Blacklisted by ** or **?

[CS-Cedrick]

Careful with ** and ** for you gamblers in the US. These entities have been blacklisting a lot of people because of suspected gambling activity. I suggest you fellas that like doing person to person transaction to get an account with companies like e-wallet express because they do not make it too much of a hassle when making a deposit.

[bigboydan]

I hear ya sir, however Ewalletexpress is really not a viable option IMO. Now don't get me wrong, the services they provide are ok, but I'm talking about their fees. Those can be quite costly to players.

[CS-Cedrick]

I hear ya sir, however Ewalletexpress is really not a viable option IMO. Now don't get me wrong, the services they provide are ok, but I'm talking about their fees. Those can be quite costly to players.

You're right on that sir, but, most books refund fees when depositing so that's what I believe it has to be a must from books, try to refund fees starting on little deposits. For our dear bettors right now just check who can give you the best option for deposits such as the suggested one above and check if they refund fees.

[bigboydan]

It's not the reimbursement on the depositing fees, but rather the 10% on the withdraw fees. That really adds up once you do the math.

[CS-Cedrick]

It's not the reimbursement on the depositing fees, but rather the 10% on the withdraw fees. That really adds up once you do the math.

Wow, that does come to be a real inconvenience. No wonder it's usually them that charge the fees, not the book itself.

[bigboydan]

Yep, great service but it's just not a viable option for most. That's why most U.S. players opt for other solutions. Heck, I didn't even mention the gradual limit increased steps they put people through either, which doesn't help matter either.

[CS-Cedrick]

Yep, great service but it's just not a viable option for most. That's why most U.S. players opt for other solutions. Heck, I didn't even mention the gradual limit increased steps they put people through either, which doesn't help matter either.

What do you think it would be a good option for players to deposit instead of using ** and ** that often to avoid blacklisting, BBD?

[bigboydan]

Echecks would be be ideal if you can find a quality establishments that offers it. I do realize their are a lot of hoops books have to jump through to obtain such a processing solution, however it's probably worth it considering the amount of business that can be generated from it.

[krk1030]

I hate the fees they charge.

It costs like $9 to send a ** up to $1000.

But to get a cashout they sportsbooks charge like $50.

[CS-Cedrick]

Echecks would be be ideal if you can find a quality establishments that offers it. I do realize their are a lot of hoops books have to jump through to obtain such a processing solution, however it's probably worth it considering the amount of business that can be generated from it.

Electronic transfers are a good option for both purposes: deposit and withdrawals. But you're right when you mention that it could be a problem to have access to those methods. Most books ask for some history prior to using them for fraud prevention purposes. That could be a problem for brand new players. But I support the fact that an electronic transfer is an easy way to fund an account and to have a pyout

[bigboydan]

But to get a cashout they sportsbooks charge like $50.

I can assure you that boy scouts are not processing your withdraw requests. So it's just something that players have to accept and chalk it up as a cost of doing business on the books part. I know it sucks but it's just the way it is I'm sorry to say sir.

[CS-Cedrick]

I can assure you that boy scouts are not processing your withdraw requests. So it's just something that players have to accept and chalk it up as a cost of doing business on the books part. I know it sucks but it's just the way it is I'm sorry to say sir.

I definitely have to agree on that as well, payout fees also include the processing, specially the person to person transactions because the ones involved are strictly not linked with the companies but to make these transactions, all to protect customers, otherwise, if books didn't care, they would just make it person to company using the book itself as a receiver and risking both parties, the sender and the receiver.

[bigboydan]

Electronic transfers are a good option for both purposes: deposit and withdrawals. But you're right when you mention that it could be a problem to have access to those methods. Most books ask for some history prior to using them for fraud prevention purposes. That could be a problem for brand new players. But I support the fact that an electronic transfer is an easy way to fund an account and to have a pyout

I'm not going to get into details on a public forum regarding this matter because I respect the books position on the subject. However without mentioning any book names, the ones that do accept that payment solution do have certain standards before letting players use the option.

[CS-Cedrick]

Yes sir, I appreciate the help.

[ringemup]

** is epecially sensitive to online transactions that look fishy. theyll shut u down after a few transactions. but if u go to an agent its ok, ive been doin ** like this for over like 6 yrs. even racked up enough ** gold points to get a 125 dollar check. but all in all, the fees r a hassle n it looks shady walking into the agent anyway. the only good part bout ** is that u can avoid being taxed by the US govt. by just taking payouts in cold hard cash instead of it showing up in ur bank acct. as a check deposit. but ud prob want to use a different ** agent location for each payout considering itd look shady receiving money at the same place ur sending it.

[gambleballs]

the only good part bout ** is that u can avoid being taxed by the US govt.

hahaha. Right. Obviously you've never been audited. YET.

[ZXCVBNM]

hahaha. Right. Obviously you've never been audited. YET.

has this happened to you? explain please, that's quite a loaded statement