Damn that global warming!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • irish1
    SBR MVP
    • 12-25-12
    • 4837

    #1
    Damn that global warming!
    'Ice Friday' spells flight cancellations, power outages across South and Midwest

    Brandon Wade / EPA
    An American Airlines employee hands out cots to stranded airline passengers at Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport on Thursday.


    By Alexander Smith, NBC News contributor
    Hundreds of flights were delayed and more 100,000 people are facing power outages after a huge storm dumped snow and ice across a large swath of the South and Midwest, officials said Friday.
    Some 32 million people are expected to be affected by the severe winter weather, which has prompted at least five governors to declare a state of emergency.
    Dallas-Fort Worth was the largest metropolitan area hit by ice, and an area from Oklahoma City to Columbus, Ohio, has seen between 5 and 10 inches of snow, Michael Palmer, lead meteorologist at The Weather Channel, said.
    More than 500 flights at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport were canceled on Thursday and Friday, according to FlightAware.com.
    Advertise | AdChoices









    "Some roads will be impassible, but the biggest issue will be the power outages," Palmer said. "The ice weighs down on trees and power lines and brings them down.
    "A lot of these places, especially in the more rural areas, are going to stay below freezing for some time so you will not see much the way of melting. They could be without power for a long while."
    Palmer said some 70,000 people in the Dallas-Forth Worth area were already without power and he expected that figure to hit at least 100,000 by the time the storm dissipated on Saturday.
    Elsewhere, temperatures plummeted in most states across the contiguous U.S. except on the East Coast, which was warmer than usual.
    The cold blast stretched into California, where farmers in the San Joaquin Valley were pumping water into the soil and using wind machines to protect the area’s $2 billion citrus crop.
    In the North, in Rapid City, S.D., temperatures became so low that an outdoor ice skating rink was forced to close.
    And two dozen ice-related smashes were reported on the roads in Illinois, in Madison and St. Clair counties, on Thursday.
    School classes were canceled in parts of Idaho, Illinois, and Minnesota.
    One Texas store manager, James McGilberry, dubbed the day "Ice Friday," as schools in the state began canceling classes and shoppers lined up to buy food and other supplies.
    The Dallas Home Depot manager told The Associated Press his store was already running out of firewood and ice melt by Thursday afternoon.
    "It's almost like a Black Friday," McGilberry said, "but I guess we'll call it an Ice Friday."
    The storm was caused by a cold air mass pushing south from Canada and colliding with moisture streaming up from the Gulf of Mexico.
    The National Weather Service issued a swath of winter storm warnings which covered parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio.
    Luis Sanchez Saturno / New Mexican via AP
    Cesar Velasco, from Albuquerque, N.M., sits in his jackknifed 18-wheeler on the side of I-25 Thursday, in La Bajada, N.M.


    Ice storm warnings stretched from Dallas-Fort Worth across southern Oklahoma and central Arkansas and into western Tennessee.
    Palmer said Texas would be spared snow, but anywhere further north should expect coverings as well as temperatures as low as -20 degrees Fahrenheit throughout Friday. This could stretch up to southern parts of New York and western Massachusetts, but would become rain before hitting New York City.
    The storm would begin to dissipate on Friday night and by tomorrow it would be largely over, Palmer said.
    Meanwhile, another storm system was descending on the West Coast from Alaska.
    This is expected to dump snow on coastal areas of Oregon and northern California throughout Friday, before moving onto the Sierra Nevada early Saturday.
    It will then head toward the Midwest – which will then receive a “double whammy” of winter weather -- on Sunday, Palmer said.
    The Associated Press contributed to this report
  • DwightShrute
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 01-17-09
    • 102122

    #2
    Nice and warm here
    Comment
    • rkelly110
      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
      • 10-05-09
      • 39410

      #3
      Yes but, did you know before this cold snap there were record highs?

      Did you know global warming will bring severe weather hot and cold? How about a new record for the month of
      Nov with all the tornados? Philippines huge hurricane? Chinas massive flooding? Our own massive rain fall this year?

      With sun spots at record lows, look for really cold weather.

      I'm getting ready for the ice storm to hit this weekend in PA. Have to get Kero for my heater and get some candles.
      Comment
      • itchypickle
        SBR Posting Legend
        • 11-05-09
        • 21452

        #4
        Originally posted by rkelly110
        Yes but, did you know before this cold snap there were record highs?

        Did you know global warming will bring severe weather hot and cold? How about a new record for the month of
        Nov with all the tornados? Philippines huge hurricane? Chinas massive flooding? Our own massive rain fall this year?

        With sun spots at record lows, look for really cold weather.

