Originally posted by shoebox
I'd play these totals if I still played totals
Collapse
X
-
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#36I just posted what he asked me, word for word.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#37How is MLB "easier to beat," LB? If so, of all the top cappers on this site, why are there hardly any who are better at MLB than NBA or NFL?
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that at all.Comment -
shoeboxRestricted User
- 11-26-08
- 5710
#38Originally posted by No coincidencesHow is MLB "easier to beat," LB? If so, of all the top cappers on this site, why are there hardly any who are better at MLB than NBA or NFL?
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that at all.
MLB is statistical, NBA is more situational, and NFL is both, most cappers on this site are only capping games based on what espn or covers has to say.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#39So when it comes to NBA or NFL, the cappers on this site don't do that, but with MLB, they do?Originally posted by shoeboxMLB is statistical, NBA is more situational, and NFL is both, most cappers on this site are only capping games based on what espn or covers has to say.

If you think MLB is only statistical and not situational as well, we're never going to get anywhere with this conversation.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy- 01-26-09
- 88966
#40Originally posted by No coincidencesI'm not getting riled up -- it's all good.
Not sure why you had to throw me in with DIESEL, though as a "board drunk" -- how did you expect me to react to that?
yea id get a little bent out of shape if someone lumped me together with tha dies....Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#41You just have to pick the winner , no spreads. Most guys who get burried in bases play too many huge chalky ml plays. Dont forget with so many games on a daily basis its easier to find a spot to beat the oddsmakers. NFL has games on sunday only(except the monday )and linemakers have lots of time to focus on those games. Same with NBA , way less action.Originally posted by No coincidencesHow is MLB "easier to beat," LB? If so, of all the top cappers on this site, why are there hardly any who are better at MLB than NBA or NFL?
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that at all.Comment -
shoeboxRestricted User
- 11-26-08
- 5710
#42Originally posted by No coincidencesSo when it comes to NBA or NFL, the cappers on this site don't do that, but with MLB, they do?

If you think MLB is only statistical and not situational as well, we're never going to get anywhere with this conversation.
And how many guys on this site actually put a jersey on and have an accurate record? Less than 3% the rest are to busy trying to make themselves famous online
Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#43I don't count NoCoin because I'm the first to admit I know jack about capping MLB, especially this year because I've hardly looked at it at all. Tennis - I'm decent. MLB - I'm baaaaad. I just pop in and out at random and I'm lucky if I'll average 3 bets a week for the whole season. I still think the whole sport is screwy but I guess I would think that since I don't bother putting the effort in other than looking at pitchers and past stats once in awhile.Originally posted by No coincidencesKnew you couldn't resist throwing your two cents in on this. So shari says it and it's OK, but I say it and it's because I'm the "forum drunk."
Wonder if LB would agree with you on the NBA vs. MLB, shoe? Or maybe we should take a look at your record -- which sport are you better at capping?
Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#44But on the flip side, as I pointed out to shoe earlier, players tend to not give 100% to each game because there are so many. So you're not going to get maximum effort from an MLB team every time out -- far from it -- compared to, say, the NFL. I think it goes both ways -- oddsmakers don't have as much time to study and set a line, but it's also hard to know when you're going to get what I like to call "getaway day-ed" by an MLB team who knows it's a 162-game grind and they have to pick and choose their battles.Originally posted by lakerboyYou just have to pick the winner , no spreads. Most guys who get burried in bases play too many huge chalky ml plays. Dont forget with so many games on a daily basis its easier to find a spot to beat the oddsmakers. NFL has games on sunday only(except the monday )and linemakers have lots of time to focus on those games. Same with NBA , way less action.
