Jones vs Texiera Picks
Collapse
X
-
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#36Comment -
Wilbo86SBR Wise Guy
- 01-22-14
- 753
#37All i see is chalk and roid rage... m8Comment -
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
#38just frickin, message me on here when you get to MN. If you can't find the house (since you are a retard) tighten your helmet and call a short bus. If you still cant find it.. like I said.. I'll send you a cabComment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#40
u cud be a pusy and wnt fight me bcuz ur afr8 m8
post proof and ill be der in a few hrsComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#42
where unat bigday, where u at muthhafuckaComment -
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
#46
Forget it brah.. I assure you I am there... That is my name... and that house right across the damn street. I'll fight you no problem.. But not gonna post the address where my wife and kids live (not retarded like yourself) If you got the frickin balls get your ass over here, if your not shut the hell up.Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#50
ResetAAFont size:PrintShareThis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel Lynn Conley, Appellant.
A11–278
-- February 06, 2012
Considered and decided by Halbrooks, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Stoneburner, Judge. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and John Choi, Ramsey County Attorney, Mark Nathan Lystig, Assistant County Attorney, St. Paul, Minnesota (for respondent) David W. Merchant, Chief Appellate Public Defender, G. Tony Atwal, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant)
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
In this appeal following resentencing after remand, appellant argues that (1) the admissible evidence presented to the Blakely sentencing jury was insufficient to support its findings; (2) the 300–month sentence imposed for his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct is unsupported by evidence in the record; and (3) unduly exaggerates the criminality of his conduct. Because the evidence is sufficient to support the Blakely jury's findings, the findings support the upward sentencing departure, and the sentence does not unduly exaggerate the criminality of the offense, we affirm.
FACTS
In June 2003, appellant Daniel Lynn Conley was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subds. 1(e), 2 (2002), third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subds. 1(c), 2 (2002), solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.322, subd. 1a(1) (2002), and second-degree assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.222, subd. 1 (2002). The district court imposed 300 months in prison for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, representing an upward departure from the then-presumptive guideline sentence of 158 months, and consecutive sentences of 18 and 36 months for the prostitution and assault convictions. On direct appeal, this court affirmed the convictions but reversed and remanded for resentencing consistent with the requirements of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004). State v. Conley, No. A03–1669, 2004 WL 2283421 (Minn.App. Oct. 12, 2004).
- See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/mn-court-....EpWnB6lC.dpufComment -
BettersUniteSBR Hustler
- 04-21-14
- 61
#51I ain't interested if what you have to say brah. I've been an mma fan since 93 and I've competed in jitsu several times. I know what the fu*k I'm talking about. Please enlighten me on your wealth of knowledge physically and mentally brah! If you wanna threaten me with wrath I say bring it on.. because something tells me you aint about shit. I ain't here to be a hater... but if you wanna instigate shit, I'd say save it or be willing to back it up because your opinion mean about as much to me as dog shit on my shoe.
I ain't goin anywhere....Comment -
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
#52State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel Lynn Conley, Appellant.
ResetAAFont size:PrintShareThis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel Lynn Conley, Appellant.
A11–278
-- February 06, 2012
Considered and decided by Halbrooks, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Stoneburner, Judge. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and John Choi, Ramsey County Attorney, Mark Nathan Lystig, Assistant County Attorney, St. Paul, Minnesota (for respondent) David W. Merchant, Chief Appellate Public Defender, G. Tony Atwal, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant)
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
In this appeal following resentencing after remand, appellant argues that (1) the admissible evidence presented to the Blakely sentencing jury was insufficient to support its findings; (2) the 300–month sentence imposed for his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct is unsupported by evidence in the record; and (3) unduly exaggerates the criminality of his conduct. Because the evidence is sufficient to support the Blakely jury's findings, the findings support the upward sentencing departure, and the sentence does not unduly exaggerate the criminality of the offense, we affirm.
FACTS
In June 2003, appellant Daniel Lynn Conley was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subds. 1(e), 2 (2002), third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subds. 1(c), 2 (2002), solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.322, subd. 1a(1) (2002), and second-degree assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.222, subd. 1 (2002). The district court imposed 300 months in prison for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, representing an upward departure from the then-presumptive guideline sentence of 158 months, and consecutive sentences of 18 and 36 months for the prostitution and assault convictions. On direct appeal, this court affirmed the convictions but reversed and remanded for resentencing consistent with the requirements of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004). State v. Conley, No. A03–1669, 2004 WL 2283421 (Minn.App. Oct. 12, 2004).
- See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/mn-court-....EpWnB6lC.dpuf
Definitely the wrong Dan lynn.. but a good readComment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#54Forget it brah.. I assure you I am there... That is my name... and that house right across the damn street. I'll fight you no problem.. But not gonna post the address where my wife and kids live (not retarded like yourself) If you got the frickin balls get your ass over here, if your not shut the hell up.
post pic of u in the neighbourhood and il be derComment -
BettersUniteSBR Hustler
- 04-21-14
- 61
#55Sweet troll job lol... Is that what's fun around here??Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#60When are you and nick nachos gonna bang bro? he has a tempting last name so you might be willing to bite him, after you get the munchies from weed smoking and dark souls marathons. my money is on nick though. there's something about that wig that says i'm a bad-ass in disguise.Comment -
TheCalculatorSBR MVP
- 10-10-11
- 1683
#61It would be great to set up some SBR MMA fights. Various posters going at it. MD and Mr Nacho could be our first bout. We can sell tickets for 2 betpoints.Comment -
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
-
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
#64Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#65
post pic of urself in ur neighburhuud unless u r a puss
no ballls bro?Comment -
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
#67When are you and nick nachos gonna bang bro? he has a tempting last name so you might be willing to bite him, after you get the munchies from weed smoking and dark souls marathons. my money is on nick though. there's something about that wig that says i'm a bad-ass in disguise.
Yes, put your money on Nick Nacho! Why? Because you will notice that no where in this thread did I ever say I would kill anyone, wreck anyone, send anyone to hell, or just plain old beat anyone's ass.
The reason is, I am secure enough to know what I'm capable of and I don't need to threaten harm by way of a keyboard.
This other fool "MD" is so damn insecure that challenges people to fights by way of the "keyboard warrior method." He has no clue who I am but he is certain he could "wreck me."
So needless to say.. MD is clearly an insecure, educated pile of shit. But if calling me out on in a chat room makes him feel better... more power to him.. Just hopefully he can fill this void somewhere in the real world and sometime in his miserable, weak life.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#68Yes, put your money on Nick Nacho! Why? Because you will notice that no where in this thread did I ever say I would kill anyone, wreck anyone, send anyone to hell, or just plain old beat anyone's ass.
The reason is, I am secure enough to know what I'm capable of and I don't need to threaten harm by way of a keyboard.
This other fool "MD" is so damn insecure that challenges people to fights by way of the "keyboard warrior method." He has no clue who I am but he is certain he could "wreck me."
So needless to say.. MD is clearly an insecure, educated pile of shit. But if calling me out on in a chat room makes him feel better... more power to him.. Just hopefully he can fill this void somewhere in the real world and sometime in his miserable, weak life.Comment -
Nick NachoSBR High Roller
- 04-14-14
- 144
#69
Here's the dictionary link for the word "grammar." Consider this your lesson in dictation for the day.
the study of the classes of words, their inflections, and their functions and relations in the sentence; a study of what is to be preferred and what avoided in inflection and syntax; the characteristic system of inflections and syntax of a language… See the full definition
Again, spelled "grammar." who is the idiot? you spelled idiot wrong tooComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code