2014-15 NCAA hoop plays

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • No coincidences
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 01-18-10
    • 76300

    #176
    Adding 3U to UCLA +7 (-108).
    Comment
    • No coincidences
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 01-18-10
      • 76300

      #177
      Originally posted by No coincidences
      Purdue -150 (4.5U to win 3)
      What a fvcking trainwreck effort. Wow.

      Painter is such a shitty coach.
      Comment
      • 2daBank
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 01-26-09
        • 88966

        #178
        cant believe zags up to -7.. ppl really trust them on the road vs a legit team? shit wish i waited but i was pretty happy with +6. hell i sprinkled ml too..
        Comment
        • 2daBank
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-26-09
          • 88966

          #179
          Originally posted by No coincidences
          What a fvcking trainwreck effort. Wow.

          Painter is such a shitty coach.
          their effort on the defensive end been abysmal all season.. meant to play this over but lost track while i was out..
          Comment
          • EDDIE MONEY LINE
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 02-24-10
            • 6298

            #180
            Just hit a sick parlay. Nd and oral Roberts. Def gonna end my night on a nice one unit play on ucla. Let's go 2da
            Comment
            • No coincidences
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 01-18-10
              • 76300

              #181
              Originally posted by 2daBank
              their effort on the defensive end been abysmal all season.. meant to play this over but lost track while i was out..
              If he hadn't played for Purdue, he'd be out by now.

              43 to Vandy in a half?
              Comment
              • 2daBank
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 01-26-09
                • 88966

                #182
                These fuckers need to clean it up. Playing sloppy as hell.
                Comment
                • 2daBank
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 01-26-09
                  • 88966

                  #183
                  Mf'ers even turning it over on fast breaks.. Bad enough they can't buy a basket but ya can't turn it over this damn much..
                  Comment
                  • No coincidences
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 01-18-10
                    • 76300

                    #184
                    Holy shit.

                    UCLA is fvcking trash.
                    Comment
                    • 2daBank
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 01-26-09
                      • 88966

                      #185
                      Originally posted by No coincidences
                      Holy shit.

                      UCLA is fvcking trash.
                      I'm actually pretty encouraged that we still in it playing that poorly. Could easily be far worse. Lots of gm, they will clean it up..
                      Comment
                      • No coincidences
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 01-18-10
                        • 76300

                        #186
                        I know Bryce Alford's stats are better this year, but he sucks.
                        Comment
                        • No coincidences
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 01-18-10
                          • 76300

                          #187
                          Originally posted by 2daBank
                          I'm actually pretty encouraged that we still in it playing that poorly. Could easily be far worse. Lots of gm, they will clean it up..
                          They're getting manhandled.
                          Comment
                          • 2daBank
                            SBR Aristocracy
                            • 01-26-09
                            • 88966

                            #188
                            Originally posted by No coincidences
                            I know Bryce Alford's stats are better this year, but he sucks.
                            I nailed my daily lineup today w everyone scoring 20+ and couple In 30s. Pretty good shot at a nice cash but I have this assclown in my lineup. Can't believe I spent as much of my salary on him as anyone. Wiltjer too, unfortunately he balling and will continue to long as bruins keep playing this pussy zone..if Alford would stop being such a passive bitch I could hit nice score..
                            Comment
                            • 2daBank
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 01-26-09
                              • 88966

                              #189
                              Originally posted by No coincidences
                              They're getting manhandled.
                              We still well within striking distance tho. I've seen ucla play a couple ugly ass 1st halves then look much better in 2nd.. Not like zags are all bout closing teams out on the road..
                              Comment
                              • KRIT
                                SBR Posting Legend
                                • 01-11-14
                                • 12874

                                #190
                                Zags are just a way better team, not really much else to say.
                                Comment
                                • t-wizzle
                                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                  • 12-18-09
                                  • 38099

                                  #191
                                  Originally posted by No coincidences
                                  What a fvcking trainwreck effort. Wow.