        I'm getting ready for the ice storm to hit this weekend in PA. Have to get Kero for my heater and get some candles.
        Headed up to Butler, PA...just up from Pittsburgh Sunday....hope it's not too damn cold or I'm just gonna blame you Kelly
        Comment
        • Let's Go Rangers
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 03-18-12
          • 8918

          #5


          97% scientists
          Comment
          • PAULYPOKER
            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
            • 12-06-08
            • 36581

            #6
            Originally posted by itchypickle

            Headed up to Butler, PA...just up from Pittsburgh Sunday....hope it's not too damn cold or I'm just gonna blame you Kelly
            Comment
            • irish1
              SBR MVP
              • 12-25-12
              • 4837

              #7

              Matt Rourke / AP

              Snowy game day

              Comment
              • itchypickle
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 11-05-09
                • 21452

                #8
                And yet Greenpeace is out with the PSA of a Santa Claus sweating in a basement and saying the end is near, Christmas is over children because your mommy and daddy don't use wind and solar and boycott Koch foods and drive Nissan Leafs

                We know about climate change people....it's called SEASONS! It's gonna be hot as balls in Atlanta next July and it will be colder than a with's teet in Boise this January and most likely suny and mid 70's in Southern Cali.
                Comment
                • rkelly110
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 10-05-09
                  • 39410

                  #9
                  I'm working on my solar powered home heater. Drawing up plans now, then off to the hardware store.
                  Comment
                  • itchypickle
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 11-05-09
                    • 21452

                    #10
                    Originally posted by rkelly110
                    I'm working on my solar powered home heater. Drawing up plans now, then off to the hardware store.
                    Comment
                    • rkelly110
                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                      • 10-05-09
                      • 39410

                      #11
                      No really. Ever see one of those solar powered pool water heaters? Radiator in your car? Same principle.
                      Comment
                      • irish1
                        SBR MVP
                        • 12-25-12
                        • 4837

                        #12
                        Comment
                        • irish1
                          SBR MVP
                          • 12-25-12
                          • 4837

                          #13
                          Winter Storm Weather Forecast 2014: Nor'easter Expected to Batter the Northeast, Affecting Up to 100 Million People



                          By Bernadette R Giacomazzo
                          First Posted: Jan 02, 2014 11:55 AM EST

                          (Photo : NOAA.gov)

                          Many parts of the Northeast are bracing themselves for the mother of all nor'easters, as estimates put the snowfall between 10 to 12 inches in various parts, causing treacherous conditions for up to 100 million residents all throughout the weekend.

                          According to the NY affiliate of NBC News, the New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut regions of the northeast can expect up to 10 inches of snow in various parts; snow is currently falling in the New York area as of 11:00AM on Thursday. The snowfall, which is currently light, is expected to pick up greatly come the early evening, and by Friday, the snowfall will be paired wiith gale-force winds and temperatures plunging into the low teens. As a result, visibility will be low on Friday. Drivers are encouraged to stay off the roads, and Governor Andrew Cuomo suggested that mass transit "is a prudent option" since many highways are expected to be closed.

                          The same storm system dumped a half-foot or more of snow in Illinois Wednesday, prompting hundreds of flight cancellations into and out of Chicago's O'Hare International Airport, according to the aviation tracking website FlightAware.com.

                          And according to Boston.com, even though the snowfall will not be as great in the New England area (only about 4 inches are expected to fall and accumulate), the visibility will still leave much to be desired, causing Boston Mayor Thomas Menino to declare a snow emergency and parking ban beginning today at noon and declared that Boston Public Schools would not re-open as scheduled on Friday. In a statement announcing the precautions, Menino said city business would go an as usual today.

                          SHARE THIS STORY









                          Like Us on Facebook
                          The leading edge of the snow storm was expected to reach the region after midnight, as temperatures dropped into the teens and flurries appeared north of the Massachusetts Turnpike. "It will be snowing lightly, but there won't be any accumulation," said National Weather Service meteorologist Alan Dunham.

                          Tagswinter storm 2014, noreaster 2014, bad winter storm, bad winter storm
                          Comment
                          • Let's Go Rangers
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 03-18-12
                            • 8918

                            #14
                            Comment
                            • rkelly110
                              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                              • 10-05-09
                              • 39410

                              #15
                              Many parts of the Northeast are bracing themselves for the mother of all nor'easters,

                              Not even close. I forget when, 2005-06? Central PA got two 21 inch Nor easters a week apart. 12" ain't shit.
                              My above ground pool was starting to collapse on itself with all the weight. Had to clean it off before a 28'
                              round 8" thick piece of ice went pin balling through the neighborhood. That shit didn't melt until early April.
                              Comment
                              • Waterstpub87
                                SBR MVP
                                • 09-09-09
                                • 4109

                                #16
                                Originally posted by rkelly110
                                Many parts of the Northeast are bracing themselves for the mother of all nor'easters,

                                Not even close. I forget when, 2005-06? Central PA got two 21 inch Nor easters a week apart. 12" ain't shit.
                                My above ground pool was starting to collapse on itself with all the weight. Had to clean it off before a 28'
                                round 8" thick piece of ice went pin balling through the neighborhood. That shit didn't melt until early April.
                                Man I remember that. The college gave up plowing the sidewalks. My car was in two feet of snow. Survived on sheetz hotdogs, two for a dollar.
                                Comment
                                • Andy117
                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                  • 02-07-10
                                  • 9511

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Waterstpub87
                                  Man I remember that. The college gave up plowing the sidewalks. My car was in two feet of snow. Survived on sheetz hotdogs, two for a dollar.
                                  What school did you go to?
                                  Comment
                                  • Let's Go Rangers
                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                    • 03-18-12
                                    • 8918

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Waterstpub87
                                    Man I remember that. The college gave up plowing the sidewalks. My car was in two feet of snow. Survived on sheetz hotdogs, two for a dollar.
                                    Sheetz dogs with sauerkraut
                                    Comment
                                    • rkelly110
                                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                      • 10-05-09
                                      • 39410

                                      #19
                                      Record heat in Australia. I know everyone thinks the world revolves around the US, it doesn't.

