Sports Betting Professor MLB 4/16

[Spungalo]

v1.0 YTD: 13-16, -3.88 units (1-1 yesterday, -0.14 units)
v2.0 YTD: 14-25, -8.13 units (1-2 yesterday, -1.23 units)

If you're still playing this guy, you are a masochist.

[Hap]

I agree. Also, the slice-and-dice V1 and and V2 tells me his forte is marketing, not capping.

[kingshorses]

well here is the 2.0 picks for today if u haven't already received them.

"Here are the MLB picks for Friday with Pinnacle's opening line next to the team:

Pittsburgh Pirates -109

Washington Nationals +141

Regards,
Rich"


BOL and be careful.

[rkelly110]

Great fade material. I emailed him when he was trying to sell it. I wanted to know the past
performance of his ver. 2. 54% on -110 or more, 48% on +110 or more. I'm done buying
systems from people if they can't show proof they have a winning system.

[Spungalo]

Thanks kings! Good advice everyone.

[betyuda]

he actually sent me a record and email of the V2.0 success. on average it wins about 40 units per season.

[betyuda]

spungalo, it does seem bad right now, but again, the system does consist a lot of underdogs. one hot streak, and you will be back on top, or at least even, but it has shown to win on average 40 units per year, and thats data consisted of over 17,000 games.

[schenker88]

lol
that runs a bad streak but the season lasts long
i think he will get back on track soon however i do not play his mlb
patience and money management is the key... -4 to 8 units down is not the end of the world
we will see what happens in 2-3 month

[betyuda]

Granted it is a new system, but after back testing it on 17,000 games, i m sure you can go back up as well. I don t really like the first system though. basing it on percentage of popularity is a bit scarier in my opinion on the long run. At least with the 2.0 system, you can back test it more extensively with accurate data.

[Mr.Carrot]

yes, MLB is long season, but currently I dont bet his picks. I know, his bets are based on statistics only but I try use brain (it is hard, I know) and dont bet huge underdogs if they won previous game (f.e. Pittsburg hardly can win two continuous games in San Francisco etc.)
I hope he will improve time to time.
BoL
Hope for great NBA play-off.
Has anyone his last year NBA play-off hitrate?

[Spungalo]

I agree it will upswing. He plays a ton of dogs so winning a small % of them will start to bring him back to zero units. Until I see a winning day or 2, I won't be playing them.

[betyuda]

That is true Mr. Carrot, but all his systems are based on statistics. I mean it hasn t done too bad for NFL, NBA and NCAA college. I ll give it a run on MLB V2.0 as well. I think the worse that can happen is I break even

[betyuda]

Message from Sportsbetting Professor I got:

Last season we were up 36 units.

Yes it was around the same number, this year we are using the v2.0 for the first time. We've targeted only the numbers that have been proven to show a profit over the sample range: over 17,000 games. If you're asking for an exact number I don't know, just like I don't know the NBA either.
It will vary from season-to-season, the major point being all the bets are produced from a range of games that have shown themselves to be money makers.
Home favs -110 hit 54%, road dogs +184 hit 43%. Etc.

All I know is going forward Version 2.0 is the system I believe in the most. The last one was based on public betting percentages and this one is based on money line research so it puts it more in line with my other systems that are based on point spread research. I can't argue with the success I've had in those so I'm putting my baseball eggs in this new basket.

[Mr.Carrot]

His NFL and NCAAB is the same dissaster as MLB (if you count straight bets, it is less then 50%).
If you are using his system it is going well but bet 3 following C bets is not what I have expected.
His NBA is different story - system great and straight bets too (about 68%).
So, it looks that bet by statistics only can work in some leagues but not in all.
And profit 34 units for 7 months long season it really not good number.

[SpookyFellow]

I agree. That is about 1 unit per week. It is not worth the time to bet on his MLB plays.

JMs MLB system is more profitable.

[Spungalo]

v1.0 picks:
Washington Nationals +141

Los Angeles Dodgers -157

Toronto Blue Jays +105

[clownpuncher]

thanks kid!!!!!!!