                                  Painter is such a shitty coach.

                                  Here we go with the coach blaming.
                                  Comment
                                  • No coincidences
                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                    • 01-18-10
                                    • 76300

                                    #192
                                    Originally posted by 2daBank
                                    We still well within striking distance tho. I've seen ucla play a couple ugly ass 1st halves then look much better in 2nd.. Not like zags are all bout closing teams out on the road..
                                    Every time UCLA gets back into it, Gonzaga just pisses on them and reels off 7 straight points in about 40 seconds.
                                    Comment
                                    • No coincidences
                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                      • 01-18-10
                                      • 76300

                                      #193
                                      Originally posted by t-wizzle
                                      Here we go with the coach blaming.
                                      It's not rocket science (though it might be with you, I understand).

                                      Just look at Purdue before and after Matt Painter.
                                      Comment
                                      • No coincidences
                                        SBR Aristocracy
                                        • 01-18-10
                                        • 76300

                                        #194
                                        Originally posted by KRIT
                                        Zags are just a way better team, not really much else to say.
                                        Exactly.
                                        Comment
                                        • No coincidences
                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                          • 01-18-10
                                          • 76300

                                          #195
                                          Originally posted by 2daBank
                                          We still well within striking distance tho. I've seen ucla play a couple ugly ass 1st halves then look much better in 2nd.. Not like zags are all bout closing teams out on the road..
                                          UCLA is beyond lazy. Just standing around defensively, for loose balls, vs. open shooters, etc.
                                          Comment
                                          • t-wizzle
                                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                            • 12-18-09
                                            • 38099

                                            #196
                                            Originally posted by No coincidences
                                            It's not rocket science (though it might be with you, I understand).

                                            Just look at Purdue before and after Matt Painter.

                                            No what's not rocket science was that Purdue was a sucker line that was juiced the whole time it moved up.

                                            It's not rocket science that this was going to be a tough spot for Purdue and they were overvalued due to a strong start.

                                            Also, he took over a declining program and built it back up. They've gone through a rebuilding process the last few years but seem to be better this year. You always need a scapegoat though. It's usually the coach who you label an idiot with little to nothing to back it up.
                                            Comment
                                            • Bet10Heinekens
                                              SBR Posting Legend
                                              • 01-10-13
                                              • 10567

                                              #197
                                              You need help capping games

                                              UCLA is #315 in experience, #293 in schedule; they were down 8 at half to Riverside in last game, are 1-2 vs top 100 teams, beating #90 San Diego of WCC by 7- they lost to Oklahoma/North Carolina on neutral floor in the Bahamas.

                                              They're a young shitty team, they got some talent and might get better towards the end of year
                                              Comment
                                              • No coincidences
                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                • 01-18-10
                                                • 76300

                                                #198
                                                Originally posted by Bet10Heinekens
                                                You need help capping games

                                                UCLA is #315 in experience, #293 in schedule; they were down 8 at half to Riverside in last game, are 1-2 vs top 100 teams, beating #90 San Diego of WCC by 7- they lost to Oklahoma/North Carolina on neutral floor in the Bahamas.

                                                They're a young shitty team, they got some talent and might get better towards the end of year
                                                You're right: the oddsmakers didn't factor any of this into the equation when they set the line.

                                                Are you seriously this stupid?
                                                Comment
                                                • Bet10Heinekens
                                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                                  • 01-10-13
                                                  • 10567

                                                  #199
                                                  Originally posted by No coincidences
                                                  You're right: the oddsmakers didn't factor any of this into the equation when they set the line.

                                                  Are you seriously this stupid?

                                                  You calling me stupid and you bet UCLA, what a moron, no wonder your not a successful in sports betting...getting ass-rape in college football and the NFL
                                                  Comment
                                                  • No coincidences
                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                    • 01-18-10
                                                    • 76300

                                                    #200
                                                    Originally posted by t-wizzle
                                                    No what's not rocket science was that Purdue was a sucker line that was juiced the whole time it moved up.