                                      By Matt Siegel and Colin Packham SYDNEY (Reuters) - A searing heatwave is baking central and northern Australia, piling more misery on drought-hit cattle farmers who have been slaughtering livestock a...
                                      Comment
                                      • irish1
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 12-25-12
                                        • 4837

                                        #20



                                        600 x 600 · 92 kB · jpeg·Coca Cola Polar BearsShow largerShow smaller
                                        Comment
                                        • irish1
                                          SBR MVP
                                          • 12-25-12
                                          • 4837

                                          #21
                                          Their doing just fine, enjoying one of the coldest winters in decades!!!! Suck on that all you global warming freaks!!!!!
                                          Comment
                                          • irish1
                                            SBR MVP
                                            • 12-25-12
                                            • 4837

                                            #22
                                            2014 greets Western New York with an Arctic blast Heavy snow falls Tuesday in Niagara Square downtown. Frigid weather extends from Montana to Maine. Derek Gee/Buffalo News


                                            By T.J. Pignataro | News Staff Reporter | @TJPignataro | Google+ on December 31, 2013 - 7:22 PM







                                            About the only thing that hasn’t frozen is the date.
                                            Welcome to 2014. Boy, it’s cold.
                                            Buffalo Niagara, and much of the Northeast, woke up to a bitterly frigid New Year’s morning thanks to a “fresh Arctic air mass” that, combined with gusty winds, pushed through Tuesday, dropping temperatures dramatically and sending wind chills plummeting to below zero degrees.
                                            That was just the beginning.
                                            A “very strong northwest flow” will pull even deeper Arctic air into the region over the next few days, according to Kirk Apffel, meteorologist at the National Weather Service in Buffalo, who said the mercury could drop below zero Thursday night and remain frigid through the end of the week.
                                            “Typically, we’ll get one to two Arctic blasts per year. This is one of them,” Apffel said. “It’s just a very cold flow coming across the North Pole.”
                                            That frigid air, combined with other ingredients, will set up significant lake-effect snows in the Southern Tier, across the traditionally hard-hit Tug Hill Plateau east of Lake Ontario and, merging with another storm system, set up the possibility for significant snowfall along the East Coast from around the New York City area through southern New England, forecasters project.
                                            “What’s causing it is less important than what’s happening,” Apffel added. “It’s a persistent northwest flow that keeps bringing in progressively colder air.”
                                            Though Buffalo Niagara can expect to receive a light, steady general snowfall as the result of the expected coastal storm, areas such as New York City and southern Connecticut could see up to eight inches or more with strong, gusty winds. The weather service posted a winter storm watch in those areas for late Thursday into Friday.
                                            “Most of our impact will be lake-effect,” said Aaron Reynolds, weather service meteorologist.
                                            Lake-effect snow associated with the cold blast was already piling up Tuesday. A spotter in Perrysburg reported 10 inches as of midafternoon New Year’s Eve. Weather service spotters also measured more than 2 inches in both East Aurora and Elma.
                                            A lake-effect snow advisory remained posted for southern Erie, Wyoming and Allegany counties through this morning, with as much as 8 inches of snow possible. Even more is forecast in Chautauqua and Cattaraugus counties, where a lake-effect snow warning was in effect. Up to nine inches of snow was expected by this morning with additional accumulations during the day.
                                            The frigid weather – which stretches from Montana to Maine – promises to make today’s 2014 Bridgestone Winter Classic at the University of Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Mich., between the Toronto Maple Leafs and Detroit Red Wings, the coldest by far for the annual outdoor game, the first of which was hosted by Buffalo in 2008 at Ralph Wilson Stadium.
                                            The average temperature for the previous five Winter Classic games is 39.1 degrees, according to NHL.com. Today’s forecast in Ann Arbor calls for a daytime high of 16 degrees with wind-chill values near zero and snowy conditions. It’s even colder further to the west where the mercury fell to minus-29 degrees in portions of northern Minnesota. A minus-30 reading in nearby Winnipeg, Manitoba, where the Buffalo Sabres took on the Jets Tuesday night, brought about some Internet banter from the Buffalo team.
                                            “I don’t know how I skated outdoor as a kid here,” tweeted Sabres captain Steve Ott on Tuesday. “Getting soft.”
                                            The Queen City will get a chance to taste some of that cold Arctic air – though not Winnipeg cold – starting tonight, when temperatures are forecast to drop to about 10 degrees.
                                            The mercury will rebound slightly into the low teens Thursday before dropping to zero Thursday night. Friday’s daytime high is expected to be in the single digits, then drop close to zero again Friday night before rebounding for the weekend. The early weekend forecast promises some relief, with temperatures in the lower 30s, which is near January’s average daytime high of 31 degrees
                                            Comment
                                            • stevenash
                                              Moderator
                                              • 01-17-11
                                              • 66980

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by rkelly110
                                              Yes but, did you know before this cold snap there were record highs?

                                              Did you know global warming will bring severe weather hot and cold? How about a new record for the month of
                                              Nov with all the tornados? Philippines huge hurricane? Chinas massive flooding? Our own massive rain fall this year?

                                              With sun spots at record lows, look for really cold weather.

