loser, but this one you do
3. I didn't clean house last week, I was up small in college football and I gave USC and UK ML's, which were only +1 fukkin unit. When did I say I went crazy and played these huge? I'm not a degen and I lost Sunday making me a loser for last week.

What does any of this have to do with me saying " you're not saying anything too unbelievable. 2 high ranked teams, playing on the road, in conference, against good teams.

You're prediction isn't anything too crazy. You picked 2 teams that were favored by a TD to lose. That's the same prediction you're making this week.


So explain to me why I'm clueless for questioning you? when anyone can see that either of these 2 teams "could" lose.

[firedawg]

what about the RL?

im not rr...... these games low scoring and decided by one run to often

[RudyRuetigger]

What does any of this have to do with me saying " you're not saying anything too unbelievable. 2 high ranked teams, playing on the road, in conference, against good teams.

You're prediction isn't anything too crazy. You picked 2 teams that were favored by a TD to lose. That's the same prediction you're making this week.


So explain to me why I'm clueless for questioning you? when anyone can see that either of these 2 teams "could" lose.

I have no problem with you saying that. This ending paragraph though is where you are clueless

Now if you proved before the game that you alot of money on South Carolina ML last week, then people should give you props, but just because you said they "might" lose, means nothing. Samsncharge69 could of said that, and if he did, should everybody praise him and tail him forever?
Good thread.

Like I said, I ended up making a unit on it (a hair more actually). I didn't bet huge, I didn't tell people to bet huge, but I did say 1 WILL because either MIGHT. I also didn't ask for praise or for people to tail me forever. So basically, every sentence was wrong which is why it was clueless.

im not rr...... these games low scoring and decided by one run to often

I might go RL depending how drunk I get before I bet it

[Joe Sharp]

Not sure what all the nonsense is about. Rudy said last week that he was sure (based on some info) that Alabama OR Auburn would lose. They both cashed if you took the points & Alabama did in fact lose.

We should be offering some insight to the matchups and discussing which is more likely to lose (OSU or USC).... instead of calling Rudy out when he's offering valuable potential plays for the board.

Thanks for the info Rudy!

[RudyRuetigger]

Not sure what all the nonsense is about. Rudy said last week that he was sure (based on some info) that Alabama OR Auburn would lose. They both cashed if you took the points & Alabama did in fact lose.

We should be offering some insight to the matchups and discussing which is more likely to lose (OSU or USC).... instead of calling Rudy out when he's offering valuable potential plays for the board.

Thanks for the info Rudy!

Thanks pal.

--------------------------------

In 95% of the threads that I give losing picks I bump them and admit I lost, got buried in NFL actually this Sunday. If I don't and I created the thread, I even create new threads stating my loss...so its not like I am only giving out plays and saying they might win, take credit for a win, and act like I dont have money on it if they they lose.

NUMEROUS guys on here I could pick out that let their thread die without admitting losses.


Lets just see what happens Saturday.

[ngates815]

Not sure what all the nonsense is about. Rudy said last week that he was sure (based on some info) that Alabama OR Auburn would lose. They both cashed if you took the points & Alabama did in fact lose.

We should be offering some insight to the matchups and discussing which is more likely to lose (OSU or USC).... instead of calling Rudy out when he's offering valuable potential plays for the board.

Thanks for the info Rudy!

OK so once again. Both games were -7.

What info did he give us? He didn't give us any reasoning to back these plays, he just said some sources, which I really doubt he has, because he would of cashed big, if he really had "sources" telling him that one team would lose.

Same with this thread, he's just stating that 1 game team could lose, not giving us any info on why 1 could lose, but it's pretty obvious to anyone that it is possible.

So thanks for bringing some insight to these games for us Rudy.

[dume walker]

Not sure if you missed my previous post. Is there any chance you could give a hint as to who your sources are? Or what dynamics they're primarily focusing on when they make these picks? Would really look forward to that. Thanks.

[alukk]

also, id prefer my thread not be in college football as i don't want 90% of those idiots in my thread. 60% of them are fukks looking for "computer model" "system" or "john morrison" 30% are going to tell me "no way man you are fukkin crazy both will roll" and never show up, much like my other thread 10% are just looking to get their daily points and will post something stupid

Very nice ....... (Im just trying yo get some points)

[RudyRuetigger]

Same with this thread, he's just stating that 1 game team could lose, not giving us any info on why 1 could lose, but it's pretty obvious to anyone that it is possible.

Like i said, you were clueless for teasing through the 0 and are showing it here. I said 1 WILL LOSE not they both COULD.

Im not fightingwarrior pal, you might be smarter than him, but stick to a level you can compete with

Not sure if you missed my previous post. Is there any chance you could give a hint as to who your sources are? Or what dynamics they're primarily focusing on when they make these picks? Would really look forward to that. Thanks.

Sorry, cannot give any sources away.

[ngates815]

Like i said, you were clueless for teasing through the 0 and are showing it here. I said 1 WILL LOSE not they both COULD.

Im not fightingwarrior pal, you might be smarter than him, but stick to a level you can compete with



Sorry, cannot give any sources away.

