Wrestlers do better?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • diondublin
    SBR High Roller
    • 04-16-10
    • 160

    #1
    Wrestlers do better?
    There is a systemology that proposes that wrestlers do better in MMA.

    Can this be filtered further, and how best to define 'wrestler' for profit?
  • stefan084
    SBR MVP
    • 07-21-09
    • 1490

    #2
    well currently takedowns are overrated by the current system so this may work until the judging gets tweaked
    Comment
    • Vrakas
      SBR Wise Guy
      • 02-27-10
      • 627

      #3
      It's simple really there are first time slammers and then there are wrestlers.
      Comment
      • Vrakas
        SBR Wise Guy
        • 02-27-10
        • 627

        #4
        How you best define wrestlers for profit is easy. Do you have someone who is good at takedowns? If yes they are likely a wrestler. Usually they tend to have backgrounds in highschool / college wrestling but this is not always the case.
        Comment
        • Pin2Win
          SBR High Roller
          • 01-10-11
          • 139

          #5
          Takedowns, ground control, balance, it all helps
          Comment
          • Kaladarus
            SBR MVP
            • 11-11-09
            • 1876

            #6
            Wrestling+Submission Defense=Win
            Comment
            • Preston09
              SBR MVP
              • 05-19-09
              • 1834

              #7
              Wrestlers easly can control the fight against non wrestlers. Granted the fight will be super boring 90% of the time.
              Comment
              • diondublin
                SBR High Roller
                • 04-16-10
                • 160

                #8
                Originally posted by Preston09
                Wrestlers easly can control the fight against non wrestlers. Granted the fight will be super boring 90% of the time.
                Two questions though:

                (1) How does one determine -systemically - that there is a Wrestler vs Non-Wrestler matchup?

                (2) How does one establish whether the market has accounted for this bias; i.e. is there value on the Wrestler?
                Comment
                • Chairib
                  SBR Wise Guy
                  • 03-08-10
                  • 917

                  #9
                  Originally posted by diondublin

                  Two questions though:

                  (1) How does one determine -systemically - that there is a Wrestler vs Non-Wrestler matchup?

                  (2) How does one establish whether the market has accounted for this bias; i.e. is there value on the Wrestler?
                  Good questions
                  Comment
                  • Vrakas
                    SBR Wise Guy
                    • 02-27-10
                    • 627

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Chairib
                    Good questions
                    got em!
                    Comment
                    • Chairib
                      SBR Wise Guy
                      • 03-08-10
                      • 917

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Vrakas

                      got em!
                      Seriously, those are great questions.
                      Comment
                      • jin2daj
                        SBR Wise Guy
                        • 11-01-09
                        • 816

                        #12
                        one of the most important things to know is that correlation doesnt mean causation.

                        one possible explanation for the success of wrestling is that the sport of wrestling already weeds out the weak. the unathletic and the unfit will never make it in the upper echleon of collegiate wrestling and beyond.

                        for example, a guy like ben askren who has had success in mma, that success might not be totally attributed to wrestling but to his talent. if he had devoted his time to jits or striking it's possible he would have been equally successful.

                        its just that striking and jiu jitsu dont havent developed like wrestling where you ahve high school and college programs attracting millions of kids from a young age. those who become successful and end up in the ufc are the most successful of those MILLIONS.


                        a great jits champ has proven himself among 100 others. a wrestling champ is the best of 10000 wrestlers.
                        Comment
                        • Chairib
                          SBR Wise Guy
                          • 03-08-10
                          • 917

                          #13
                          Originally posted by jin2daj
                          one of the most important things to know is that correlation doesnt mean causation.

                          one possible explanation for the success of wrestling is that the sport of wrestling already weeds out the weak. the unathletic and the unfit will never make it in the upper echleon of collegiate wrestling and beyond.

                          for example, a guy like ben askren who has had success in mma, that success might not be totally attributed to wrestling but to his talent. if he had devoted his time to jits or striking it's possible he would have been equally successful.

                          its just that striking and jiu jitsu dont havent developed like wrestling where you ahve high school and college programs attracting millions of kids from a young age. those who become successful and end up in the ufc are the most successful of those MILLIONS.


                          a great jits champ has proven himself among 100 others. a wrestling champ is the best of 10000 wrestlers.
                          Correlation doesnt mean causation? I'm going to start calling you Kaplan or Testmasters from now on, let's see you work in a Strawman argument or even an Appeal To Authority.

                          You make some good points but I definitely would avoid using Ben Askren here.
                          Comment
                          • bondguy007
                            SBR High Roller
                            • 04-02-11
                            • 109

                            #14
                            It's as simple as this: WWE wrestlers are on the road doing athletic manuevers 300 days a year. UFC guys? They're lucky if they're on the road 30 days a year.
                            Comment
                            • Vaughany
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 03-07-10
                              • 45563

                              #15
                              Originally posted by bondguy007
                              It's as simple as this: WWE wrestlers are on the road doing athletic manuevers 300 days a year. UFC guys? They're lucky if they're on the road 30 days a year.
                              Comment
                              • urge2kill
                                SBR MVP
                                • 10-27-09
                                • 1722

                                #16
                                Originally posted by bondguy007
                                It's as simple as this: WWE wrestlers are on the road doing athletic manuevers 300 days a year. UFC guys? They're lucky if they're on the road 30 days a year.
                                Comment
                                • BIGDAY
                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                  • 02-17-10
                                  • 48245

                                  #17
                                  I ussualy do well with dogs that have a good wrestling base.
                                  Comment
                                  • Vaughany
                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                    • 03-07-10
                                    • 45563

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by BIGDAY
                                    I ussualy do well with dogs that have a good wrestling base.
                                    Chance u might get one in Chandler next wknd against Freire
                                    Comment
                                    • RaiderNation MMA
                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                      • 11-05-10
                                      • 598

                                      #19
                                      the man who dictates where the fight takes place!
                                      Comment
                                      • jin2daj
                                        SBR Wise Guy
                                        • 11-01-09
                                        • 816

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Chairib
                                        Correlation doesnt mean causation? I'm going to start calling you Kaplan or Testmasters from now on, let's see you work in a Strawman argument or even an Appeal To Authority.

                                        You make some good points but I definitely would avoid using Ben Askren here.

                                        haha you took the LSAT?
                                        I actually learned causation/correlation in a college econ class
                                        Comment
                                        Search
                                        Collapse
                                        SBR Contests
                                        Collapse
                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                        Collapse
                                        Working...