                                              I'm getting ready for the ice storm to hit this weekend in PA. Have to get Kero for my heater and get some candles.
                                              Did you know that earth has been cooling the past 18 consecutive years?
                                              Comment
                                              • C-Gold
                                                SBR Hall of Famer
                                                • 09-04-10
                                                • 6808

                                                #24
                                                The people that believe in global warming are either part of the money making scam or incredibly naive.
                                                Comment
                                                • rickbo528
                                                  SBR MVP
                                                  • 10-22-08
                                                  • 1842

                                                  #25
                                                  We are supposed to have anywhere from 48 to 60 continuous hours of below zero temperatures starting Sunday night here in Indiana.
                                                  Attached Files
                                                  Comment
                                                  • Let's Go Rangers
                                                    SBR Hall of Famer
                                                    • 03-18-12
                                                    • 8918

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by C-Gold
                                                    The people that believe in global warming are either part of the money making scam or incredibly naive.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • Flashmo
                                                      SBR MVP
                                                      • 09-27-09
                                                      • 1029

                                                      #27
                                                      I'm trying to leave the biggest carbon footprint I can possibly leave..
                                                      Comment
                                                      • stevenash
                                                        Moderator
                                                        • 01-17-11
                                                        • 66980

                                                        #28
                                                        There has been a 29 per cent increase in the amount of ocean covered with ice compared to this time last year, the equivalent of 533,000 square miles.

                                                        In a rebound from 2012's record low, an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia's northern shores, days before the annual re-freeze is even set to begin.

                                                        The Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific had remained blocked by pack-ice all year, forcing some ships to change their routes.

                                                        One ship has now managed to pass through, completing its journey on September 27.

                                                        A leaked report to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) seen by the Mail on Sunday, has led some scientists to claim that the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century.


                                                        If correct, it would contradict computer forecasts of imminent catastrophic warming. The news comes several years after predictions that the arctic would be ice-free by 2013.

                                                        Despite the original forecasts, major climate research centres now accept that there has been a “pause” in global warming since 1997.

                                                        The original predictions led to billions being invested in green measures to combat the effects of climate change.

                                                        The changing predictions have led to the UN's climate change's body holding a crisis meeting, it was reported, and the IPCC is due to report on the situation in October. A pre-summit meeting will be held later this month.

                                                        But the leaked documents are said to show that the governments who fund the IPCC are demanding 1,500 changes to the Fifth Assessment Report - a three-volume study issued every six or seven years – as they claim its current draft does not properly explain the pause.

                                                        The extent to which temperatures will rise with carbon dioxide levels and how much of the warming over the past 150 years, a total of 0.8C, is down to human greenhouse gas emissions are key issues in the debate.

                                                        The IPCC says it is “95 per cent confident” that global warming has been caused by humans - up from 90 per cent in 2007 – according to the draft report.

                                                        However, US climate expert Professor Judith Curry has questioned how this can be true as that rather than increasing in confidence, “uncertainty is getting bigger” within the academic community.

                                                        Long-term cycles in ocean temperature, she said, suggest the world may be approaching a period similar to that from 1965 to 1975, when there was a clear cooling trend.

                                                        At the time some scientists forecast an imminent ice age.

                                                        Professor Anastasios Tsonis, of the University of Wisconsin, said: "We are already in a cooling trend, which I think will continue for the next 15 years at least. There is no doubt the warming of the 1980s and 1990s has stopped.”

                                                        The IPCC is said to maintain that their climate change models suggest a pause of 15 years can be expected. They have denied that there are any crisis meetings over the report.

                                                        Other experts agree that natural cycles cannot explain all of the recorded warming.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • stevenash
                                                          Moderator
                                                          • 01-17-11
                                                          • 66980

                                                          #29
                                                          Read this, this guy has a PHD in stuff related to climate, carbon emissions, etc.
                                                          The guy probably gave up 12 prime time years of drinking on weekends, getting high, and getting laid to learn all this crap.
                                                          Do you know how much you gotta read, write and learn to get a PHD?



                                                          When Physics Trumps Hysteria in Global Warming
                                                          by Michael R. Fox, Ph.D.


                                                          Studiously hidden from public view are some extraordinary findings in physics which are providing new understanding of our planetary history, as well as providing a much more plausible scientific
                                                          understanding of global warming. Regrettably, the current hysteria about global warming is based much more on fear, political agendas, and computer models that don’t agree with each other or the climate, rather than hard-nosed evidence and science.


                                                          The climate forces which have led to the estimated 0.6C degree temperature increase over the past 100 years or more (according to the International Panel on Climate Change) have been assumed to be man-made CO2 emissions from advanced nations including the U.S. We know this can’t be true for several reasons.


                                                          The first is that water vapor provides 95 percent of the total of the greenhouse gases, not CO2. The total of the CO2 represents less than 3 percent of the total. The second is that of the total atmospheric CO2 inventory, the manmade fraction is less than 3 percent of the CO2 total and therefore far less than 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas inventories. Third, studies of the recent climate variations are finding, for example, (See article by J. Oestermans, Science, p. 375, April 29, 2005) that glaciers have been receding since 1750 or so, well before any significant man-made CO2 emissions occurred.


                                                          The mid 1700s were at the very depths of the Little Ice Age, which we have learned was the coldest climate over the last 5000 years. Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.


