2 for 2, then the rest.

**peter rose** · 05-26-13, 04:56 AM

Graded Bets

TICKET

ACCEPTED

DECIDED

TYPE

DESCRIPTION

WAGERPRICE

STAKE

+/-

305879573-1

1

1:57pm 18-May-13

25-May-13

Parlay

4-Team Parlay.

40.00

362.43

1.	Win 18-May	Mixed Martial Arts/UFC	(Money Line)	Vitor Belfort vs Luke Rockhold for Match ( 1.980)	1 - 0
2.	Win 18-May	Mixed Martial Arts/UFC	(Money Line)	Roger Hollett vs Fabio Maldonado for Match ( 1.379)	0 - 3
3.	Win 25-May	Mixed Martial Arts/UFC	(Money Line)	James Te Huna vs Glover Teixeira for Match ( 1.355)	0 - 1
4.	Win 25-May	Mixed Martial Arts/UFC	(Money Line)	T.J. Grant vs Gray Maynard for Match ( 2.720)	1 - 0

306897875-1

3

4:52pm 25-May-13

25-May-13

Mixed Martial Arts
Money Line

Robert Whittaker vs Colton Smith for Match.

2.410

50.00

70.50

**Sacrelicious** · 05-26-13, 05:41 AM

As per usual.

Gabe is a troll, period.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 11:25 AM

Originally posted by Sacrelicious

As per usual.

Gabe is a troll, period.

Yeah, posting a losing pick = trolling

Fat boy, you'll always be the worst capper here. That isn't saying much since you don't cap and just bet on who you think is going to win.

**The iron sheik** · 05-26-13, 11:39 AM

well its not really my business rubbing it in since I made a losing night last night too, but even you have to admit it is (unintentionally) hilarious that you cokk tease with your super duper inside information and super pick, and despite this "inside info"your guy gets absolutely murdered for 3 rounds, it wasn't even close

I mean jesus I'll admit my gaynard play was horrible in retrospect, but this was something else, mein gott

**Grabaka** · 05-26-13, 12:26 PM

Oh come on. Let Gabes alone. penetrating SBR . I played Payan too.
Stop tailing Gabe or at least dont get mad if you lose.

**NunyaBidness** · 05-26-13, 12:30 PM

Originally posted by Grabaka

Stop tailing Gabe or at least dont get mad if you lose.

Hahaha, best unintentional insult ever.

**Vaughany** · 05-26-13, 02:48 PM

Haha

**Vaughany** · 05-26-13, 02:50 PM

Originally posted by Dwil125

What was your inside info now that the fights over?

It was tht Payan had nailed an Armenian prozzy once

**mirinquads** · 05-26-13, 04:09 PM

Fukken quality thread

was on Pappapaeya-eya too

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 04:27 PM

Originally posted by The iron sheik

well its not really my business rubbing it in since I made a losing night last night too, but even you have to admit it is (unintentionally) hilarious that you cokk tease with your super duper inside information and super pick, and despite this "inside info"your guy gets absolutely murdered for 3 rounds, it wasn't even close

I mean jesus I'll admit my gaynard play was horrible in retrospect, but this was something else, mein gott

why are you idiots acting like the huge cut in round 1 did not play a major factor in the fight?

he was getting the better of stevens before the cut.

i said he is superior in the stand up and he was, clearly in rounds 1 and 3. blood affected his vision plus weakened him, so stephens was able to get takedowns he normally wouldn't.

this was a great play with lots of value. i didn't even have to post it here, but i did it anyway. a flukey cut happened and everything went downhill from there. rogan went from complimenting payan before the cut to kissing stephens ass after the cut. keep hatin.

and Maynard was a worse play. Maynard got finished. This dude fought through all that and beat Stephens up in the 3rd for 3 mins. Most would have been RNC'd in the 2nd.

The cut turned the fight around, tanked my play, and brought the haters out.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 04:28 PM

If anybody tailed me, they should have broken even with Not Stephens ITD. I went 1-1. I didn't have a bad night. Morons.

**mirinquads** · 05-26-13, 04:29 PM

Youre too easy to troll son, the pick was good, relax. Just like Story was.

**Sacrelicious** · 05-26-13, 04:34 PM

Flier on Elkins.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 05:05 PM

This message is hidden because Sacrelicious is on your ignore list.

View Post

Remove user from ignore list

yallreadykno i'm allboutthat thug life

**Vaughany** · 05-26-13, 05:40 PM

Lol

MD · 05-26-13, 08:04 PM

Originally posted by gabe

If anybody tailed me, they should have broken even with Not Stephens ITD. I went 1-1. I didn't have a bad night. Morons.

A -140 1 unit play cashing and a +180 1 unit play mushing nets you a loss my nigguh.

No need to get defensive about the play, by the way. It missed; it happens. Don't worry about it.

Should have tailed me on Thompson though.

**NunyaBidness** · 05-26-13, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by MD

A -140 1 unit play cashing and a +180 1 unit play mushing nets you a loss my nigguh.

Lolwut?

Really gonna let gabe mathown you twice in the same thread?

MD · 05-26-13, 08:30 PM

Originally posted by NunyaBidness

Lolwut?

Really gonna let gabe mathown you twice in the same thread?

I'm not wrong here, though. Besides, I already explained, one of those four bets was a flier.

You're suggesting that you'd break even if you bet to win one unit on Gabe's -140 play, and risking one unit on his +180 play. Not the same thing. Especially considering that most people who read this thread will have no reason to think they should bet more on the -140 play. I sincerely doubt that anyone who tailed both of Gabe's plays broke even.

**Sacrelicious** · 05-26-13, 08:32 PM

Flier on Elkins.