I haven't once stated that you said "both could lose" I've said 1 "could lose" is what you stated.

Now you're saying that 1 WILL lose? So now you're guaranteeing it, because of your "sources"

Get real buddy. Like I said you have no info to give us, just saying that 1 team favored by less than a td WILL lose. Nothing spectacular about that statement, any jabroni could come up with that

[Uncle Harv]

OSU could def go go down in Madison, but SC wins....Kentucky is garbage.

[RudyRuetigger]

I haven't once stated that you said "both could lose" I've said 1 "could lose" is what you stated.

Now you're saying that 1 WILL lose? So now you're guaranteeing it, because of your "sources"

yes, ive said WILL both fukkin times. Apparently you can't read..here let me show you... like i said you are fukkin clueless..please go back to stalking fightwarrior

Did not think it was possible. Sources are telling me South Carolina and Kentucky ML's are the plays as either Auburn or Alabama will lose outright.

My sources are telling me either Ohio State OR South Carolina will lose outright.

[Sunde91]

Rudy, good spot.

Rudy, line down 1.5 points VERY early despite OSU getting absolutely pounded by public.

Rudy, GameDay at Wisconsin, night game, biggest home game in ages.

Rudy, Wisconsin run game has shreaded OSU run D last few years.

[RudyRuetigger]

Rudy, good spot.

Rudy, line down 1.5 points VERY early despite OSU getting absolutely pounded.

Rudy, GameDay at Wisconsin, night game, biggest home game in ages.

Rudy, Wisconsin run game has shreaded OSU run D last few years.

This guy knows his shit.

[ngates815]

yes, ive said WILL both fukkin times. Apparently you can't read..here let me show you... like i said you are fukkin clueless..please go back to stalking fightwarrior

But I see you not responding to the part where you were wrong...Congrats.


I'll admit, that I read the title of the thread and then skimmed your first post.

When the title is "Ohio State MIGHT lose this week" it's a little misleading when you say they WILL lose in the first post. SO next time don't contradict yourself, and makethe title "ALERT: OSU or USC WILL lose this week", not might. In my book, might is the same as could....but not not the same as WILL.

SO again forgive me for my cluelessness.

[wal66]

Rudy, for future reference purposes. Any and all replies in your threads must agree with your opinion or statement? All others will be met with hostile relaliation?

Rudy, I understand it when there is hate towards an opinion or whatever but open discussion shouldn't set off defense mechanisms.

Rudy, don't bother replying with "just stay out of my threads" cause it's doubtful I will comply. I'll not attack you though, just discuss certain situations and posibilities and general football talk or related sporting event.

[RudyRuetigger]

But I see you not responding to the part where you were wrong...Congrats.


I'll admit, that I read the title of the thread and then skimmed your first post.

When the title is "Ohio State MIGHT lose this week" it's a little misleading when you say they WILL lose in the first post. SO next time don't contradict yourself, and makethe title "ALERT: OSU or USC WILL lose this week", not might. In my book, might is the same as could....but not not the same as WILL.

SO again forgive me for my cluelessness.

1. in BOTH threads i have said EITHER OR WILL LOSE in the first fukkin post. Do not know how much simpler it can get. Neither 1 is a guarantee, but 1 of the 2 happening is.

2. There was no contradicting. Like I said, I don't know which will lose. If I did I'd guarantee it, but since I don't, like I said over 6 times now, one will which is why both are might because I dont know which.

3. What part was I wrong on? The part that you said either could lose playing on the road to a tough conference team? hey genius, I'm saying 1 will lose and you are saying yes 1 could lose.. how the fukk do you think I am wrong?

4. You are clueless, no I won't forgive you. Go back to fightingwarrior because you have no clue here.

[RudyRuetigger]

Rudy, for future reference purposes. Any and all replies in your threads must agree with your opinion or statement? All others will be met with hostile relaliation?

Rudy, I understand it when there is hate towards an opinion or whatever but open discussion shouldn't set off defense mechanisms.

Rudy, don't bother replying with "just stay out of my threads" cause it's doubtful I will comply. I'll not attack you though, just discuss certain situations and posibilities and general football talk or related sporting event.

wal, you have "attempted" to attack me 4 or 5 times now, so im not exactly sure how you think you arent. even after that, I have tried to post "encouraging" things in your video thread.

Frankly, i think you are dumb fukkin piece of shit that has no clue
a. about sports betting
and
b. about picking up a female since you have the need to try to hook up with badnina

Also, you "attempting" to point out my argument was valid was clearly saying you think you have more common sense than everyone else that believes brock is broke since its YOUR common sense. You are bald fat fukk working in the water department that has no fukkin girl and cant pick winners. Get off your high horse pal.

[M.W.]

South Carolina will lose this week. Ohio State won't.

So, I guess I agree with you, Rudy.

[k13]

Very possibly, line is already going the other way.

South Carolina will lose to Florida.

[ngates815]

1. in BOTH threads i have said EITHER OR WILL LOSE in the first fukkin post. Do not know how much simpler it can get. Neither 1 is a guarantee, but 1 of the 2 happening is.

2. There was no contradicting. Like I said, I don't know which will lose. If I did I'd guarantee it, but since I don't, like I said over 6 times now, one will which is why both are might because I dont know which.