                                                          It seems more logical that natural forces are still at work with warming and cooling our climate. For example, Fred Singer and Dennis Avery pointed out in their bookUnstoppable Global Warming that over the past 1,000,000 years in climate observations, there have been about 600 periods of warming, and we can surmise from these cycles that among them are about 599 periods of cooling.


                                                          Now we have learned much more based upon observations of cosmic radiation, their sources, and the Sun’s magnetic fields, combined and new discoveries in the laboratory. A new and more comprehensive understanding of our planetary environment has emerged. This gives us a scientifically defensible explanation of both global warming and cooling.
                                                          As the Oesterman study of the 250 years of receding glaciers shows, warming preceded the CO2 increases of the 20th century. That is, man-made CO2 was not significantly involved in this 200 year warming period on the earth. Nor does man-made CO2 explain those 600 periods of warming over the past 1,000,000 years.


                                                          We have known that cosmic radiation is a source of very powerful radiation, more powerful than any in those huge manmade accelerators. We also know that the more energetic cosmic rays can reach the surface of the Earth passing completely through the atmosphere. Those of lesser energy can collide with molecules in the air causing an avalanche of nuclear and particle fragments as they pass through the atmosphere. The energy is dispersed in showers of these particles while still in the atmosphere.


                                                          These collisions are truly nuclear in nature, highly energetic, and take place in our atmosphere every second. These are the nuclear processes by which the atmosphere acts as a protective shield to inhabitants on the earth. These are well known to airline safety experts, as well as to those astronauts who spend weeks and months outside of our protective atmosphere.


                                                          The streams of cosmic radiation originate from deep space sources both within our galaxy, the Milky Way, as well as from galaxies more distant.


                                                          Most of the cosmic rays are charged particles (mostly protons) but less prevalent heavier particles are often measured too, and can be of enormous energy. Being charged particles they can be deflected and modulated by the many magnetic fields found in space. In the proximity of our Sun and the solar system incoming particles “feel” the magnetic field of the Sun and are deflected.


                                                          The extent of the deflection depends upon the strength of the magnetic field of the Sun. The solar magnetic field has been known, studied, and measured for only a few decades. As with other stars, the Sun is able to deflect many, but not all, of these particles of cosmic radiation away from our solar system and our planet according to well-known rules of physics and magnetism.


                                                          Thanks to some recent excellent experimental work in physics by those such as Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark, we now know that cosmic rays and some of the debris from nuclear collisions with atoms in the atmosphere are directly involved with the initiating mechanisms of cloud formation.


                                                          Basically, the more cosmic rays, the more clouds are formed and the cooler the temperature. Since many of the cosmic rays can be deflected by the Sun’s magnet field, the cosmic ray intensity varies inversely with the strength of that field. The stronger the solar magnetic field, the fewer cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, fewer clouds are formed, and the climate becomes warmer.


                                                          Today the Sun’s magnetic field is more than twice as strong as it was at the turn of the last century. During the mid 1700s during the Little Ice Age there was a 70 year period when there were no sunspots (called the Maunder Minimum), and the solar magnetic field was very weak.


                                                          The cosmic rays were not deflected as much by a weakened solar magnetic field, more clouds were formed, thus a cooler climate at that time. These findings provide a simple plausible explanation, defensible with sound physics, and don’t involve a major role for CO2 at all.


                                                          Some of the materials formed in the atmosphere by the cosmic ray collisions are radioactive as well, and are one of many natural sources of radioactivity. These are deposited in the Earth’s surface, and are used to construct a very accurate history of the geology and climate millions of years ago. It can be measured with surprising accuracy.


                                                          In this instance some important collision products formed in the upper atmosphere, are carbon-14 (C-14) and berrylium-10 (Be-10). Being radioactive they decay into non-radioactive products. These have accurately known periods of decay and scientists can measure these materials in both ice cores and geologic cores samples.


                                                          The amounts measured are directly related to many important natural features. Variations in both C-14 and Be-10 can be used to deduce the historical record of variations in the solar magnetic field. By similar techniques the scientists are able to determine variations in the cosmic radiation rates directly, going back hundreds of millions of years. Since the rate of influx of cosmic rays over time has not been constant, our climate has not been constant either.


                                                          What lies ahead are some exciting times in climate physics and our understanding of the environment. Unexplained findings in geological and climate histories are now being explained by these new lines of inquiry. It appears that the Sun’s magnetic field has had a stronger effect on our climate than just the variations in solar irradiance could explain.


                                                          Political leaders, environmental advocates, and even Oscar-winning documentarians who claim that “the debate of climate science is over”, have been shown once again to be very wrong.


                                                          Michael R. Fox, Ph.D., a science and energy reporter for Hawaii Reporter and a science analyst for the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, is retired and now lives in Eastern Washington. He has nearly 40 years experience in the energy field. He has also taught chemistry and energy at the University level.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • Let's Go Rangers
                                                            SBR Hall of Famer
                                                            • 03-18-12
                                                            • 8918

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by stevenash
                                                            Read this, this guy has a PHD in stuff related to climate, carbon emissions, etc.
                                                            The guy probably gave up 12 prime time years of drinking on weekends, getting high, and getting laid to learn all this crap.
                                                            Do you know how much you gotta read, write and learn to get a PHD?



                                                            When Physics Trumps Hysteria in Global Warming
                                                            by Michael R. Fox, Ph.D.


