power rating value....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gojetsgomoxies
    SBR MVP
    • 09-04-12
    • 4222

    #1
    power rating value....
    i am posting this simply for info purposes............... i think that later in season that power rating spread picks are probably more of reverse value than positive value i.e. spreads are anchored too much to power ratings.

    i assume that many of the power ratings (prediction machine) at the start of the season are mostly if not all based on last year's power ratings.

    i will also note that especially later in the season that often large power rating values will just have to do with injuries i.e. assume lamar jackson just got injured. well he must be worth 5 to 7 points for louisville but power rating won't adjust for that.

    anyway, here goes... strikes me it's alot of underdogs.. i eyeballed it for minimum 4 to 5 points of value based on mid-week line... bolded are the lines that are WAY OFF based on power ratings. i also put the opponent in brackets for these games)


    georgia southern
    CCS
    App state
    M O - very very hot last 6 games of last year.
    Van
    NCS - surprises me. i thought they might get overbet
    ark state
    temple (notre dame)
    tulsa
    westerm michigan (USC)
    texas A&M
    Maryland

    i'll add a second set of picks by filtering out games i don't like... i won't play vandy. so that's only one adjustment.
  • gojetsgomoxies
    SBR MVP
    • 09-04-12
    • 4222

    #2
    looked at kambour.net and fairly similar analysis although his power ratings seem more balanced to picking favorites and underdogs.

    his best picks by points of value (note that points of value and EV aren't the same as 3 points in close spread game isn't the same as 3 points in blowout spread game).

    western michagan 16 points of value
    alabama 13
    TAM 12 wrong team favoured
    navvy 12
    temple 11

    other games his power ratings favour:

    minnesota 66
    tulsa 69
    memphis 65
    wash 67
    mary 65
    iowa 65
    michigan 64
    georgia so 68

    i'll grade both these groupings..........
    Comment
    • gojetsgomoxies
      SBR MVP
      • 09-04-12
      • 4222

      #3
      eye-balling this.. for the 3 different sections it looks like 0-1, 1-0 and 0-3...... i will grade the whole thing carefully at the end of the weekend.

      temple and wm seem like the big power rating plays tomorrow
      Comment
      • gojetsgomoxies
        SBR MVP
        • 09-04-12
        • 4222

        #4
        Originally posted by gojetsgomoxies
        i am posting this simply for info purposes............... i think that later in season that power rating spread picks are probably more of reverse value than positive value i.e. spreads are anchored too much to power ratings.

        i assume that many of the power ratings (prediction machine) at the start of the season are mostly if not all based on last year's power ratings.

        i will also note that especially later in the season that often large power rating values will just have to do with injuries i.e. assume lamar jackson just got injured. well he must be worth 5 to 7 points for louisville but power rating won't adjust for that.

        anyway, here goes... strikes me it's alot of underdogs.. i eyeballed it for minimum 4 to 5 points of value based on mid-week line... bolded are the lines that are WAY OFF based on power ratings. i also put the opponent in brackets for these games)


        georgia southern W CCS W
        App state L
        M O - very very hot last 6 games of last year. L
        Van W
        NCS - surprises me. i thought they might get overbet L
        ark state W
        temple (notre dame) L
        tulsa L
        westerm michigan (USC) W
        texas A&M OPEN
        Maryland W

        i'll add a second set of picks by filtering out games i don't like... i won't play vandy. so that's only one adjustment.
        6-5 i think... one game open... EDIT: 5-5. 1 game open.
        Comment
        • gojetsgomoxies
          SBR MVP
          • 09-04-12
          • 4222

          #5
          Originally posted by gojetsgomoxies
          looked at kambour.net and fairly similar analysis although his power ratings seem more balanced to picking favorites and underdogs.

          his best picks by points of value (note that points of value and EV aren't the same as 3 points in close spread game isn't the same as 3 points in blowout spread game).

          western michagan 16 points of value W
          alabama 13 W
          TAM 12 wrong team favoured OPEN
          navvy 12 W
          temple 11 L

          other games his power ratings favour:

          minnesota 66 L
          tulsa 69 L
          memphis 65 L
          wash 67 L
          mary 65 W
          iowa 65 W
          michigan 64 W
          georgia so 68 W

          i'll grade both these groupings..........
          3-1 and 4-4
          Comment
          • shopbar picks
            SBR MVP
            • 12-08-10
            • 2157

            #6
            I kind of half hearted use sagarin for power rankings.. Haven't done any kind of record keeping of the plays. But the ones I agree with are pretty close..Has Tx A&M, winning by 8 tonight
            Comment
            • gojetsgomoxies
              SBR MVP
              • 09-04-12
              • 4222

              #7
              Originally posted by shopbar picks
              I kind of half hearted use sagarin for power rankings.. Haven't done any kind of record keeping of the plays. But the ones I agree with are pretty close..Has Tx A&M, winning by 8 tonight
              agreed, i wasn't advocating power ratings as some sort of amazing hancapping info.. but in an information bubble (people don't know the teams very well, week 1) i would think tons of people look at them.

              also, as i mentioned, later in the season power rating picks have alot to do with key injuries.
              Comment
              SBR Contests
              Collapse
              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
              Collapse
              Working...