3. What part was I wrong on? The part that you said either could lose playing on the road to a tough conference team? hey genius, I'm saying 1 will lose and you are saying yes 1 could lose.. how the fukk do you think I am wrong?

4. You are clueless, no I won't forgive you. Go back to fightingwarrior because you have no clue here.

Jesus Christ.


1. WHY make the thread title "Alert Ohio state MIGHT lose this week" WHY not make the title "Alert : OSU or USC WILL lose this week"

2. What I thought was contradicting is that in the title you write only Ohio State and not South Carolina, and in the title you write MIGHT, and in the 1st post you write WILL. So like I said before, forgive me for not reading careful enough to catch that you wrote WILL in the 1st post, and when I skimmed I read the title and saw MIGHT.

3. post #46 : were you saying that I am clueless because you thought I said that you said both could lose?

4. Thank you. I see you can't seem to realize that your title is sort of ignorant, when you actually see what the thread states. refer to #1.

[triqy]

I see your going for 2-0 on your upset alerts...

[RudyRuetigger]

Jesus Christ.


1. WHY make the thread title "Alert Ohio state MIGHT lose this week" WHY not make the title "Alert : OSU or USC WILL lose this week"

2. What I thought was contradicting is that in the title you write only Ohio State and not South Carolina, and in the title you write MIGHT, and in the 1st post you write WILL. So like I said before, forgive me for not reading careful enough to catch that you wrote WILL in the 1st post, and when I skimmed I read the title and saw MIGHT.

3. post #46 : were you saying that I am clueless because you thought I said that you said both could lose?

4. Thank you. I see you can't seem to realize that your title is sort of ignorant, when you actually see what the thread states. refer to #1.

The title is not contradicting and definitely not ignorant. Incase you don't know, contradicting is opposites. It would be like saying Ohio State will lose this week and in the thread I said play Ohio State. The title in this instance is supporting my stance, which is what most titles do.

I addressed why I thought you were clueless in post #40

[ngates815]

Ok so contradicting was the wrong word, forgive me for my ignorance.

Still, solid thread.

[wal66]

Attack you 4 or 5 times? Easy to say Rudy but impossible to prove because it hasn't happened. The closest thing to an attack was thinking you were Onner early on and even on that I admitted why I thought that and that I was wrong very soon after. It's ok though Rudy, if you want to make yourself the offended the facts won't support you but knock yourself out.

[RudyRuetigger]

Attack you 4 or 5 times? Easy to say Rudy but impossible to prove because it hasn't happened. The closest thing to an attack was thinking you were Onner early on and even on that I admitted why I thought that and that I was wrong very soon after. It's ok though Rudy, if you want to make yourself the offended the facts won't support you but knock yourself out.

wal, you devoted a whole fukkin paragraph to be about how irrelevant i was when i had said nothing to you and then you attack an "idea" and don't think you are offending those people that support whatever "idea" it is.

wal, please stay out of my thread. there are too many red, negative numbers when you enter.

[RudyRuetigger]

Ok so contradicting was the wrong word, forgive me for my ignorance.

Still, solid thread.

So you use the wrong word and admit you didn't even read the post..atleast we have it cleared that you were clueless.

[The Bet Master]

My sources are telling me that Ohio State wins. Close game in the beginning, but tOSU wears them out as a much weaker Michigan State did earlier.

[ngates815]

So you use the wrong word and admit you didn't even read the post..atleast we have it cleared that you were clueless.

Right, I said I read the title and then didn't carefully read the first post.

I guess that makes me clueless.

[The Bet Master]

Rudy, good spot.

Rudy, line down 1.5 points VERY early despite OSU getting absolutely pounded by public.

Rudy, GameDay at Wisconsin, night game, biggest home game in ages.

Rudy, Wisconsin run game has shreaded OSU run D last few years.

2009: Wisconsin 44 Rush, 118 Yards. 2.7 AVG. That's the most relevant to this current team. I'm not seeing the Shredding of the D. Also Ohio State has one of the Best DL's in the country.

[wal66]

Nah Rudy, affraid I'll not be able to stay out of your threads from now on. I think I like your threads Rudy and feel they will continue to offer a variety of things that I will agree and disagree with.

With the exception of certain racist or attention craving hype mongers I am generally respectful to the thread originators though.

Oh Rudy we will have great fun and wonderful debates, it's gonna be simply devine.

[firedawg]

wal............ pick it up pal.. reboot that computer and pick some winners

[GiveMeaBJ]

Anyone who doesn't understand why he is posting this is a ******* retard. Sure we know all games are a "might" gates. His point is all the dumb fucks will be loading up on the #1 team only -4 (like Alabama last week). People think it is ridiculous that the #1 team will lose. Alabama looked impressive all year (like Ohio St). I played South Carolina +7 and was only mildly surprised to see SC beat Bama in the fashion they did. Everyone else I watched the game with who gamble lightly and don't understand things were acting as if App State was upsetting Michigan in the Big House again. He is just trying to point out Ohio St is not going to be a great play this week. I am on Wisconsin, and not because of this post.