Originally Posted by
BeatingBaseball
I’m in no way saying it’s that simple, of course. But as you know, 5’s, there’s an old adage in sports betting:
“Wise guys don’t play teams – squares play teams - wise guys play numbers.”
I long ago concluded that adages become adages for a reason. I’m a firm believer that you have to come up with a number on everything you look to bet. And to get to that number, you have to start somewhere.
Once we have more information, every matchup must certainly be handicapped independently. There will always be a guy in another uniform on the same mound - and sometimes he’ll be named Lincecum, Cain, Bumgarner, Sanchez, Kershaw, Santana, Wainwright, etc.. But I would say that with all the information we have at this moment - if you had to bet all 162 – the 1.75 theory would be a pretty solid starting point. The first macro adjustment I would want to make to it would be home/road. The next tweak would probably be their facing LH or RH starters if we had that information.
With all the crazy things that happen to a ball club over the course of a season – the streaks, slumps, injuries, bad breaks, bad calls, etc., it always amazes how the game’s bottom lines so often fall so very close to the long term averages. A .280 hitter is a .280 hitter – and I have to think that, when all is said and done, a proven .636 starting rotation will end up pretty close to a .636 starting rotation.
BB