John Morrison 2011 MLB

[oklahoma]

damn missed it by 3 mins. pitt looks good already, hopefully the live line isnt too brutal.

[soldier1047]

not to mention half of your system is about playing +odds.....moron contradicting yourself

Too early in the morning for name calling.

[oklahoma]

got pirates live at -1.5/ml +204/+113. bol.

[1gamer]

Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed

[Wallco99]

not to mention half of your system is about playing +odds.....moron contradicting yourself

Actually it's 2/3, and there is no contradiction. Plays are based on past history, not gut feelings and betting on what a team SHOULD do or NEEDS to do. These are theories gamblers use, not system players.

[Glada Tartan]

Gooooo Cubs!!!

[allidoiswin89]

Actually it's 2/3, and there is no contradiction. Plays are based on past history, not gut feelings and betting on what a team SHOULD do or NEEDS to do. These are theories gamblers use, not system players.

i was just stating for cubs fans they need these series'. i don't factor that into my bets nor did i ever say i did. i research just as much as the next guy and yea BASED ON HISTORY, the cubs will win one of the next 4 games dumbass

[GGPLAYER]

got pirates live at -1.5/ml +204/+113. bol.

Damn that is WAY better than what I got before the game started. This might be something to consider for future wagers.

Can you only do live wagers in the 1st inning?

[Wallco99]

i was just stating for cubs fans they need these series'. i don't factor that into my bets nor did i ever say i did. i research just as much as the next guy and yea BASED ON HISTORY, the cubs will win one of the next 4 games dumbass

I am sorry if you took that wrong, because it was not typed as an insult, just my way of saying be careful, that was all it was. No need to brutally attack. And I don't remember ever saying they wouldn't win one of the four games, or even we wouldn't be playing them one of the four games. These topics never came up.

[dlunc3]

Damn that is WAY better than what I got before the game started. This might be something to consider for future wagers.

Can you only do live wagers in the 1st inning?

Wow same here.. I only got +150 with my local.. and +135 at sb.com .....

[dlunc3]

here we go lets blow this game out early! bases loaded no outs already 1-0!

[arf1215]

Wallco99, 1st post here, thanks for your picks! Your system rocks! You make it VERY CLEAR and easy to understand! Don't change anything!! Thanks

[oklahoma]

Damn that is WAY better than what I got before the game started. This might be something to consider for future wagers.

Can you only do live wagers in the 1st inning?

you can live wager throughout the game i believe. but if pittsburgh had scored 2 or more runs in the first the runline would be -2.5 or higher. i got real lucky there considering the pirates almost had runners on each base.

[dlunc3]

ughh.. bases loaded no outs and pitt only gets one.. oh well, I guess 2-0 after 2 innings isnt bad..

[pagodo]

Thanks for the plays, Wallco.

I've got Cubs on the money line as a system play of mine, so I hope to cash 3+ units on this series by the end of the week.

Wonderful stuff, good luck everyone!

[ok15533]

Lol I see a lot of Chalie Sheep & Tiger blood here on the thread.

[MARCUS]

You can consider signing up after peeimpee's free trial expires!

...GOOD THINKING BUGS!!......BOL ALL!

[gator46]

well, pirates style...let's see if we can make this close...4-2 now

[peeiempee]

Hanrahan comes through. Nice pick system pick Wallco. Now we need Balto and POSSIBLY Nats

[J.M. Disciple]

I think Wallco's professionalism owned allidoiswin89 lol

Nice job of not letting his rude comments get to you. Just keep printing money.

It helps to keep a level head allidoiswin89 because you were basically arguing with yourself there. Wallco never said Cubs wouldn't win one of the next four.

[J.M. Disciple]

Pittsburgh (M/L) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
Pittsburgh (-1½) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Washington (M/L) (A) (7:05 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Washington (-1½) (A) (7:05 pm EDT)
Baltimore (M/L) @ Oakland (A) *Official* (10:05 pm EDT)



So if I was using a Labby with this system I would need 3 ines right?


