Would like to hear some opinions on this topic. I have been experimenting with this for close to 6 weeks now and I have yet to find anything solid.
I have been using team specific stats vs all active batters via baseball reference. What I am finding is that 80% of the sample sizes are too small. I use AVG/OPS/KBB and compare each SP. Stats are skewed.
Park specific ERA won't work either in theory because those historic results contain batting data from players not playing for that team.
I am stuck here. Has anyone found anything that seems to be a little more stable? Right now all I can tell you is that KBB is the most highly correlated pitching stat with winning percentage. Everything else seems like a crap-shoot to me, but I know there is something out there.
Thanks
I have been using team specific stats vs all active batters via baseball reference. What I am finding is that 80% of the sample sizes are too small. I use AVG/OPS/KBB and compare each SP. Stats are skewed.
Park specific ERA won't work either in theory because those historic results contain batting data from players not playing for that team.
I am stuck here. Has anyone found anything that seems to be a little more stable? Right now all I can tell you is that KBB is the most highly correlated pitching stat with winning percentage. Everything else seems like a crap-shoot to me, but I know there is something out there.
Thanks