**Hannibal** · 05-26-13, 08:33 PM

If 1 unit to risk, md is right
If 1 unit is base amount, nunya will be correct

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 08:35 PM

$100 to win $180
$140 to win $100

=

EVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 08:36 PM

Originally posted by MD

I sincerely doubt that anyone who tailed both of Gabe's plays broke even.

no one tailed me

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 08:37 PM

2 for 2 in out-schooling MD in 1 thread. i'm just gonna cruise through the third for a 29-28.

MD · 05-26-13, 08:43 PM

Originally posted by gabe

2 for 2 in out-schooling MD in 1 thread. i'm just gonna cruise through the third for a 29-28.

I actually think you're definitely wrong here. My discussion with Nunya is pretty much semantics, but you posted two plays, the first of which you discussed in depth and hyped repeatedly, the second of which you barely discussed, and then said that people will break even if they bet more on the second play. I think it's silly to assume anyone who's tailing you is betting more on the play that you've shown less confidence in.

Unless Payan was a flier of course.

(kidding)

**sideloaded** · 05-26-13, 10:46 PM

Originally posted by MD

I'm not wrong here, though.

We know, you've brow beaten the entire forum with this point. To the point no one enjoys seeing your name popup on the screen.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 10:50 PM

Originally posted by MD

I actually think you're definitely wrong here. My discussion with Nunya is pretty much semantics, but you posted two plays, the first of which you discussed in depth and hyped repeatedly, the second of which you barely discussed, and then said that people will break even if they bet more on the second play. I think it's silly to assume anyone who's tailing you is betting more on the play that you've shown less confidence in.

Unless Payan was a flier of course.

(kidding)

i said i was going 2 for 2, meaning was confident both will cash. didn't say how much to go on each. if anything, anybody with an IQ above 90 would figure the -140 has a greater chance of cashing.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 10:51 PM

...i did say it was a precautionary bet when you asked. i said only way i saw stephens winning was a bad decision. it wasn't a bad one, but just the same- smart bet like i predicted. it would either add more to your winnings or save you from a loss.

MD · 05-26-13, 11:27 PM

Originally posted by gabe

i said i was going 2 for 2, meaning was confident both will cash. didn't say how much to go on each. if anything, anybody with an IQ above 90 would figure the -140 has a greater chance of cashing.

You did say you only played the -140 because the +180 was maxed, to be fair. You also said you thought Payan was -200 to win.

Again, not criticizing you for your bets - I was on Payan too. Dunno if I regret the bet or not though.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 11:38 PM

I think he wins if not for the cut. Stephens couldn't stand with him, and he wouldn't get the takedowns easily if not for the bloodloss + blood in eyes

MD · 05-26-13, 11:46 PM

Originally posted by gabe

I think he wins if not for the cut. Stephens couldn't stand with him, and he wouldn't get the takedowns easily if not for the bloodloss + blood in eyes

I 'capped Payan at about -130, I thought he had a slight edge. I didn't think Stephens would be able to get him down by just shooting double-legs at him, as he seems to have very strong TDD, and his left hook and jab are light-years ahead of almost everyone in MMA. He's easy to counter, though, and I figured that if Stephens mixed up his striking and takedowns, a KO or a dominant points victory were possible. He didn't really mix it up, but Payan still couldn't stop his takedowns. A bit surprising.

**gabe** · 05-26-13, 11:59 PM

Originally posted by MD

I 'capped Payan at about -130, I thought he had a slight edge. I didn't think Stephens would be able to get him down by just shooting double-legs at him, as he seems to have very strong TDD, and his left hook and jab are light-years ahead of almost everyone in MMA. He's easy to counter, though, and I figured that if Stephens mixed up his striking and takedowns, a KO or a dominant points victory were possible. He didn't really mix it up, but Payan still couldn't stop his takedowns. A bit surprising.

You're surprised that a dude who lost that many pints of blood with said blood filling his eyes couldn't continuously defend takedowns?

**TheCalculator** · 05-27-13, 12:50 AM

Originally posted by MD

I 'capped Payan at about -130, I thought he had a slight edge. I didn't think Stephens would be able to get him down by just shooting double-legs at him, as he seems to have very strong TDD, and his left hook and jab are light-years ahead of almost everyone in MMA. He's easy to counter, though, and I figured that if Stephens mixed up his striking and takedowns, a KO or a dominant points victory were possible. He didn't really mix it up, but Payan still couldn't stop his takedowns. A bit surprising.

I was surprised also.

He was getting the best of Stephens striking wise.

It seems like the 1st "takedown" wasn't really a takedown. It seemed like he went for a guillotine (a mistake 95% of the time) ended up on his back and Stephens hurt him with that elbow. It was all downhill from there. He couldn't stop the takedowns. Loss of strength due to blood loss? Very possible.

**Thor4140** · 05-27-13, 09:51 AM

This guy has been caught making shit up his whole posting career here at SBR so why would anyone take him seriously when he says he has inside info? lol

**NunyaBidness** · 05-27-13, 10:20 AM

Originally posted by MD

I'm not wrong here, though. Besides, I already explained, one of those four bets was a flier.

You're suggesting that you'd break even if you bet to win one unit on Gabe's -140 play, and risking one unit on his +180 play.

It is absolutely standard to bet to win one unit on favs and risk one unit on dogs. So much so, that if you go to most major books and enter that you want to bet 100 on a -140 play, you will end up with 140 to win 100. Standard.

MD · 05-27-13, 10:24 AM

Originally posted by NunyaBidness

It is absolutely standard to bet to win one unit on favs and risk one unit on dogs. So much so, that if you go to most major books and enter that you want to bet 100 on a -140 play, you will end up with 140 to win 100. Standard.

I am aware of how sportsbooks work, and you are aware of how irrelevant that is. You're also aware of what quality of gamblers bet "to win one unit on favourites, risk one unit on dogs"