I also think the injury factor plays a huge role. There are injury reports for the NFL, but in MLB, I think players take the field with a lot more wear and tear than what's reported. That's why you tend to see fluke or flop years from certain guys -- a lot depends on how healthy they truly are, which isn't reported with as much accuracy and disclosure as other sports.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#45I'm still trying to figure out how/why that's any different than the NFL or NBA season. I see more people able to maintain a higher level of week in and week out success in the NBA, for instance, than in MLB. Look at LB's record, SJ, you, paco, LC, etc., etc. on the NBA forum alone. There were others. So where are all the MLB standouts?Originally posted by shoeboxAnd how many guys on this site actually put a jersey on and have an accurate record? Less than 3% the rest are to busy trying to make themselves famous online
Comment -
shoeboxRestricted User
- 11-26-08
- 5710
#46Originally posted by No coincidencesI'm still trying to figure out how/why that's any different than the NFL or NBA season. I see more people able to maintain a higher level of week in and week out success in the NBA, for instance, than in MLB. Look at LB's record, SJ, you, LC, etc., etc. on the NBA forum alone. There were others. So where are all the MLB standouts?
NBA is situational your comparing apples and oranges. Pure stats doesnt work in the NBA thats why the transistion from that section is struggling. Im having a better 1h than in the NBA, so I dont understand the comment? Todays action no coin the best and classiest poster here
the man is slaying books and goes about his business. An FYI im not one of the sharpest here at all, I just have gotten lucky on a few rolls
Comment -
MidgetTossersSBR Posting Legend
- 11-06-09
- 13376
#47i'll tell u guys one thing i know for sure....none of it is easy in my honest opinion....
Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#48TA and paco are about the only two I can name. RT and LC do well, but not necessarily better than in other sports. "Pure stats" doesn't work solely in any sport -- baseball included. If it did, you would've cleaned up with the Brewers and SD/COL under yesterday (based on Wandy and Francis' numbers). Why is the NBA more "situational" and MLB more "statistical" than vice versa? Please explain. Again, I think it depends on the teams and players you're talking about -- and in MLB, it becomes even more situational based on weather (not an element to consider in NBA games).Originally posted by shoeboxNBA is situational your comparing apples and oranges. Pure stats doesnt work in the NBA thats why the transistion from that section is struggling. Im having a better 1h than in the NBA, so I dont understand the comment? Todays action no coin the best and classiest poster here
the man is slaying books and goes about his business. An FYI im not one of the sharpest here at all, I just have gotten lucky on a few rolls
Comment -
MidgetTossersSBR Posting Legend
- 11-06-09
- 13376
#49and saying that i have the utmost respect for all of u guys....
Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#50Originally posted by No coincidencesBut on the flip side, as I pointed out to shoe earlier, players tend to not give 100% to each game because there are so many. So you're not going to get maximum effort from an MLB team every time out -- far from it -- compared to, say, the NFL. I think it goes both ways -- oddsmakers don't have as much time to study and set a line, but it's also hard to know when you're going to get what I like to call "getaway day-ed" by an MLB team who knows it's a 162-game grind and they have to pick and choose their battles.
I also think the injury factor plays a huge role. There are injury reports for the NFL, but in MLB, I think players take the field with a lot more wear and tear than what's reported. That's why you tend to see fluke or flop years from certain guys -- a lot depends on how healthy they truly are, which isn't reported with as much accuracy and disclosure as other sports.
So you think NBA players dont mail it in?
What about NFL teams that are up big and let the other off the hook and allow the back door cover. You can make cases for both sides in every sport if you want. Have you been thru a whole NFL and NBA season playing (betting)?Comment -
shoeboxRestricted User
- 11-26-08
- 5710
#51Originally posted by lakerboySo you think NBA players dont mail it in?
What about NFL teams that are up big and let the other off the hook and allow the back door cover. You can make cases for both sides in every sport if you want. Have you been thru a whole NFL and NBA season playing (betting)?
NBA players are the worst
Or the texans blowing huge leads to the colts
Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#52NBA players do mail it in at times, but each game is more important to the end result of their season because there aren't as many (although at 82 games, there are definitely no-show examples). I'm not saying there aren't games like that in the NBA, backdoor covers in the NFL, etc., but in a 162-game season where games are dictated by situation and strategy (managers who eff up like Torre did last Sunday, bullpen flunkies who come in and blow a game, weather changes, etc.), the unusual results tend to pile up much quicker.Originally posted by lakerboySo you think NBA players dont mail it in?