                                                    It's not rocket science that this was going to be a tough spot for Purdue and they were overvalued due to a strong start.

                                                    Also, he took over a declining program and built it back up. They've gone through a rebuilding process the last few years but seem to be better this year. You always need a scapegoat though. It's usually the coach who you label an idiot with little to nothing to back it up.
                                                    He "built it back up" for the first few years, but they've done absolutely nothing for two (going on three) seasons now. Not sure why you say they "seem to be better" right now either -- they were pummeled by a mediocre K-State team, lost to North Florida and gave up 81 points to Vandy tonight.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • No coincidences
                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                      • 01-18-10
                                                      • 76300

                                                      #201
                                                      Originally posted by Bet10Heinekens
                                                      You calling me stupid and you bet UCLA, what a moron, no wonder your not a successful in sports betting...getting ass-rape in college football and the NFL
                                                      Do you have any idea what my record is here? If so, wow. If not, I'll go ahead and educate you.
                                                      Comment
                                                      • t-wizzle
                                                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                        • 12-18-09
                                                        • 38099

                                                        #202
                                                        Has Purdue been some historical powerhouse? What am I missing here. As far as I know, they've always just been a solid Big Ten team. They were a good team for a lot of years under Keady but never won anything. Painter might be on the hot seat if they crap out this year but you have nothing to support Painter being a shitty coach. It's just standard no coin blaming the coach when his bet loses.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • No coincidences
                                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                                          • 01-18-10
                                                          • 76300

                                                          #203
                                                          Originally posted by t-wizzle
                                                          Has Purdue been some historical powerhouse? What am I missing here. As far as I know, they've always just been a solid Big Ten team. They were a good team for a lot of years under Keady but never won anything. Painter might be on the hot seat if they crap out this year but you have nothing to support Painter being a shitty coach. It's just standard no coin blaming the coach when his bet loses.
                                                          Losing seasons in 25 years under Gene Keady: 3
                                                          Losing seasons in 9 years under Matt Painter: 3

                                                          Winning % under Gene Keady: .699
                                                          Winning % under Matt Painter: .634

                                                          Big Ten win % under Keady: .611
                                                          Big Ten win % under Painter: .563
                                                          Comment
                                                          • No coincidences
                                                            SBR Aristocracy
                                                            • 01-18-10
                                                            • 76300

                                                            #204
                                                            15-13, -6.75U thread

                                                            Brutal weekend.
                                                            Comment
                                                            • No coincidences
                                                              SBR Aristocracy
                                                              • 01-18-10
                                                              • 76300

                                                              #205
                                                              Updates:



                                                              -5.23U 2014-15 NBA.

                                                              Talk NCAA basketball handicapping, picks, matchups, basketball odds and teams in the NCAAB betting forum.


                                                              -6.75U 2014-15 NCAAB.

                                                              2014-15 NFL picks

                                                              -38.04U 2014-15 NFL.

                                                              2014 NCAA football plays

                                                              -6.27 in 2014-15 college football.

                                                              2014 MLB thread with friends

                                                              +111.93 in 2014 MLB.

                                                              2013-14 NBA picks


                                                              +66.24U in 2013-14 NBA.

                                                              2013-14 NFL picks


                                                              +81.8U in 2013-14 NFL.

                                                              2013 NCAA Football thread


                                                              -17.55U in 2013-14 college football.

                                                              2013-14 NCAA Hoops thread


                                                              -8.79U in 2013-14 NCAA hoops.

                                                              2013 MLB thread


                                                              +93.6U in 2013 MLB.

                                                              2012-13 NCAA hoop picks


                                                              -25.66U in 2012-13 NCAA hoops.

                                                              2012-13 NBA Picks


                                                              +1.5U in 2012-13 NBA.

