Republican vs Democrat

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jt315
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!
    2028

    Worth an early small punt: Jon Ossoff, currently around the 100/1 mark

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied


    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    2028

    Worth an early small punt: Jon Ossoff, currently around the 100/1 mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Here’s the transcript of Trump's response to his daughter-in-law's question:

    Read his answer for yourself to see just how far gone he is mentally:

    Lara Trump: Some people refer to you as ‘the bodyguard of Western Civilization.’ How do you feel about that title?

    “Well, I understand what they mean. It was gone bad. We were going bad. This country was going bad. Uhh lot of people were talking to China and others about getting involved because we were a dead country. We were gone in the minds of many; I tell ya, in my mind; one of the reasons I ran I saw what was happening very early on when I saw people pouring across our border, I said, “No, put up that little, it’s a little, it would’ve taken three three weeks to put up little sections of wall” that we laid out because of legal reasons we had condemnation reasons, you know, different things and because we wanted to bring our equipment back in through the wall cause we built hundreds of miles and I said, “Don’t, why aren’t they filling that in? It would have just been that would’ve been complete.” In fact I added a lot more I built a lot more than I said I was gonna build, I made it much longer. But I said “You know, they wanna have open borders.” That was the first time I realized that. I didn’t think it would be possible for anybody to want open borders, because, you know, who would want open borders?”

    This was a softball question meant to tee him up to sound strong, heroic, and thoughtful.

    But he totally fails to address the question!

    Instead, what followed is an incoherent, rambling, often self-contradictory word-salad stream of consciousness.

    And this isn't just a one-off thing ... it's repeated in almost every interview he does.

    The world is laughing at the President you voted in.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by 19th Hole


    Expert sounds off on ‘disgusting’ Newsom for trying to obstruct ICE raid

    Newscum is pathetic. The dems are lost.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	35
Size:	143.8 KB
ID:	29886408

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	37
Size:	111.5 KB
ID:	29886400
    for those who like to say both sides are the same

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    After Trump slapped big tariffs on Brazil saying disgraced former president Jair Bolsonaro should be released from prosecution, Brazilian officials are reportedly debating an equal tariff on the US until the Epstein files are released.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	35
Size:	127.6 KB
ID:	29886396
    truth

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	35
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	29886389

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied




    Netanyahu touts US and Israel as the 'two innovation nations in the world'

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied


    Expert sounds off on ‘disgusting’ Newsom for trying to obstruct ICE raid


    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied



    Netanyahu Interview

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by slewfan
    If you are here illegally, you are breaking the law and therefore you are a criminal.
    I agree. Let ICE arrest her:
    Melania became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2006. However, reports from the Associated Press suggest she may have engaged in paid modeling work in the U.S. before obtaining a valid work ****. According to documents examined by the AP, she was paid for ten modeling assignments between September 10 and October 15, 1996. She entered the U.S. on a B1/B2 visitor **** on August 27, 1996, and later secured an H-1B work **** on October 18, 1996. Her visitor **** allowed her to be in the country and seek employment but not to perform paid work.

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by guitarjosh

    The democrats misinterpret the Constitution so they don't have to follow it, have said they'll add states to the country so they can get more seats in the House and Senate, & have called for a massive expansion of the courts so they can misinterpret the laws and remove all checks and balances on their power.
    I'm not here to argue how Republicans and Democrats interpret the constitution. This job according to the forefathers who wrote the laws of the land is the judiciary, the third element of the republic. So when you see judges ruling on everything that violates the constitution (examples are 5th and 14th amendment I posted earlier)they are doing their jobs. It is the government's job to comply to these rulings and then follow procedures through the court system. If the courts rule one way or the other then the law has to be obeyed so that the constitution is not violated. Let the process run through the courts before making judgement. What the republican or democrat voters think is the law has no value when the courts are to decide. Just because a judge rules one way it doesn't mean he is doing a favor to democrats or republicans.

    Leave a comment:


  • slewfan
    replied
    If you are here illegally, you are breaking the law and therefore you are a criminal.

    Leave a comment:


  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    The President must follow the constitution. When the president violates the constitution the other two branches serve as check and balances. The judges oath is to the constitution and not to the president. And since you are not a citizen or are allowed to vote in the US here is what he constitution says.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	14th-am650X390.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	47.7 KB
ID:	29886242
    The democrats misinterpret the Constitution so they don't have to follow it, have said they'll add states to the country so they can get more seats in the House and Senate, & have called for a massive expansion of the courts so they can misinterpret the laws and remove all checks and balances on their power.

    Leave a comment:


  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    Read again until it sticks in the empty space between your ears:
    I eagerly await the day the democrats will actually abide by this, not just accuse others of not doing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • guitarjosh
    replied
    Originally posted by Optional

    Why do you think that?

    And why would it matter? Are you suggesting that whatever AOC does is the benchmark for what is ok for Trump to do??

    AOC is an extremist idiot btw. As is MTG. And Biden is a dishonorable POS, just like Trump is.

    What does it matter if another scumbag exists? Unless you think the lowest common denominator of scum bags is the level your guy should use as his benchmark??


    But back to the actual point you are trying so hard to avoid...

    "do you think everyone should stick their head in the sand and ignore that quacking, walking duck in the room???"
    Because you rarely complained about the left compared to Trump, even though the left is the much bigger problem.

    It’s not what AOC does, it’s what the party will go along with. They always say that silence is complicity. If they refuse to condemn her, they’re clearly okay with what she’s doing. I’m suggesting that you can’t play nice with evil, you’ve got to be as brutal as you can with it. You must escalate until they are broken. You cannot play nice with people who boast that when they get power, they will put you in jail for going against their party. You can’t be nice to people who claim they’ll gut your Constitutional rights for public safety. Everything they accuse Trump of doing, they’re doing it worse. They’re claiming Trump is violating due process rights by not giving people who came here illegally in the past 2 years a trial, despite it was Bill Clinton who signed into a law that allowed people who came here illegally within the past 2 years to be expelled without any court date. Meanwhile, the democrats are saying that they can ignore the Constitution by misinterpretation. If you don’t like something in the Constitution, you go through the process in Article 5 of the Constitution to make an amendment, not misinterpret the law. All Americans have due process rights through Article 5, yet the democrats try to ignore it.

    Let me ask you, if Iran explicitly states that if they get a nuclear weapon, they’ll use it to wipe America off the face of the earth, is it wrong for America to use force to prevent Iran from getting a nuke? I don’t think it is. I also don’t think it’s wrong to use force to stop people who openly boast that if they can get a small House majority, a 50-50+1 Senate, and the presidency, they’ll make a massive power grab, eliminate all checks and balances on their power, change the rules so they never lose power, and eliminate most of your rights.

    I don’t think people should stick their heads in the sand, I think people like you should stop seeing things that aren’t in the sand while ignoring the army of ducks called democrats that are aiming to turn America into a managed or guided democracy. You know, one where everyone gets a ballot, but the only people who control what goes on a ballot are democrats who will never allow real change to happen.

    Leave a comment:

Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...