What about NFL teams that are up big and let the other off the hook and allow the back door cover. You can make cases for both sides in every sport if you want. Have you been thru a whole NFL and NBA season playing (betting)?
I'd ask you the same thing I asked shoe: if it's as simple as picking a winner, why aren't more people successful at it? Why doesn't the public bet baseball more than NFL and NBA? Why doesn't the public win more than in NFL or NBA? (which would support your bookie comment).Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#53You think NBA players are worse than some piece of shit who's asleep in the bullpen when he gets the call to come in and promptly cough up a lead?Originally posted by shoeboxNBA players are the worst
Or the texans blowing huge leads to the colts
Comment -
shoeboxRestricted User
- 11-26-08
- 5710
#54Originally posted by No coincidencesYou think NBA players are worse than some piece of shit who's asleep in the bullpen when he gets the call to come in and promptly cough up a lead?
without a doubt, those that have played the game kniow they give it their all each and every night. Pitchers are not going to "give" in and battters are not just going to strike out on purpose cause their lazy. Wouldnt the association be worth watching if the entire league had the intensity of KG.
Unless your goat milk of course and playing with Kobe dolls
Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy- 01-26-09
- 88966
#55each game is far from important in the NBA NC, come on man sure there less games but everyone makes the playoffs, you telling me bos and la were playing regular season games like they really mattered?Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#56Are you kidding yourself? the public gets burried in the NBA and NFL. Look how many public plays in baseball when on a regular basis. Didnt the public just cash out on yanks rl and ml today? Thruout the NBA season the public loses on huge public plays way more than NFL and NBA. My bookie wants me to bet nfl and nba only cause he doenst have any work to do.Originally posted by No coincidencesNBA players do mail it in at times, but each game is more important to the end result of their season because there aren't as many (although at 82 games, there are definitely no-show examples). I'm not saying there aren't games like that in the NBA, backdoor covers in the NFL, etc., but in a 162-game season where games are dictated by situation and strategy (managers who eff up like Torre did last Sunday, bullpen flunkies who come in and blow a game, weather changes, etc.), the unusual results tend to pile up much quicker.
I'd ask you the same thing I asked shoe: if it's as simple as picking a winner, why aren't more people successful at it? Why doesn't the public bet baseball more than NFL and NBA? Why doesn't the public win more than in NFL or NBA? (which would support your bookie comment).
The public doesnt bet it more because its fukkin boring.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#57"Those that have played the game"? Did you? Because I did through college and had a few buddies get into the minor league system -- or were you just assuming I'm some fat geek loser who never picked up a ball in my life?Originally posted by shoebox
without a doubt, those that have played the game kniow they give it their all each and every night. Pitchers are not going to "give" in and battters are not just going to strike out on purpose cause their lazy. Wouldnt the association be worth watching if the entire league had the intensity of KG.
Unless your goat milk of course and playing with Kobe dolls 
They give their all each and every night? Come on. I never said they do any of it on purpose to tank/throw games, necessarily, but you can sign a multi-million dollar contract guaranteed just for being a decent relief pitcher. All MLB salaries are guaranteed. These guys pick and choose their spots for maximum effort because, with 162 games in six months, they have to.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#58How is taking the Yankees today any different than taking the Lakers ML against some crappy last-place team at -300?Originally posted by lakerboyAre you kidding yourself? the public gets burried in the NBA and NFL. Look how many public plays in baseball when on a regular basis. Didnt the public just cash out on yanks rl and ml today? Thruout the NBA season the public loses on huge public plays way more than NFL and NBA. My bookie wants me to bet nfl and nba only cause he doenst have any work to do.
The public doesnt bet it more because its fukkin boring.
If there is proof out there that Joe Square makes more money betting MLB than NFL or NBA, I'd like to see it. You assume the public isn't betting MLB because it's boring, but with nothing else to bet on, I'm saying they would be if they could regularly make $$$ doing it. Why would fantasy baseball be so popular, but betting on baseball not be?
