Brewers - 160. Debating on which one to play here, but I'm definitely going to play 1 or the other as the Padres have yet to win a road series all season long. I don't see it starting now. 
The Twins are - 140 today. Interest line considering the difference in ERA between the 2 pitchers. I guess Vegas thinks Liriano's hot streak is legitimate. I really want to play this though simply because of how brutal the Cubs lineup is against lefties at a .600 OPS but I was hoping to get this at around - 110
Rockies/Angels over 10.5. 2 Hot offenses, 2 dog shit pitchers, this should be covered by the 6th inning. 21 of the Rockies' 32 home games have had at least 11 runs this year
Astros/Sox over 10. Sox Have been swinging the bats well recently as have the Astros. 2 really terrible pitchers as Harrell's numbers on the road are brutal. White Sox have been an over machine at home recently with the only games not going over being the ones where they faced quality pitchers like Brandon Morrow or where they had a quality pitcher going like Jake Peavy
					The Twins are - 140 today. Interest line considering the difference in ERA between the 2 pitchers. I guess Vegas thinks Liriano's hot streak is legitimate. I really want to play this though simply because of how brutal the Cubs lineup is against lefties at a .600 OPS but I was hoping to get this at around - 110
Rockies/Angels over 10.5. 2 Hot offenses, 2 dog shit pitchers, this should be covered by the 6th inning. 21 of the Rockies' 32 home games have had at least 11 runs this year
Astros/Sox over 10. Sox Have been swinging the bats well recently as have the Astros. 2 really terrible pitchers as Harrell's numbers on the road are brutal. White Sox have been an over machine at home recently with the only games not going over being the ones where they faced quality pitchers like Brandon Morrow or where they had a quality pitcher going like Jake Peavy

 
	 
							
						 
  
							
						
 It's sad I even have to explain this to you.  What I mean by you losing at a 'high percentage' is that you normally take high favorites.  You have to hit at a much higher % when you lay juice than if you lay the normal -105/-110.  Maybe you do hit over 50% of your plays, but when you are laying juice of -150-200 consistently, you are a big time losing gambler.
  It's sad I even have to explain this to you.  What I mean by you losing at a 'high percentage' is that you normally take high favorites.  You have to hit at a much higher % when you lay juice than if you lay the normal -105/-110.  Maybe you do hit over 50% of your plays, but when you are laying juice of -150-200 consistently, you are a big time losing gambler.   
							
						
 GL
 GL