5 5 5 5 Pits ML
5 5 5 5 Pits -1.5
5 5 5 5 Bal ML

For others who do labby how do you make this work day to day? I heard someone say

line 1 = game 1/3
line 2 = game 2/4

Should I always do ML on one line and -1.5 on a separate line or do you all mix and match?

Some one please break down there labby mathod to me. I understand how the labby works and how to use it, just dont know how others are using it for this system.

Thank you in advance for the help
JMD

[thelimit0310]

JMD

I do the latter of what you said, Line 1: Game 1/3 Line 2: Game 2/4. If lines get big reshuffle. I'm sure just 1 line would also work with this system well because the bets never seem to get too large. Who knows though.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 5/27/11
2011 System to date: 72-2
System profit/loss: +76.57 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +56.3 units (57-2) (fin. series)
Current open series: 0


Pittsburgh (M/L) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT) - Win
Pittsburgh (-1½) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT) - Win
San Diego @ Washington (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Washington (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Baltimore (M/L) @ Oakland (A) *Official* (10:05 pm EDT)



** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[allidoiswin89]

Pittsburgh (M/L) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
Pittsburgh (-1½) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Washington (M/L) (A) (7:05 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Washington (-1½) (A) (7:05 pm EDT)
Baltimore (M/L) @ Oakland (A) *Official* (10:05 pm EDT)



So if I was using a Labby with this system I would need 3 ines right?


5 5 5 5 Pits ML
5 5 5 5 Pits -1.5
5 5 5 5 Bal ML

For others who do labby how do you make this work day to day? I heard someone say

line 1 = game 1/3
line 2 = game 2/4

Should I always do ML on one line and -1.5 on a separate line or do you all mix and match?

Some one please break down there labby mathod to me. I understand how the labby works and how to use it, just dont know how others are using it for this system.

Thank you in advance for the help
JMD

hey dip shit, one this question has been answered a 100 times and 2, it has been said not to re-post picks so it doesn't confuse the retards like yourself that can't read a forum.....do you have your dad wipe your ass too?

[oklahoma]

hey dip shit, one this question has been answered a 100 times and 2, it has been said not to re-post picks so it doesn't confuse the retards like yourself that can't read a forum.....do you have your dad wipe your ass too?

pfft why you mad? pretty sure forums are meant for questions and discussion. neither of which you have done in this thread.

[SkivChef]

Hey addiasBIAAtch69er, Take a hike loser!

[SkivChef]

was addiosloser00 already taken?

[ross607]

Hey jmd... it's good to see you back in the thread. Just ignore the dick....

[allidoiswin89]

pfft why you mad? pretty sure forums are meant for questions and discussion. neither of which you have done in this thread.

apparently you don't read either. go back through the last 100 pgs of this forum and you will see i have.....

[1gamer]

He's "steaming" because he was called a "gambler" today and he went against a System pick by taking the Cubs...

[Wallco99]

Maybe I missed it but weren't you going with R/L for the A bet only , no longer M/L bet and R/L bet for the "A" bet?

What exactly do you mean, I don't understand the question?

[allidoiswin89]

He's "steaming" because he was called a "gambler" today and he went against a System pick by taking the Cubs...

lol no. sorry i do my own research for myself. i guess thats a crime. i'm not mad at all. when the cubs win, i'll be getting more +units than you guys will by winning your (a) bet.....

[1gamer]

lol no. sorry i do my own research for myself. i guess thats a crime. i'm not mad at all. when the cubs win, i'll be getting more +units than you guys will by winning your (a) bet.....

I will be tailing on the remaining three (3) game set with the Cubs.

[peeiempee]

What exactly do you mean, I don't understand the question?

I think he jumped on board at the double header Rockies game Tuesday and didn't go back and read the previous posts. To answer your question Dukesmo, that was a one time occurance. Usually it's ML or RL for A bets.

[ken23lau]

Allhedoesislose