                                                              2012-13 NFL picks


                                                              +28.73U in 2012-13 NFL.

                                                              2012 NCAA picks


                                                              +10.03U in 2012-13 NCAA football.

                                                              Still up 285.54U total in all sports since the start of the '12 football season, though it's definitely been a cold spell this fall and I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned about the trend. With that being said, I have tried to take a lot of short cuts and skip many tried and true handicapping steps in recent months, and I've paid for it accordingly. Simply put, no free lunches in this game.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • bhoor
                                                                SBR MVP
                                                                • 12-17-12
                                                                • 2256

                                                                #206
                                                                Originally posted by No coincidences
                                                                Updates:
                                                                Still up 285.54U total in all sports since the start of the '12 football season
                                                                Betting $20 per unit won't help you much given the amount of time you put here. Lets say, you made $ 5700 ( 285 u * $20) over 1000 days. And it gives about $5.7 per day, or, $171 per month.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • No coincidences
                                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                                  • 01-18-10
                                                                  • 76300

                                                                  #207
                                                                  Originally posted by bhoor
                                                                  Betting $20 per unit won't help you much given the amount of time you put here. Lets say, you made $ 5700 ( 285 u * $20) over 1000 days. And it gives about $5.7 per day, or, $171 per month.
                                                                  I have a real job. I post here predominantly from work, where I make actual money. I don't gamble for a living. I do it because I like to do it. That's just $5,700 more in my pocket at almost literally zero risk. If someone had tailed me at $100 per unit over that same period of time, they'd be up over $28,000 during that same 1,000 days. Wouldn't be a bad ROI.

                                                                  I have literally zero interest in gambling anything other than the bare minimum to try and supplement my real income. It's all disposable to me. And again, I do it for the sheer enjoyment because I love sports/numbers, vs. trying to make ends meet with my bets.

                                                                  The vast majority of sports gamblers lose money. I'm not about to split hairs over being up comfortably.
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • thetrinity
                                                                    SBR Posting Legend
                                                                    • 01-25-11
                                                                    • 22430

                                                                    #208
                                                                    Originally posted by No coincidences
                                                                    I have a real job. I post here predominantly from work, where I make actual money. I don't gamble for a living. I do it because I like to do it. That's just $5,700 more in my pocket at almost literally zero risk. If someone had tailed me at $100 per unit over that same period of time, they'd be up over $28,000 during that same 1,000 days. Wouldn't be a bad ROI.

                                                                    I have literally zero interest in gambling anything other than the bare minimum to try and supplement my real income. It's all disposable to me. And again, I do it for the sheer enjoyment because I love sports/numbers, vs. trying to make ends meet with my bets.

                                                                    The vast majority of sports gamblers lose money. I'm not about to split hairs over being up comfortably.
                                                                    well said coin, I am wondering if you want to scrap ncaa basketball if you lose again this season, NFL can be written off as a fluke over a 220 game sample.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • Vinnie Paz
                                                                      SBR Posting Legend
                                                                      • 03-27-12
                                                                      • 12177

                                                                      #209
                                                                      Originally posted by thetrinity
                                                                      well said coin, I am wondering if you want to scrap ncaa basketball if you lose again this season, NFL can be written off as a fluke over a 220 game sample.
                                                                      Written off as a fluke? Whys that? Do elaborate.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      • No coincidences
                                                                        SBR Aristocracy
                                                                        • 01-18-10
                                                                        • 76300

                                                                        #210
                                                                        Originally posted by thetrinity
                                                                        well said coin, I am wondering if you want to scrap ncaa basketball if you lose again this season, NFL can be written off as a fluke over a 220 game sample.
                                                                        I should've scrapped both NCAAB and NCAAF a long time ago.

                                                                        I'm not worried about the NFL. I have a winning record this season, but got overzealous on some bigger plays I thought would land. Just one of those years where almost none of them have.
                                                                        Comment
                                                                        SBR Contests
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Working...