                                                            Studiously hidden from public view are some extraordinary findings in physics which are providing new understanding of our planetary history, as well as providing a much more plausible scientific
                                                            understanding of global warming. Regrettably, the current hysteria about global warming is based much more on fear, political agendas, and computer models that don’t agree with each other or the climate, rather than hard-nosed evidence and science.


                                                            The climate forces which have led to the estimated 0.6C degree temperature increase over the past 100 years or more (according to the International Panel on Climate Change) have been assumed to be man-made CO2 emissions from advanced nations including the U.S. We know this can’t be true for several reasons.


                                                            The first is that water vapor provides 95 percent of the total of the greenhouse gases, not CO2. The total of the CO2 represents less than 3 percent of the total. The second is that of the total atmospheric CO2 inventory, the manmade fraction is less than 3 percent of the CO2 total and therefore far less than 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas inventories. Third, studies of the recent climate variations are finding, for example, (See article by J. Oestermans, Science, p. 375, April 29, 2005) that glaciers have been receding since 1750 or so, well before any significant man-made CO2 emissions occurred.


                                                            The mid 1700s were at the very depths of the Little Ice Age, which we have learned was the coldest climate over the last 5000 years. Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.


                                                            It seems more logical that natural forces are still at work with warming and cooling our climate. For example, Fred Singer and Dennis Avery pointed out in their bookUnstoppable Global Warming that over the past 1,000,000 years in climate observations, there have been about 600 periods of warming, and we can surmise from these cycles that among them are about 599 periods of cooling.


                                                            Now we have learned much more based upon observations of cosmic radiation, their sources, and the Sun’s magnetic fields, combined and new discoveries in the laboratory. A new and more comprehensive understanding of our planetary environment has emerged. This gives us a scientifically defensible explanation of both global warming and cooling.
                                                            As the Oesterman study of the 250 years of receding glaciers shows, warming preceded the CO2 increases of the 20th century. That is, man-made CO2 was not significantly involved in this 200 year warming period on the earth. Nor does man-made CO2 explain those 600 periods of warming over the past 1,000,000 years.


                                                            We have known that cosmic radiation is a source of very powerful radiation, more powerful than any in those huge manmade accelerators. We also know that the more energetic cosmic rays can reach the surface of the Earth passing completely through the atmosphere. Those of lesser energy can collide with molecules in the air causing an avalanche of nuclear and particle fragments as they pass through the atmosphere. The energy is dispersed in showers of these particles while still in the atmosphere.


                                                            These collisions are truly nuclear in nature, highly energetic, and take place in our atmosphere every second. These are the nuclear processes by which the atmosphere acts as a protective shield to inhabitants on the earth. These are well known to airline safety experts, as well as to those astronauts who spend weeks and months outside of our protective atmosphere.


                                                            The streams of cosmic radiation originate from deep space sources both within our galaxy, the Milky Way, as well as from galaxies more distant.


                                                            Most of the cosmic rays are charged particles (mostly protons) but less prevalent heavier particles are often measured too, and can be of enormous energy. Being charged particles they can be deflected and modulated by the many magnetic fields found in space. In the proximity of our Sun and the solar system incoming particles “feel” the magnetic field of the Sun and are deflected.


                                                            The extent of the deflection depends upon the strength of the magnetic field of the Sun. The solar magnetic field has been known, studied, and measured for only a few decades. As with other stars, the Sun is able to deflect many, but not all, of these particles of cosmic radiation away from our solar system and our planet according to well-known rules of physics and magnetism.


                                                            Thanks to some recent excellent experimental work in physics by those such as Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark, we now know that cosmic rays and some of the debris from nuclear collisions with atoms in the atmosphere are directly involved with the initiating mechanisms of cloud formation.


                                                            Basically, the more cosmic rays, the more clouds are formed and the cooler the temperature. Since many of the cosmic rays can be deflected by the Sun’s magnet field, the cosmic ray intensity varies inversely with the strength of that field. The stronger the solar magnetic field, the fewer cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, fewer clouds are formed, and the climate becomes warmer.


                                                            Today the Sun’s magnetic field is more than twice as strong as it was at the turn of the last century. During the mid 1700s during the Little Ice Age there was a 70 year period when there were no sunspots (called the Maunder Minimum), and the solar magnetic field was very weak.


                                                            The cosmic rays were not deflected as much by a weakened solar magnetic field, more clouds were formed, thus a cooler climate at that time. These findings provide a simple plausible explanation, defensible with sound physics, and don’t involve a major role for CO2 at all.


                                                            Some of the materials formed in the atmosphere by the cosmic ray collisions are radioactive as well, and are one of many natural sources of radioactivity. These are deposited in the Earth’s surface, and are used to construct a very accurate history of the geology and climate millions of years ago. It can be measured with surprising accuracy.


                                                            In this instance some important collision products formed in the upper atmosphere, are carbon-14 (C-14) and berrylium-10 (Be-10). Being radioactive they decay into non-radioactive products. These have accurately known periods of decay and scientists can measure these materials in both ice cores and geologic cores samples.


                                                            The amounts measured are directly related to many important natural features. Variations in both C-14 and Be-10 can be used to deduce the historical record of variations in the solar magnetic field. By similar techniques the scientists are able to determine variations in the cosmic radiation rates directly, going back hundreds of millions of years. Since the rate of influx of cosmic rays over time has not been constant, our climate has not been constant either.