Maybe I'm wrong.Comment -
shoeboxRestricted User
- 11-26-08
- 5710
#59Originally posted by No coincidences"Those that have played the game"? Did you? Because I did through college and had a few buddies get into the minor league system -- or were you just assuming I'm some fat geek loser who never picked up a ball in my life?
OMG I dont even know what to say, you act like im always coming at you. I also know some MLB players right now and I have talked to them about the long season.
They give their all each and every night? Come on. I never said they do any of it on purpose to tank/throw games, necessarily, but you can sign a multi-million dollar contract guaranteed just for being a decent relief pitcher. All MLB salaries are guaranteed. These guys pick and choose their spots for maximum effort because, with 162 games in six months, they have to.
no coin stop taking everything so personal
Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#60Originally posted by No coincidencesHow is taking the Yankees today any different than taking the Lakers ML against some crappy last-place team at -300?
If there is proof out there that Joe Square makes more money betting MLB than NFL or NBA, I'd like to see it. You assume the public isn't betting MLB because it's boring, but with nothing else to bet on, I'm saying they would be if they could regularly make $$$ doing it. Why would Fantasy baseball be so popular, but betting on baseball not be?
Maybe I'm wrong.
Would you ever get LAkers ML at only -300 against the 76ers at home?Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#61Wouldn't you?Originally posted by lakerboyWould you ever get LAkers ML at only -300 against the 76ers at home?Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#62I will also say this: there's a better chance that the Yankees get beat by the M's at home than the Lakers losing in a similar situation. Not to say that they both don't happen, but in MLB, if you win at a .590 clip you're the best team in baseball. In the NBA, that's more like .700-750.Originally posted by lakerboyWould you ever get LAkers ML at only -300 against the 76ers at home?Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#63Originally posted by No coincidencesI will also say this: there's a better chance that the Yankees get beat by the M's at home than the Lakers losing in a similar situation. Not to say that they both don't happen, but in MLB, if you win at a .590 clip you're the best team in baseball. In the NBA, that's more like .700-750.
you are making my point all by yourself. thats why bases is better to bet on. you cant take lakers because its gonna be -1000 at least and you know they wont lose so you cant take philly either. since the bases teams have more dogs winning why wouldnt you spot bet dogs with a higher chance of winning?Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#64A Lakers-Sixers regular season ML (or a game to that effect) is -1000 at least?Originally posted by lakerboyyou are making my point all by yourself. thats why bases is better to bet on. you cant take lakers because its gonna be -1000 at least and you know they wont lose so you cant take philly either. since the bases teams have more dogs winning why wouldnt you spot bet dogs with a higher chance of winning?

Guess I don't pay enough attention to ML's.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy- 01-26-09
- 88966
#65so you playing any totals NC? min und and tex ov for me, to go with tor und earlierComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#66I like the Minnesota under and am leaning Texas under, but not sure if I play either.Originally posted by 2daBankso you playing any totals NC? min und and tex ov for me, to go with tor und earlier
I haven't been on a total in a month, and it's been kind of nice.
May just go with Oakland and Philly. I'm up a little from the afternoon, so I don't want to get too far ahead of myself.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#67I just saw the Philly line opened at +187 for PIT and is now down to +168 -- might just pass on that one as well.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy- 01-26-09
- 88966
#68Originally posted by No coincidencesI just saw the Philly line opened at +187 for PIT and is now down to +168 -- might just pass on that one as well.
yea i considered pit last night but decided just to pass, i see diesel is on phi so maybe i should have pulled the trigger...all my plays are in the thread you started asking bout stl.......gl tonightComment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy- 01-26-09
- 88966
#69mlb tonight guy just compared target field to Safco, that makes me feel good about the under i guessComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#70You too, buddy -- I like your plays.Originally posted by 2daBankmlb tonight guy just compared target field to Safco, that makes me feel good about the under i guess
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code

my friend