Early Bowl Game Leans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ralphie Halves
    SBR MVP
    • 12-13-09
    • 4507

    #1
    Early Bowl Game Leans
    Not on these yet, but I had to go in and filter out the ones I felt good about. Can always go into further detail, but just a blurb or two for these, since I haven't really gone deep with any of them yet. And here they are:


    Dollar General Bowl

    Toledo - 7.5

    Bigger mismatch than 7.5 points IMO. Toledo dominates, Appy weirdly struggled, and seems like they found their past mojo lately, but did it against shit teams. Will be high scoring, but Toledo should pull away at some point.

    Independence Bowl

    Florida State -14.5

    Definitely not afraid of hooks in situations like this. FSU even now, without a coach, way more than 2 TDs better against a team whose only strength is Ito Smith. Nothing else SoMiss did this year impressed me.

    Holiday Bowl

    Michigan State +3

    Wazzu not as scary as first thought. Big Ten a much stronger conference than the Pac 12 was this year. Wrong team favored.

    Belk Bowl

    Wake -3

    Great coaching against a team that never bought into the system. Wake won't have to travel. Give me the -3.

    Sun Bowl

    NC St -6.5

    ASU is coachless, and has never seen a front 7 like this. Long night ahead. Get it before it gets to -7.

    Fiesta Bowl

    Penn St -3

    Love Coach Peterson, but I still think Browning is a fraud, he doesn't show up against better defenses, and although PSU's isn't great, it's better than he's used to seeing. His WRs won't be wide open like they normally are. UW has looked shaky in a few Pac 12 games, games they would have gotten destroyed in if they played most Big 10 teams. D-line not as good this year IMO, and it's made a difference.


    Bowl games are a weird animal, I'm probably just going half units on most of these, since having a real edge on any of these is a lot tougher. Weird shit happens in Bowl games. Totals? Forget it, absolute coin flip.

    What about you guys?
  • BigdaddyQH
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 07-13-09
    • 19530

    #2
    I totally and completely disagree with your Big 10 homerism that spills out in your thread. Obviously you did not watch much Big 10 football. As a matter of fact, you try to act as if you watch all of the games, when in fact, you probably do not watch 10 a week. Want proof? The Big 10 has 8 bowl teams out of 14 conference teams. that means 6 of their teams could not win enough games to get to a bowl. That is the worst of any of the Power 5 Conferences. The ACC has 10 out of 14 teams in bowl games. The Big 12 has 8 out of 10 teams in bowl games. The Pac 12 has 9 out of 12 games participating in bowl games. The SEC has 9 out of 14 teams in bowl games. Between that and the absolutely terrible post season record the Big 10 has, it is obvious that the Big 10 is the WORST of the Power 5 conferences when it comes to post season wagering. Wager on the Big 10 at your own risk.
    Comment
    • BigdaddyQH
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 07-13-09
      • 19530

      #3
      Your lines:

      Toledo -8. 62 1/2.
      Florida State -15. 49.
      Wake -3. 64.
      N.C. State -6 1/2. 59 1/2.
      Michigan St. +3. 45
      Penn State -3. 55.

      I also love the way you contradict yourself. In your opening statement you said: "Not on these yet, but I had to go in and filter out the ones I felt good about." Then you on to say when talking about the N.C. State-Arizona State game, a game that you picked N.C. State to cover: "Get it before it gets to -7." By your own admission, you have NOT taken it as of yet, but you tell everyone else to. What this demonstrates is that you are afraid to lose. Maybe because you have little or no money. Maybe it is because you have no confidence in your picks. Maybe it is because you are afraid of being wrong. Maybe it is a combination of things, but one thing is certain. You are NOT a person who gambles very much, if any at all. You will go through great lengths to claim that you were right and you know it all, but we are wise to you. You know very little about college football.
      Comment
      • Ralphie Halves
        SBR MVP
        • 12-13-09
        • 4507

        #4
        Guys, gather 'round!! Mr 33% wants to educate us on college football.

        Do go on, please.
        Comment
        • hotcross
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 08-04-17
          • 7934

          #5
          I respect you guys but one thing is seriously missing so far....

          Not one "ARSE" mentioned?!!?!?!
          Comment
          • Ralphie Halves
            SBR MVP
            • 12-13-09
            • 4507

            #6
            And no caca!
            Comment
            • Seattle Slew
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 01-02-06
              • 7373

              #7
              Did anyone else notice Michigan was listed as +9.5 against South Carolina when the lines came out? It was taken down as an error, but not sure it was posted at any books or just online.

              Anyone get Michigan +9? The line should have been reversed.
              Comment
              • Ralphie Halves
                SBR MVP
                • 12-13-09
                • 4507

                #8
                Originally posted by Seattle Slew
                Did anyone else notice Michigan was listed as +9.5 against South Carolina when the lines came out? It was taken down as an error, but not sure it was posted at any books or just online.

                Anyone get Michigan +9? The line should have been reversed.
                Wouldn't matter, the books will likely remove your bet. Never happened to me that I recall, but I've heard it enough times on SBR.
                Comment
                Search
                Collapse
                SBR Contests
                Collapse
                Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                Collapse
                Working...