                                                            What lies ahead are some exciting times in climate physics and our understanding of the environment. Unexplained findings in geological and climate histories are now being explained by these new lines of inquiry. It appears that the Sun’s magnetic field has had a stronger effect on our climate than just the variations in solar irradiance could explain.


                                                            Political leaders, environmental advocates, and even Oscar-winning documentarians who claim that “the debate of climate science is over”, have been shown once again to be very wrong.


                                                            Michael R. Fox, Ph.D., a science and energy reporter for Hawaii Reporter and a science analyst for the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, is retired and now lives in Eastern Washington. He has nearly 40 years experience in the energy field. He has also taught chemistry and energy at the University level.
                                                            Good read
                                                            There will always be the weak minded sheep that only believe what they are told and are incapable of independent thought ()

                                                            Liberals are generally easily mislead and will believe anything as long as its told to them by "reliable sources"....like the Govt, MSNBC, the dailykos, moveon.org etc.


                                                            Doesnt matter how much physical imperial evidence there is from 4.5 billion years of heating / cooling Earth history......
                                                            They will believe that right now....is the hottest period the Earth has ever experienced....and therefore its man fault ( remember liberals always have to blame somebody )
                                                            Comment
                                                            • ArchieBunker
                                                              SBR MVP
                                                              • 02-21-11
                                                              • 1512

                                                              #31
                                                              -45 here with wind chill somebody told me we would be growing oranges here soon at another site
                                                              Comment
                                                              • rickbo528
                                                                SBR MVP
                                                                • 10-22-08
                                                                • 1842

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by stevenash
                                                                Read this, this guy has a PHD in stuff related to climate, carbon emissions, etc.
                                                                The guy probably gave up 12 prime time years of drinking on weekends, getting high, and getting laid to learn all this crap.
                                                                Do you know how much you gotta read, write and learn to get a PHD?



                                                                When Physics Trumps Hysteria in Global Warming
                                                                by Michael R. Fox, Ph.D.


                                                                Studiously hidden from public view are some extraordinary findings in physics which are providing new understanding of our planetary history, as well as providing a much more plausible scientific
                                                                understanding of global warming. Regrettably, the current hysteria about global warming is based much more on fear, political agendas, and computer models that don’t agree with each other or the climate, rather than hard-nosed evidence and science.


                                                                The climate forces which have led to the estimated 0.6C degree temperature increase over the past 100 years or more (according to the International Panel on Climate Change) have been assumed to be man-made CO2 emissions from advanced nations including the U.S. We know this can’t be true for several reasons.


                                                                The first is that water vapor provides 95 percent of the total of the greenhouse gases, not CO2. The total of the CO2 represents less than 3 percent of the total. The second is that of the total atmospheric CO2 inventory, the manmade fraction is less than 3 percent of the CO2 total and therefore far less than 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas inventories. Third, studies of the recent climate variations are finding, for example, (See article by J. Oestermans, Science, p. 375, April 29, 2005) that glaciers have been receding since 1750 or so, well before any significant man-made CO2 emissions occurred.


                                                                The mid 1700s were at the very depths of the Little Ice Age, which we have learned was the coldest climate over the last 5000 years. Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.


                                                                It seems more logical that natural forces are still at work with warming and cooling our climate. For example, Fred Singer and Dennis Avery pointed out in their bookUnstoppable Global Warming that over the past 1,000,000 years in climate observations, there have been about 600 periods of warming, and we can surmise from these cycles that among them are about 599 periods of cooling.


                                                                Now we have learned much more based upon observations of cosmic radiation, their sources, and the Sun’s magnetic fields, combined and new discoveries in the laboratory. A new and more comprehensive understanding of our planetary environment has emerged. This gives us a scientifically defensible explanation of both global warming and cooling.
                                                                As the Oesterman study of the 250 years of receding glaciers shows, warming preceded the CO2 increases of the 20th century. That is, man-made CO2 was not significantly involved in this 200 year warming period on the earth. Nor does man-made CO2 explain those 600 periods of warming over the past 1,000,000 years.


                                                                We have known that cosmic radiation is a source of very powerful radiation, more powerful than any in those huge manmade accelerators. We also know that the more energetic cosmic rays can reach the surface of the Earth passing completely through the atmosphere. Those of lesser energy can collide with molecules in the air causing an avalanche of nuclear and particle fragments as they pass through the atmosphere. The energy is dispersed in showers of these particles while still in the atmosphere.


                                                                These collisions are truly nuclear in nature, highly energetic, and take place in our atmosphere every second. These are the nuclear processes by which the atmosphere acts as a protective shield to inhabitants on the earth. These are well known to airline safety experts, as well as to those astronauts who spend weeks and months outside of our protective atmosphere.


                                                                The streams of cosmic radiation originate from deep space sources both within our galaxy, the Milky Way, as well as from galaxies more distant.


                                                                Most of the cosmic rays are charged particles (mostly protons) but less prevalent heavier particles are often measured too, and can be of enormous energy. Being charged particles they can be deflected and modulated by the many magnetic fields found in space. In the proximity of our Sun and the solar system incoming particles “feel” the magnetic field of the Sun and are deflected.


                                                                The extent of the deflection depends upon the strength of the magnetic field of the Sun. The solar magnetic field has been known, studied, and measured for only a few decades. As with other stars, the Sun is able to deflect many, but not all, of these particles of cosmic radiation away from our solar system and our planet according to well-known rules of physics and magnetism.


                                                                Thanks to some recent excellent experimental work in physics by those such as Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark, we now know that cosmic rays and some of the debris from nuclear collisions with atoms in the atmosphere are directly involved with the initiating mechanisms of cloud formation.


                                                                Basically, the more cosmic rays, the more clouds are formed and the cooler the temperature. Since many of the cosmic rays can be deflected by the Sun’s magnet field, the cosmic ray intensity varies inversely with the strength of that field. The stronger the solar magnetic field, the fewer cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, fewer clouds are formed, and the climate becomes warmer.


                                                                Today the Sun’s magnetic field is more than twice as strong as it was at the turn of the last century. During the mid 1700s during the Little Ice Age there was a 70 year period when there were no sunspots (called the Maunder Minimum), and the solar magnetic field was very weak.


                                                                The cosmic rays were not deflected as much by a weakened solar magnetic field, more clouds were formed, thus a cooler climate at that time. These findings provide a simple plausible explanation, defensible with sound physics, and don’t involve a major role for CO2 at all.


                                                                Some of the materials formed in the atmosphere by the cosmic ray collisions are radioactive as well, and are one of many natural sources of radioactivity. These are deposited in the Earth’s surface, and are used to construct a very accurate history of the geology and climate millions of years ago. It can be measured with surprising accuracy.


                                                                In this instance some important collision products formed in the upper atmosphere, are carbon-14 (C-14) and berrylium-10 (Be-10). Being radioactive they decay into non-radioactive products. These have accurately known periods of decay and scientists can measure these materials in both ice cores and geologic cores samples.


                                                                The amounts measured are directly related to many important natural features. Variations in both C-14 and Be-10 can be used to deduce the historical record of variations in the solar magnetic field. By similar techniques the scientists are able to determine variations in the cosmic radiation rates directly, going back hundreds of millions of years. Since the rate of influx of cosmic rays over time has not been constant, our climate has not been constant either.


                                                                What lies ahead are some exciting times in climate physics and our understanding of the environment. Unexplained findings in geological and climate histories are now being explained by these new lines of inquiry. It appears that the Sun’s magnetic field has had a stronger effect on our climate than just the variations in solar irradiance could explain.


                                                                Political leaders, environmental advocates, and even Oscar-winning documentarians who claim that “the debate of climate science is over”, have been shown once again to be very wrong.


                                                                Michael R. Fox, Ph.D., a science and energy reporter for Hawaii Reporter and a science analyst for the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, is retired and now lives in Eastern Washington. He has nearly 40 years experience in the energy field. He has also taught chemistry and energy at the University level.

                                                                But, but, but..... How can Al Gore and his liberal pals get rich if they can't continue the greatest hoax of all time? (well maybe second to Obama)
                                                                Comment
                                                                • Let's Go Rangers
                                                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                                                  • 03-18-12
                                                                  • 8918

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_2014-01-05-12-14-59-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	19.0 KB
ID:	29122906
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • rkelly110
                                                                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                                    • 10-05-09
                                                                    • 39410

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Yeah well, bash the liberals all you want, but my life is better with clean air and water compared to China.

                                                                    If the liberals didn't push for clean air, water and the unions who fought for better working conditions,
                                                                    pay and benefits, we would be just like China.

                                                                    Maybe give a liberal a hug today, give 'em a kiss on the cheek and say thank you for fighting for my rights
                                                                    which I don't want or need.

                                                                    It hasn't been this cold in decades. You know the saying what come around goes around? It's coming around.
                                                                    After the summer of constant rain, flooding, tornados and yeah, some record heat thrown in, I expected this.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • stevenash
                                                                      Moderator
                                                                      • 01-17-11
                                                                      • 66980

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by rkelly110
                                                                      Yeah well, bash the liberals all you want, but my life is better with clean air and water compared to China.

                                                                      If the liberals didn't push for clean air, water and the unions who fought for better working conditions,
                                                                      pay and benefits, we would be just like China.

                                                                      Maybe give a liberal a hug today, give 'em a kiss on the cheek and say thank you for fighting for my rights
                                                                      which I don't want or need.

                                                                      It hasn't been this cold in decades. You know the saying what come around goes around? It's coming around.
                                                                      After the summer of constant rain, flooding, tornados and yeah, some record heat thrown in, I expected this.
                                                                      Two things.

                                                                      I listen to any expert liberal/conservative, what have you, that tells me that putting too much crap in the air is bad.

                                                                      Agreed, everybody should be aware of that.
                                                                      But if you tell me, or in Algores case, scream at me that we are killing the earth, the sky is falling, fire and brimstone pshycho babble, sorry, going to have to tune you out.

                                                                      And the US needs to stop spending (wasting) so much money on it too.

                                                                      New estimates show the federal government will spend nearly twice as much fighting global warming this year than on U.S. border security.
                                                                      The White House reported to House Republicans that there are 18 federal agencies engaged in global warming activities in 2013, funding a wide range of programs, including scientific research, international climate assistance, incentivizing renewable energy technology and subsidies to renewable energy producers. Global warming spending is estimated to cost $22.2 billion this year, and $21.4 billion next year.

                                                                      And weather/climate etc. etc. is cyclical, what comes around, goes around.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      Search
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...